Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

The Official FC Wheel Fitment Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 08:08 PM
  #4701  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
Originally Posted by Josh18_2k
fyi, 285/40/17 is a pretty tall tire and will hit the front of the fender well right at/above the moulding when the susp compresses. 275 is hit or miss there. if trot's car doesnt have that problem, hes probably not very low lol
The difference between a 285/40R17 and 2745/40R17 is 1/3" (8mm), not that big a deal. My car is still on stock suspension, so no it's not very low. But it doesn't make much of a difference, bottoming out stock suspension or lowered stiffer springs have the same effect. I've had to bang it out and pull it out with a baseball bat a few times after finding different places that were rubbing.

Here's the deal, the Tein suspension will give you more clearance on the inside, and the 20mm overfender will give you more clearance on the outside. You could try the +18 offset like mine. I'll try diggin up a picture of my wheels.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 10:07 PM
  #4702  
gready123456's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 1
From: trinidad and tobago
Originally Posted by J.T.P.
sytfu FC3's car is at my shop getting a haltech installed along with a new fuel system, ls-1 coils, full tune, etc... he asked me to figure out some good wheel fitments for some new wheels for him... this looks to be just right...


damn what offset are those ?????? this looks very sexy on that car man
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 10:11 PM
  #4703  
2red1986rx7s's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: cali
Originally Posted by Trots*88TII-AE*
The difference between a 285/40R17 and 2745/40R17 is 1/3" (8mm), not that big a deal. My car is still on stock suspension, so no it's not very low. But it doesn't make much of a difference, bottoming out stock suspension or lowered stiffer springs have the same effect. I've had to bang it out and pull it out with a baseball bat a few times after finding different places that were rubbing.

Here's the deal, the Tein suspension will give you more clearance on the inside, and the 20mm overfender will give you more clearance on the outside. You could try the +18 offset like mine. I'll try diggin up a picture of my wheels.
That would be great man
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 06:47 PM
  #4704  
Josh18_2k's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 1
From: Gresham, OR
Originally Posted by Trots*88TII-AE*
The difference between a 285/40R17 and 2745/40R17 is 1/3" (8mm), not that big a deal. My car is still on stock suspension, so no it's not very low. But it doesn't make much of a difference, bottoming out stock suspension or lowered stiffer springs have the same effect. I've had to bang it out and pull it out with a baseball bat a few times after finding different places that were rubbing.
took some pics to help elaborate.

when i cut out my fenders, i cut all the way down to the moulding, and grinded a little bit of hte material off along the back edge of the moulding area. probably not a measurable amount, but you can kinda tell in the pics that theres a curve to the back edge now where some metal is missing.

i run 315/35/17 kumho v710's, which are the exact same height as 275/40/17's (and therefore 8mm shorter than a 285). as you can sorta see, i have rubber all along the back edge of the moulding area. the tire eats through the zip tie every couple of autox's.
FWIW i have spherical control arm bearings, so its not just from old-bushing flex.

PS, ignore the gay wheels lol. thems drift spares for this weekend.


Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 05:33 AM
  #4705  
Red_Rotor's Avatar
rear wheel steering
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Shelton wa
i might be getting some 17x12.5 i dunno what the offset is but with how wide they are what offset could i get away with? that is without rubbing on suspension. (ground control sleeve overs)
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 06:11 AM
  #4706  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
Originally Posted by MaczPayne
I'm running 17x9 +17 all around. I'm running a square tire setup because it's easier to sort out the handling without having to compensate for differing widths of tire. I can also rotate the tires to get the most use out of them.
Ah, this is good news. I may not end up with the 18x8 +45's, the seller's being dumb. However I found some 17x9 +20's. I think I'd be happier with those.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #4707  
Wild Bill Massey's Avatar
Wild Bill Certified
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 264
Likes: 8
From: Ebensburg, Pennsylvania
Finally got my wheels and tires on.

