When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Me? Stock car = big negative. I'm basically only into genuine jdm tuner brands and stock / road going FD's generally 'do-it' for me anymore unless they're exceptionally special. Like that FEED Afflux v5 that recently sold for peanuts imo (which blew my f'ing mind btw!). If it were lhd, you'd be talking to the new owner. Now THAT is a vehicle WORTH owning. Super special, dare I say pedigree.
I thought this was originally a discussion around the perceived merits (or not) of limited production vehicles such as the ITR, FD / Supra RZ, NSX-R, etc (where they received a ton of extra engineering, etc as opposed to more commonly sourced models) and their current respective monetary value(s) compared to 'regular' models in today's market.
But has since turned into the 'why can't I put the '99 bumper on my car' instead.
I'm all for lhd 93-95's upgrading their front bumpers to aftermarket tuner kits, etc but implying that slapping on a '99 kit is just as 'natural, stock, period oem' is false. Now if we're talking about 'tuner' cars, then that's a very different story. If the stock car is what you admire, then you should keep it that way. If you prefer the '99 spec FD, then you should work towards ownership of a genuine one. And if it's outside of your realm, then you should accept your limitations (whatever they may be) and move on.
Who are you to say what people shouldand shouldn't do to their cars? You're playing a dangerous game when you use words like that. I understand why you feel the way you feel even though I disagree, but your word choices could be better.
A while back there was a thread where folk could post up their achieved sales price with quite a few data points.
I did a graph of that data and got an inverse bell curve.
Plotted against stated mileage, unmodified low Mile/Km cars achieved high prices, followed by higher mileage cars, and those with some modification, that showed a dip, but prices rose again for very high mileage cars with very extensive modifications.
I do not know how that curve would look applied to the last five years data.
But I suspect a shift even more in favor of unmodified low mileage examples, as the cars shift to being recognized as collectables.
According to the Collins Canadian English Dictionary, "natural", when used as an adjective can mean "normal" or "unaffected". In this context a modified S6 can be referred to as unnatural (not natural), a statement of fact, and not necessarily a pejorative.
So my use of the term "unnatrual" was not necessarily unnatural.
Sorry for any miss-understanding my use of the term "unnatural" may have caused.
If this is the "dolphin tail" spoiler, then it is amazing how tastes can differ - you hate it and I think it was one of the best!!
And it's basically the original OEM spoiler with floating ends - the (inboard) mounting points are the same, same profile, width, and height - just without the return to the body and the outboard mounting points.
That's the one, yeap. Can we be an internet oddity, and disagree, but still respect one another and appreciate our differences in opinion, and that variety is the spice of life? ;-).
That's the one, yeap. Can we be an internet oddity, and disagree, but still respect one another and appreciate our differences in opinion, and that variety is the spice of life? ;-).
I still think we have ways to go. There is no reason these cars should be cheaper than MKIV Supras, other than perhaps the availability of shops with rotary expertise.
FD guys always forget the Turbo Supras are much more rare. I’ve owned both and driven tons of both. I prefer the FD, but outside of the front aesthetics of the Supra it’s a phenomenal car that earned its reputation as the true king of the 90s japanese sports cars.
FD guys always forget the Turbo Supras are much more rare. I’ve owned both and driven tons of both. I prefer the FD, but outside of the front aesthetics of the Supra it’s a phenomenal car that earned its reputation as the true king of the 90s japanese sports cars.
Add to this the various upgrades in brakes, turbos, etc that the USDM Supras have VS the cookie cutter (though awesome) FD trims that are now importable makes for a value add that stock FDs as a whole will never come close to.
Also. Take a stock twin turbo Supra with 6 speed almost unbreakable trans. Exhaust, intercooler, boost controller to 18psi, and fuel cut eliminator, stock ecu, and boom, 420-450whp without any effort or risk of blowing engine.
That is what made supras famous before the big single turbos and aftermarket ecu's came around. Stock fuel system, stock coils, stock ecu.
Don't get me wrong, I'll take an FD any day. But the ease of modification and increasing power significantly with little expense was amazing for the time.
Also. Take a stock twin turbo Supra with 6 speed almost unbreakable trans. Exhaust, intercooler, boost controller to 18psi, and fuel cut eliminator, stock ecu, and boom, 420-450whp without any effort or risk of blowing engine.
That is what made supras famous before the big single turbos and aftermarket ecu's came around. Stock fuel system, stock coils, stock ecu.
Don't get me wrong, I'll take an FD any day. But the ease of modification and increasing power significantly with little expense was amazing for the time.
This is very true.
Really chaps my *** that Mazda didn't do a good enough job on the FD's ECU. A small amount of over building and a LOT of engines could have been saved. If nothing else if it would have pulled back on timing if boost goes over 10psi or if they had fuel maps for more boost or SOMETHING this would have helped tremendously.
That's really where the FD got the bad reputation. Put on intake/exhaust/downpipe/muffler and you have a time bomb.
I think the Supra earned its reputation. It's also earned its value.
Anybody have an opinion on what I should do with a 93 SSM touring with ~35K miles. Should I sell it as a roller or put in with a new OEM engine, wiring harness, clutch, ect. Assuming it will need greater than $10K in parts/ labor to get it up and running.
It was earmarked for a 20B I have, but prices seem like its a good time to let it go....
This was posted elsewhere. Is it an S6 with an S8 wing (or mazdaspeed?), or the other way around?
In any event it looks fierce.
I think that's a full blown MS aero on a 92, detail here.
Originally Posted by Mdessouki
Anybody have an opinion on what I should do with a 93 SSM touring with ~35K miles. Should I sell it as a roller or put in with a new OEM engine, wiring harness, clutch, ect. Assuming it will need greater than $10K in parts/ labor to get it up and running.
It was earmarked for a 20B I have, but prices seem like its a good time to let it go....
What's missing? I would find someone who would love to put it back on the road, $10k is a low cost compare to what these things are going for with 3x the mileage. I would take it if I don't already have 2
Last edited by ZE Power MX6; Mar 18, 2022 at 12:19 PM.
I think that's a full blown MS aero on a 92, detail here.
What's missing? I would find someone who would love to put it back on the road, $10k is a low cost compare to what these things are going for with 3x the mileage. I would take it if I don't already have 2
I held on the tb, uim and lim and tranny. Almost everything else is gone.