3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

How to value your FD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-21, 01:45 PM
  #3526  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 916
Received 230 Likes on 168 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
LOL.......my biased thought on surpa vs FD. The dyno queen fatty will one day be surpassed by the razor sharp handling waif with the unique engine, who also happens to be hot as eff! Here's to us FD lovers and hope, CHEERS!!!!

If I could pick one car from japan to put on a shelf it would be the FD.
In 1998 I was in between a rx7 Fd and a Supra. At ths end of the day I picked the Fd for all the reasons Fritz mentioned. I dont regret my decision and i will still pick the rx7 over the Supra. I really dont understand why someone would pay more for a Supra than an rx7. I think the rx7 is very undervalued. The supra is a nice car but the rx7 is a real drivers car. In my eyes the rx7 should be worth more than the fat boy toyota.
The following users liked this post:
Fritz Flynn (04-12-21)
Old 04-12-21, 08:34 AM
  #3527  
All out Track Freak!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by spintriangles
In 1998 I was in between a rx7 Fd and a Supra. At ths end of the day I picked the Fd for all the reasons Fritz mentioned. I dont regret my decision and i will still pick the rx7 over the Supra. I really dont understand why someone would pay more for a Supra than an rx7. I think the rx7 is very undervalued. The supra is a nice car but the rx7 is a real drivers car. In my eyes the rx7 should be worth more than the fat boy toyota.
When these cars 1st came out I was at Martha Jefferson Hospital in Charlottesville driving through the multi level parking lot and on the 1st floor there was a black FD and black Supra sitting side by side. I pulled over put the flashers on and looked at those cars for a good minute. I'll never forget it, and yes, the FD killed it then and remains the GOAT!
The following 3 users liked this post by Fritz Flynn:
DaleClark (04-12-21), j9fd3s (04-14-21), RX7gp (04-12-21)
Old 04-12-21, 09:47 AM
  #3528  
Senior Member

 
RX7gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pa USA
Posts: 266
Received 132 Likes on 61 Posts
About a year after I bought my FD (in July of '93) my brother and I were at a local car show and they had a Supra on display. Gave me a chance to sit in the car and look it over closely. My conclusion then, and even more true today, was that the FD was a way better looking car both inside and out. To me the Supra was bloated on the outside, boring wheel design, and the interior dash was plain and uninspired. I'm sure the interior material quality was better (how couldn't it be) but I walked away with no regret having the FD in my garage.
The following users liked this post:
Fritz Flynn (04-12-21)
Old 04-12-21, 11:33 AM
  #3529  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (8)
 
dguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sb
Posts: 1,478
Received 215 Likes on 161 Posts
So...I wonder when the title of this thread will be change?
Old 04-12-21, 12:42 PM
  #3530  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (26)
 
Redbul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: B.C.
Posts: 5,112
Received 1,231 Likes on 960 Posts
Changing the title would make all the prior discussions seem off.
Old 04-12-21, 01:17 PM
  #3531  
Rotorhead for life

iTrader: (4)
 
Pete_89T2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 1,867
Received 1,038 Likes on 592 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7gp
About a year after I bought my FD (in July of '93) my brother and I were at a local car show and they had a Supra on display. Gave me a chance to sit in the car and look it over closely. My conclusion then, and even more true today, was that the FD was a way better looking car both inside and out. To me the Supra was bloated on the outside, boring wheel design, and the interior dash was plain and uninspired. I'm sure the interior material quality was better (how couldn't it be) but I walked away with no regret having the FD in my garage.
^Agree 100%. If the FD had one fault, it's that the interior quality, fit & finish was crap, even in comparison to the prior generation RX7's like the FC. I know Mazda was obsessed with weight savings when they designed the FD, but damn, making the plastics maybe a little bit thicker and have better finishes/textures doesn't add that much weight and would have made the cabins much nicer to live with. Especially when Mazda was marketing the FD as it's up market halo car (they had the Miata for sports car buyers on a budget).
The following users liked this post:
RX7gp (04-12-21)
Old 04-12-21, 03:56 PM
  #3532  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (8)
 
dguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sb
Posts: 1,478
Received 215 Likes on 161 Posts
Originally Posted by Redbul
Changing the title would make all the prior discussions seem off.

Woosh.
Old 04-12-21, 07:46 PM
  #3533  
Auto Enthusiast
 
MarcZ55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Southern California
Posts: 211
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts

Pretty interesting last few listings.. i think most felt the 95 would clear $50k including myself. Imagine that.. a touring MB with tan interior had the highest of the 3 🤔
Old 04-13-21, 12:47 AM
  #3534  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (26)
 
Redbul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: B.C.
Posts: 5,112
Received 1,231 Likes on 960 Posts
BC Spot the trend

Originally Posted by dguy
Woosh.
Woosh indeed!


The Bring a trailer data shows a clear floor of US$20,000 since last year, but the $25,000 hurdle has still applied in many case. Median trend is likely breaching $30,000.







