save the whales, SAVE YOUR MOTOR
#326
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
*shakes head* Where does this kind of random stuff come from? It certainly has nothing to do with the facts. Modern two stroke synthetics can be mixed leaner because they lubricate better, pure and simple. With that said, I still pre-mix at 40:1 in my big bore GP1500R waverunner.
Anyhow, again, Amsoil's recommendations for two cycle engines have exactly nothing to do with apex seal lubrication in a rotary, so trying to extrapolate ratios between the two is plainly moronic! The relative surface areas aren't even close between a two stroke crankshaft/pistons and the tiny seals in a rotary!
way, way, way too much oil....no doubt you're losing power on top end...I also run 3 mm seals and I've been doing it for five years and 30k miles - I follow Idemitsu's recommendation, which trumps anyone else's opinion
Anyhow, again, Amsoil's recommendations for two cycle engines have exactly nothing to do with apex seal lubrication in a rotary, so trying to extrapolate ratios between the two is plainly moronic! The relative surface areas aren't even close between a two stroke crankshaft/pistons and the tiny seals in a rotary!
way, way, way too much oil....no doubt you're losing power on top end...I also run 3 mm seals and I've been doing it for five years and 30k miles - I follow Idemitsu's recommendation, which trumps anyone else's opinion
I only mix heavy oil, because I have warped 2 sets of seals with less oil. A little less oil is way cheaper then replacing seals.
#329
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
iTrader: (13)
OK?? LMAO!! Me and others stated this and why the initial two comparison of Howard's motor and Auto motor isn't comparable? I mean, isn't what I been saying all along that there aren't enough data to show pre-mix alone at 1/2 oz per gallon contribute to longevity of the motor? Aren't you the one stating We need more science here, and less random speculation but aren't you now speculating more than anything??
Again, So what would you say to Howard's initial post? Would you now say comparing stock ECU ran vs. Howard's tuned car can't be compared?
Wait a minute... So, you also agree that there is a liability issue at hand but you are saying they told you to use it without OMP?? I highly doubt they even told you.. It kind of boils down to your words which at this point, I'm reluctant to believe. Before you keep insisting Pre-mix only and stating behave of Idemitsu, I suggest you get your contact to write you a letter stating they told you so.
Again, So what would you say to Howard's initial post? Would you now say comparing stock ECU ran vs. Howard's tuned car can't be compared?
Wait a minute... So, you also agree that there is a liability issue at hand but you are saying they told you to use it without OMP?? I highly doubt they even told you.. It kind of boils down to your words which at this point, I'm reluctant to believe. Before you keep insisting Pre-mix only and stating behave of Idemitsu, I suggest you get your contact to write you a letter stating they told you so.
#330
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
iTrader: (13)
Do you know what they were looking for when Idemitsu used 1:20 ratio during their patent testing?
Here:
Now read what 6 places on the piston Idemitsu was looking at...
For those of you not sure about some of the piston parts are
And yes, its not a diagram of 2 stroke piston but it shares similarities in those parts... If you still don't quite get the similarities they were looking for of 2 cycle and rotary, I don't know what to tell you.
Last edited by Herblenny; 03-08-10 at 08:06 AM.
#331
There literature states it reduces deposits.
This is completely irrational. If they recommend 1/2 oz with the OMP as supplemental lubrication for "additional protection", it make absolutely no sense that the same 1/2 oz would be cover the lubrication requirement without the pump. This implies that the OMP is not supplying any lubrication, which we know to be false.
It is much more realistic if the recommendation were 1/2 oz with the OMP, 1oz without the OMP or something along those lines.
We have all been told by Mazda that a stock rotary can use upwards of 1qt of oil per 1000 miles of driving.
It is much more realistic if the recommendation were 1/2 oz with the OMP, 1oz without the OMP or something along those lines.
We have all been told by Mazda that a stock rotary can use upwards of 1qt of oil per 1000 miles of driving.
#332
"Elusive, not deceptive!”
Notice the carbon build up on the premix rotors compared to the non-premix. Neither using AI.
One observation about premix might be that it coats things that don’t require lubrication.
Everything from the injector diffuser, the port tunnels, the sides of the rotor, and face of the rotor.
What’s left is deposited on the parts we want lubricated like the housing surface and the side plate surfaces.
The OMP on the other hand deposits it’s oil at the point of the most critical need. At the apex seal itself.
More correctly it deposits it at the center of the apex seal’s trace on the housing.
The spot where it will have to cross the two hot and protruding spark plug openings and the exhaust port.
Barry.
One observation about premix might be that it coats things that don’t require lubrication.
Everything from the injector diffuser, the port tunnels, the sides of the rotor, and face of the rotor.
What’s left is deposited on the parts we want lubricated like the housing surface and the side plate surfaces.
The OMP on the other hand deposits it’s oil at the point of the most critical need. At the apex seal itself.
More correctly it deposits it at the center of the apex seal’s trace on the housing.
The spot where it will have to cross the two hot and protruding spark plug openings and the exhaust port.
Barry.