Ended up going with 17x7 w/ 245/45 at all the corners.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2010 | 12:30 AM
  #4708  
K!NCH's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 26
From: Cincinnati, OH
I've been looking into Varrstoens. I wish they made a 17 or at least and 18x9 +22

Will a 18x9 +15 fit on all corners with about -2.5 camber in the front and -1~ in the back. All my camber is adjustable.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2010 | 12:59 AM
  #4709  
10yearrx7's Avatar
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: in my car
Got my wheels on today. 17x8 +35 front and 17x9 +43 rear. They fit perfectly with no fender roll and no rubbing. The rears are a little close to lower control arm, maybe 1/8th to 1/4 inch but I do not think it is anything to worry about. Tires are 235/40/17 front 255/40/17 rear. I'll post pics tomorow or somethin'
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2010 | 01:36 AM
  #4710  
Battle Cat's Avatar
Space cadet
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,308
Likes: 3
From: LOS ANGELES
i think i need wide body ffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuu


Reply
Old Sep 25, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #4711  
DC13B's Avatar
new paint
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Durham,NC
holy shiat
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #4712  
XIEmperorIX's Avatar
Boxer with a Rotor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
So I'm a little confused on what will and won't fit with this car so I figured I would go ahead and ask..been searching and I'm still a little confused..

from what I read...

17x8 +25 front and 17x9 +17 rear should clear the suspension and work with the stock body fine or would some rolling be required? Going to be dropping the car on stance coilovers soon..not sure how low I'll actually be going yet though.

Sorry...so much info in this thread it was making my head spin haha
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 12:37 PM
  #4713  
10yearrx7's Avatar
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: in my car
From my experience you will need to roll fenders. Unless you are going with 215 fronts and 235 rears, it might work. I think 17x8 +35 is perfect for the front and 17x9 +35 is perfect for the rear with no roll or pull. I have 17x8 +35 f and 17x9 +43 rear and it is perfect but the rears could come out a little safely.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 01:04 PM
  #4714  
XIEmperorIX's Avatar
Boxer with a Rotor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Thanks man! That clears things up a bit. I don't necessarily mind having to roll my fenders but I just keep seeing different things in this thread it was throwing me of :P
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #4715  
10yearrx7's Avatar
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: in my car
No problem

Here is a pic of my set-up so you can get an idea. 17x8 +35 235/40/17 f and 17x9 +43 255/40/17 r

Name:  newwheels.jpg
Views: 462
Size:  73.5 KB

Last edited by 10yearrx7; Sep 28, 2010 at 02:36 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #4716  
10yearrx7's Avatar
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: in my car
Name:  newpics086.jpg
Views: 438
Size:  74.4 KB

Name:  newpics090.jpg
Views: 414
Size:  85.2 KB

Name:  newpics089.jpg
Views: 394
Size:  100.6 KB

Name:  newpics092.jpg
Views: 432
Size:  116.9 KB
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #4717  
Dattosan's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Looks good, how well does it clear? Any Rubbing?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 10:40 PM
  #4718  
10yearrx7's Avatar
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: in my car
Thanx. So far so good. only about an 1/8th inch clearance in many different places but I think thats fine. Every one told me the rears would not fit but they did, apparently. lol
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:17 PM
  #4719  
cool's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: peoria IL
How about a 17x9 +33 with a 275/40/17 BFG DR on the rear?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:43 PM
  #4720  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
Yes it should work with minor fender work. It will be very close to the stock suspension though... A 10" wheel with +18 offset will work better, as the tire will fit the wheel better, maybe giving a better contact patch...
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #4721  
Archangels's Avatar
- Make Haste -
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
17 x 7 +34 (225/45/17)
17 x 8 +35 (255/40/17)

what do you guy's think of this fitment on a 1989 FC Turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 11:27 PM
  #4722  
K!NCH's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 26
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by Archangels
17 x 7 +34 (225/45/17)
17 x 8 +35 (255/40/17)

what do you guy's think of this fitment on a 1989 FC Turbo.
It'll fit just fine maybe a small spacer make to make it a bit more flush if you want.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 01:03 AM
  #4723  
Josh18_2k's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 1
From: Gresham, OR
tires are kinda big for the wheels. that setup would be better suited to 17x8/9. but yah, offsets are spot on
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 11:59 PM
  #4724  
AaronJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Do you guys think 17x10 with 255s can be done with 25mm fenders
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #4725  
blackedoutFC3S's Avatar
HKS obsessed
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: OP, KS
http://www.gtfactory.jp/cms/e107_plu...opic.php?233.0

Maybe I missed it, but I can't find out what tires this guys runnin when he rolls his fenders again. Just wondering what size rears he's running if anybody knows? His names Martin and his FC has the nicest roll I've ever seen on the rear quarters.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.