Last edited by Redbul; 04-13-21 at 12:50 AM. Reason: added info.
Old 04-13-21, 09:25 AM
  #3535  
All out Track Freak!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by Redbul
Woosh indeed!


The Bring a trailer data shows a clear floor of US$20,000 since last year, but the $25,000 hurdle has still applied in many case. Median trend is likely breaching $30,000.






YEP, again I started this thread because I was seeing a lot FDs listed for 30k plus with 100k plus miles and stupid mods. Those same FDs today might sell for 25k.

Low mileage and stock will trump everything else.

The 95 auction was one of the better cars/deals I've seen recently on BAT. The MB was not.

I'm still waiting to see what a really nice low mileage (under 20k miles) base 94 or R2 sells for at this time. The current collector/used car market is in a bubble so hopefully we'll see something decent sell soon to get an idea of just how FAT the bubble is.



The following 2 users liked this post by Fritz Flynn:
IRPerformance (04-13-21), ZE Power MX6 (04-13-21)
Old 04-13-21, 01:04 PM
  #3536  
Eh

iTrader: (56)
 
djseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,544
Received 333 Likes on 189 Posts
Originally Posted by MarcZ55

Pretty interesting last few listings.. i think most felt the 95 would clear $50k including myself. Imagine that.. a touring MB with tan interior had the highest of the 3 🤔
20k less miles on the MB car and completely bone stock. BAT really favors the absolutely stock cars which I guess I understand but also feel sad for the owners. Full bolt on sequential FDs are still a blast to drive after getting out of a newer 911/vette etc. A bone stock FD is far less thrilling.
The following 2 users liked this post by djseven:
GoodfellaFD3S (04-14-21), OldDude (04-13-21)
Old 04-13-21, 02:40 PM
  #3537  
The bomb is in the toy!1!

iTrader: (4)
 
cloud9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 2,188
Received 268 Likes on 157 Posts
Originally Posted by djseven
A bone stock FD is far less thrilling.
Couldn't agree more. Bone stock cars are held on a pedestal but a few bolt ons and reliability bits dramatically change the experience for the better. I'm sure there are people that disagree but for me, once you feel the difference there's no going back.
The following 3 users liked this post by cloud9:
djseven (04-14-21), GoodfellaFD3S (04-14-21), OldDude (04-13-21)
Old 04-13-21, 03:04 PM
  #3538  
Built Not Bought

iTrader: (14)
 
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 4,260
Likes: 0
Received 862 Likes on 544 Posts
resto-mods usually trail the bone stock category in value and timing. If the current trend keeps ups, you'll eventually see resto-mod (super clean with a few bolt ones) not be penalized quite as much for not being bone stock.

But take that with a grain of salt. I just watch a few Barrett Jackson auctions from time to time, far from and expert.
Old 04-13-21, 06:47 PM
  #3539  
Senior Member

 
RX7gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pa USA
Posts: 266
Received 132 Likes on 61 Posts
well my experience is that a bone stock FD, when fresh and running properly, is/was plenty thrilling.
Old 04-13-21, 08:50 PM
  #3540  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
aplscrambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 481
Received 87 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn

The 95 auction was one of the better cars/deals I've seen recently on BAT. The MB was not.

I'm still waiting to see what a really nice low mileage (under 20k miles) base 94 or R2 sells for at this time. The current collector/used car market is in a bubble so hopefully we'll see something decent sell soon to get an idea of just how FAT the bubble is.
You had my interest on the VR 95 that just sold on BAT so I had to look it up. Appeared to be a really clean, well set up driver for an enthusiast that doesn't mind tan and a sunroof. Glad to see a modified, moderate mileage touring going for collector grade money. It's a win for all of us.
Old 04-13-21, 09:35 PM
  #3541  
Auto Enthusiast
 
MarcZ55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Southern California
Posts: 211
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by djseven
20k less miles on the MB car and completely bone stock. BAT really favors the absolutely stock cars which I guess I understand but also feel sad for the owners. Full bolt on sequential FDs are still a blast to drive after getting out of a newer 911/vette etc. A bone stock FD is far less thrilling.
Yep no doubt, bone stock lower mileage cars are king on BaT (thus far). I really felt the 95 would hit 50k, last USDM model and far less made but hey that's the magic of an auction.
Don't feel sad tho, I find my stock FD a freaking blast to drive, puts a smile on my face every time I take it out. Not to say a lightly modded one isn't better but just haven't felt the need too....yet.

Last edited by MarcZ55; 04-13-21 at 09:45 PM.
The following users liked this post:
djseven (04-14-21)
Old 04-14-21, 12:11 AM
  #3542  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (26)
 
Redbul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: B.C.
Posts: 5,112
Received 1,231 Likes on 960 Posts
BC How it feels on the inside

The topic of the weak interior plastics has come up again (with good reason). But i wonder if anyone on here can recount what the interior felt new, and how quickly the weaknesses began to show.