#333
Full Member
iTrader: (8)
Alot of interesting reading here and data to go with it. Im a new rotary fan but learning as much as I can and hungry for more. I wanted to share what Dave at Redline Oil told me about what there racing users do and use. He mentions 100:1 is what most of them run and that's with the OMP. I don't know if they modify the OMP for racing or not either or if you can? For the street though he did say 150:1 is ample he said almost sound like it was a bit over kill but not harmful. He recommended the race two stroke oil which you can read about here. This is what most are running on the track.
http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=19&pcid=16
The great thing about Redline Oil is that its base stock is a Class V ester base which as a lubricant is the highest rating you can get. On my 2 stroke watercraft engines when I opened one up it looked very clean where before when I was using a petroleum based Yamalube that was not the case. The positive effects would most likely be the same with the 4 stroke oil being injected. The oil naturally leaves little or no deposits which I would imagine should help in our engines over time.
This place below sells the 16oz size for a good price. That would be perfect per a tank full. It would get you very near 150:1 without having to use a funnel every time and a ratio rite. I believe Mazdas engineers had it right with the direct oil injection timed for the apex seals. A pre mix oil would be a great supplemental benefit without doubt. Keep in mind also Idemitsu's two stroke oil is a synthetic blend as well.
http://www.racerpartswholesale.com/p...Red_Line_Other
http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=19&pcid=16
The great thing about Redline Oil is that its base stock is a Class V ester base which as a lubricant is the highest rating you can get. On my 2 stroke watercraft engines when I opened one up it looked very clean where before when I was using a petroleum based Yamalube that was not the case. The positive effects would most likely be the same with the 4 stroke oil being injected. The oil naturally leaves little or no deposits which I would imagine should help in our engines over time.
This place below sells the 16oz size for a good price. That would be perfect per a tank full. It would get you very near 150:1 without having to use a funnel every time and a ratio rite. I believe Mazdas engineers had it right with the direct oil injection timed for the apex seals. A pre mix oil would be a great supplemental benefit without doubt. Keep in mind also Idemitsu's two stroke oil is a synthetic blend as well.
http://www.racerpartswholesale.com/p...Red_Line_Other
Last edited by RX7.Pilot; 03-08-10 at 12:53 PM.
#334
i been doing what howard has been, 1/2 oz per on street, 1oz per on the dyno. no issues so far and ill be running methanol injection hopefully by the end of this week.
#336
In all fairness, I have to say that the S4 TII rotor pictured is not the norm. If I were shown that rotor I would say it had far less mileage on the engine then stated. Not saying just startn is incorrect, just that I would rate that rotors cleanliness as exceptional for the mileage. Typically there is far more carbon build up and oil on the sides of the rotors as there are oil injectors mounted in the LIM, feeding oil into the intake air stream.
We have hundreds of picures of rotors as they come out of engines. We photo document every engine teardown and rebuild for every customer.
60K TII rotor with stock mechanical OMP intact
We have hundreds of picures of rotors as they come out of engines. We photo document every engine teardown and rebuild for every customer.
60K TII rotor with stock mechanical OMP intact
Last edited by Banzai-Racing; 03-09-10 at 06:58 AM.
#338
Turbo vert
iTrader: (33)
Banzi---The rotors do really have 54k on them. I know the orignal owner and everything about the car. I used to drive the car a little bit last year. When i drove it i beat the **** out of it, i mean rev limeter every minute **** like that. when i pulled the rear iron off i almost **** myself when it was that clean i couldnt believe what i was seeing.
#339
Just startn- I believe you, as I said that rotor is exceptionally clean for the mileage and not what we normally see.
Barry- We don't typically spend a lot of time inspecting the components that are not going to be used in the rebuild. We never reuse apex seals, the old ones are given back to the customer.
Barry- We don't typically spend a lot of time inspecting the components that are not going to be used in the rebuild. We never reuse apex seals, the old ones are given back to the customer.
#341
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do you premix every single time you fill up with gas or is it a once a month type of thing?
if you premix 2 stroke at 1/2 oz per gal and an FD tank is around 14 gal then lets say you put in 7 oz of 2 stroke per refill everytime?
if you premix 2 stroke at 1/2 oz per gal and an FD tank is around 14 gal then lets say you put in 7 oz of 2 stroke per refill everytime?
#343
Full Member
iTrader: (8)
Hello again everyone. I was also thinking about other factors that may contribute to the carbon in some engines. Besides cold climate usage, the fuel you use has an important roll in carbon build up. Here is some information about gas and what top tier gas stations maybe in your area. Take a look.
Why top tier gas,
http://www.toptiergas.com/index.html
Deposit Control,
http://www.toptiergas.com/deposit_control.html
Retailers of top tier gas (Hopefully you have one of these near you),
http://www.toptiergas.com/retailers.html
Why top tier gas,
http://www.toptiergas.com/index.html
Deposit Control,
http://www.toptiergas.com/deposit_control.html
Retailers of top tier gas (Hopefully you have one of these near you),
http://www.toptiergas.com/retailers.html
#344
Just in time to die
iTrader: (1)
Howard I think your rotors are exceptionally clean because of the AI. I think you are 100% on with your premix statements, however, I think just showing random pics of X-engine's rotors with so many miles is a bit pointless without knowing fuel type, port type, and A/f's. Just running premix and no OMP will certainly have different results than running the OMP or even OMP+premix. Same would be said though for running a car with 93 oct stock ports versus 100 oct street port, or 100 oct large street port. I'd even argue that back pressure in the manifold plays a good part in it. Your car had lower than normal exhaust manifold back pressure especially when compared to stock cars, or even cars running poor flowing cast type manifolds.
Keep in mind I agree with you on the premix versus crankcase oil thing though, no doubt it is the better way to go.
~S~
Keep in mind I agree with you on the premix versus crankcase oil thing though, no doubt it is the better way to go.
~S~
#345
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A good synthetic pre-mix such as Amsoil Interceptor is designed to burn cleanly in the combustion chanmber and contains detergent additives to mitigate carbon deposits.
http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/ait.aspx
Five years and counting for me mixed at 1/2 oz per gallon (as Idemitsu recommends for street applications).
http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/ait.aspx
Five years and counting for me mixed at 1/2 oz per gallon (as Idemitsu recommends for street applications).
#346
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correct. Even though I average 17-18 gallons per fill-up, I usually mix about 8 oz. Interceptor is great stuff. 1 oz per gallon will likely foul your plugs, unless you're at the track.
#347
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (4)
From what I've seen over the years, it's my opinion that premixing plays a fairly small part in the way of keeping rotary engines clean and healthy, compared to the benefits that auxiliary injection (water or meth), driving the car hard and getting a proper tune provide. From the pictures that Banzai Racing posted a few pages back, I'm going to venture a guess that the unnamed "traveling tuner" was Steve Kahn formerly of Gotham Racing. My engine was built by Gotham Racing and tuned by Steve Kahn a few years back and fell just short of 15,000 miles of very light driving before cracking a seal. I have a hard time driving the hell out of my cars, which I think played a part in the engines premature death. I haven't cracked the engine open yet, but when I get around to it (possibly next week) I suspect I'm going to see a lot of carbon and a chipped/cracked apex seal, again similar to the pictures that Banzai Racing posted.
#348
Turbo vert
iTrader: (33)
Interesting. The first thing I noticed about this picture aside from the lack of carbon was also the lack of luster - the rotor itself looks really, really dry, to the point of putting extra wear on moving parts? The rotor housing looks like it's pretty worn (lacking a lot of the chrome finish), can you comment on the mileage of the housings and the type of seals used in this motor?.
#350
was 150kfd
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: bay area, ca
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where's the OP on this thread? Long gone. Because maybe he realizes there's more than one way to skin a cat.
My motor died at 186k, went through two omp's and never premixed once. That's not the norm and I'm not building my next motor with the belief it will last half that long this time around.
I am losing the omp and adding a big fat "Premix!" sticker to my gas cap. The arguement why has been well-stated here.The greatest factor is that I'm gonna run a PFC now, which wont do jack if the omp goes bad. Premix ratio? Hmm, I'm of the belief that the useage of the car should be the deciding factor.
Once I crack open my 186k motor (which was mostly stock) will it be loaded with carbon? Probably. Will HC's motor last 186k? probably not. These damn rotaries have too many highly important ancilliary systems to have 100% science on anything.
That guy who's motor cracked at 15k after being built by GR and tuned by "The Man", I feel for you, bro. But there's something wrong with any motor that is broken after 15k of "light driving". That just aint right.
If you built up enough carbon in 15k WITH a proper tune then you gotta treat that as an anomaly. Apex seals are a bitch.
There's no reason not to get AI, IMO. Thats a bigger difference maker than omp or premix.
Guys in my Army unit would last the entire deployment without cleaning the carbon from their rifles. But, I would tell them that it works great until the moment it doesnt.
My motor died at 186k, went through two omp's and never premixed once. That's not the norm and I'm not building my next motor with the belief it will last half that long this time around.
I am losing the omp and adding a big fat "Premix!" sticker to my gas cap. The arguement why has been well-stated here.The greatest factor is that I'm gonna run a PFC now, which wont do jack if the omp goes bad. Premix ratio? Hmm, I'm of the belief that the useage of the car should be the deciding factor.
Once I crack open my 186k motor (which was mostly stock) will it be loaded with carbon? Probably. Will HC's motor last 186k? probably not. These damn rotaries have too many highly important ancilliary systems to have 100% science on anything.
That guy who's motor cracked at 15k after being built by GR and tuned by "The Man", I feel for you, bro. But there's something wrong with any motor that is broken after 15k of "light driving". That just aint right.
If you built up enough carbon in 15k WITH a proper tune then you gotta treat that as an anomaly. Apex seals are a bitch.
There's no reason not to get AI, IMO. Thats a bigger difference maker than omp or premix.
Guys in my Army unit would last the entire deployment without cleaning the carbon from their rifles. But, I would tell them that it works great until the moment it doesnt.