I have spent considerable time refurbishing my interior and each time I replace an aged piece with a better one, repair broken tabs, eliminate squeaks and rattles, the more solid the car feels. I have spent $10,000 on the motor, $5000 on the suspension, but the time and money spent on making the car feel more like a GT than a racecar, by fixing up the interior, probably has contributed equally to my satisfaction. Going all the way back to stock exhaust, has been a treat. Zoom-zoom!
The following users liked this post:
djseven (04-14-21)
Old 04-14-21, 12:30 AM
  #3543  
Senior Member


iTrader: (4)
 
Nakd n Fearless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 378
Received 76 Likes on 54 Posts
FD interiors = cheap plastics

Black interiors = hidden filth

hidden filth = COVID19
Old 04-14-21, 09:12 AM
  #3544  
All out Track Freak!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7gp
well my experience is that a bone stock FD, when fresh and running properly, is/was plenty thrilling.
My DD is a bone stock FD with PFS springs and sways and I love driving it. I dread rainy days because I hate rain and because I have to drive the truck.


The following users liked this post:
RX7gp (04-14-21)
Old 04-14-21, 09:14 AM
  #3545  
All out Track Freak!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by aplscrambles
You had my interest on the VR 95 that just sold on BAT so I had to look it up. Appeared to be a really clean, well set up driver for an enthusiast that doesn't mind tan and a sunroof. Glad to see a modified, moderate mileage touring going for collector grade money. It's a win for all of us.
YEP, that was a very good car
Old 04-14-21, 09:19 AM
  #3546  
All out Track Freak!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by MarcZ55
Yep no doubt, bone stock lower mileage cars are king on BaT (thus far). I really felt the 95 would hit 50k, last USDM model and far less made but hey that's the magic of an auction.
Don't feel sad tho, I find my stock FD a freaking blast to drive, puts a smile on my face every time I take it out. Not to say a lightly modded one isn't better but just haven't felt the need too....yet.
YEP, given the current market the buyer could have done a lot worse.

Old 04-14-21, 09:22 AM
  #3547  
All out Track Freak!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by Redbul
The topic of the weak interior plastics has come up again (with good reason). But i wonder if anyone on here can recount what the interior felt new, and how quickly the weaknesses began to show.

I have spent considerable time refurbishing my interior and each time I replace an aged piece with a better one, repair broken tabs, eliminate squeaks and rattles, the more solid the car feels. I have spent $10,000 on the motor, $5000 on the suspension, but the time and money spent on making the car feel more like a GT than a racecar, by fixing up the interior, probably has contributed equally to my satisfaction. Going all the way back to stock exhaust, has been a treat. Zoom-zoom!
If you are careful the 94/95 interiors hold up really well. 93 interiors just suck and there is no getting around lots of replacement even if it's just from scratches etc....

When you take apart a 94 or 95 you'll see a lot changes, not just the surface covering of the consoles but things like reinforced trans tunnel cover etc....
Old 04-14-21, 09:55 AM
  #3548  
Senior Member

 
RX7gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pa USA
Posts: 266
Received 132 Likes on 61 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
If you are careful the 94/95 interiors hold up really well. 93 interiors just suck and there is no getting around lots of replacement even if it's just from scratches etc....

When you take apart a 94 or 95 you'll see a lot changes, not just the surface covering of the consoles but things like reinforced trans tunnel cover etc....
Have to agree on the '93 interior. Even when new it was pretty bad. Closing the door rattled and squeaked even at zero miles. My plastics held up very well until about 2 or 3 years ago, but I was always REALLY careful, and as the only driver all these years I could "manage" their fragility. But in general it was always a noisy interior. I had heard back in the day that the 94's were upgraded in many ways to address these shortcomings. I've never driven a 94, let alone taken one apart, but thanks for confirming, Fritz.
Old 04-14-21, 10:02 AM
  #3549  
Senior Member

 
RX7gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pa USA
Posts: 266
Received 132 Likes on 61 Posts
Gotta add that I much prefer the look of the finish on the 93 plastics vs the grainy 94/95 finish, at least when it's new. Just don't touch it!
Old 04-14-21, 10:08 AM
  #3550  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,904
Received 2,646 Likes on 1,874 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
When these cars 1st came out I was at Martha Jefferson Hospital in Charlottesville driving through the multi level parking lot and on the 1st floor there was a black FD and black Supra sitting side by side. I pulled over put the flashers on and looked at those cars for a good minute. I'll never forget it, and yes, the FD killed it then and remains the GOAT!
we should do a "first time i saw an FD" thread.

mine was either a silver/red touring at a dealership (so i got to sit in it!!!!) or a CYM that had pulled into this entrance to our shopping center,, these would have both been sometime in 1992
The following users liked this post:
ptrhahn (04-14-21)


Quick Reply: How to value your FD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.