2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Trying to think of differemt way to activate sixth ports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #1  
Brodie121's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 848
Likes: 7
From: BC, Canada
Question Trying to think of differemt way to activate sixth ports

I was thinking that if you had something like my posted image, would this create enough pressure to activate the ports? Im just thinking that the exhaust velocity would create a pressure difference when it enters the tube, its hard to explain typing it out...

Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #2  
1SWEET7's Avatar
Now With 10th AE Fun!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 1
From: CA
Well that is exactly how the S4 N/A system works from the factory.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #3  
satch's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,738
Likes: 16
From: tulsa,ok.
Or this: http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/2n...elec6port.html
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:04 PM
  #4  
jackhild59's Avatar
Rotary $ > AMG $
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 30
From: And the horse he rode in on...
Drawing that picture in paint was harder than reading and learning...
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #5  
Brodie121's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 848
Likes: 7
From: BC, Canada
I know how it works, i may be getting a header that doesnt have a split air tube, so i was thinking of welding something like this in to activate the ports, my post probably made no sense whatsoever. im just thinking since i wont have much back pressure i could make up for it with exhaust flow creating a pressure difference as it enters the smaller tube.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #6  
jackhild59's Avatar
Rotary $ > AMG $
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 30
From: And the horse he rode in on...
Originally Posted by Brodie121
I know how it works, i may be getting a header that doesnt have a split air tube, so i was thinking of welding something like this in to activate the ports, my post probably made no sense whatsoever. im just thinking since i wont have much back pressure i could make up for it with exhaust flow creating a pressure difference as it enters the smaller tube.

Oh, I get it. A different way to activate the 6th ports- exactly like all S4 headers have...
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #7  
Brodie121's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 848
Likes: 7
From: BC, Canada
In your opinion would welding something like this into an aftermarket header be enough to activate the ports,or should i just spend the extra and do electronic activation? I guess my use of "different" doesnt really fit.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
If you have an idea that involves ms paint then it's probably garbage.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:03 PM
  #9  
kustomizingkid's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 366
Likes: 1
From: USA
The way my friends NA is...

Ford electric vacuum pump scavenged from a junkyard, lines go from it to the actuators.
MSD window switch the turns a relay on and off at 3XXXrpms... he can adjust it to where he wants it...
Vacuum pump is tirggered, they open, everything works...
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:04 PM
  #10  
ATRON3000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
**** that is harsh, but funny

the electronic way will give you better control of when it opens
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #11  
Brodie121's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 848
Likes: 7
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by kustomizingkid
The way my friends NA is...

Ford electric vacuum pump scavenged from a junkyard, lines go from it to the actuators.
MSD window switch the turns a relay on and off at 3XXXrpms... he can adjust it to where he wants it...
Vacuum pump is tirggered, they open, everything works...
it would have to be a pressure pump as opposed to a vacuum pump correct?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
just remover them. ****, take the intake manifold off, remove them, the rods, and the actuators. end of headache.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:23 PM
  #13  
Brodie121's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 848
Likes: 7
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
just remover them. ****, take the intake manifold off, remove them, the rods, and the actuators. end of headache.
If i where to do that what would i lose under say 4000 rpm? And does fuel economy go down? Is it as big of a loss in performance down low as ive read or is it just one of those over hyped things
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #14  
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
Manual Rack
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 1
From: Wanaque NJ
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
just remover them. ****, take the intake manifold off, remove them, the rods, and the actuators. end of headache.
Its more of a headache to remove the manifolds and ect then it is worth fixing them properly.

They are removed on my n/a by the previous owner. I would never suggest doing that. Overall lose of low end power with no extra high end power. Also fuel mileage does decrease. Mazda put them there for a reason....
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #15  
blwn rtr 89''s Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Americas High Five
u should just fart into them
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 09:48 AM
  #16  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
Originally Posted by FelixIsGod29X
Its more of a headache to remove the manifolds and ect then it is worth fixing them properly.

They are removed on my n/a by the previous owner. I would never suggest doing that. Overall lose of low end power with no extra high end power. Also fuel mileage does decrease. Mazda put them there for a reason....
i did that as well with completely opposite **** happening.
i actually made way more hp as well.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #17  
FC_EDDIE's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
By removing them you will definitely lose a bit of low end power but you will feel the difference in a higher RPM range. I guess the question should be: What type of driving are you trying to do? I road raced my car so taking them out was an advantage. Gas mileage will get a tiny bit worse...

If this is your daily driver, fix them.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #18  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
i did that as well with completely opposite **** happening.
i actually made way more hp as well.
lol

ok...say you have two racecars that are identical in every way except for there engines. Car 1 removed his 6ports and makes more HP than car 2. Car 2 kept his 6 ports and makes less HP than car 1. Suppose these ms paint dyno graphs represent the power outputs. Which car is faster?

Attached Thumbnails Trying to think of differemt way to activate sixth ports-dumb.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #19  
Brodie121's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 848
Likes: 7
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by PvillKnight7
lol

ok...say you have two racecars that are identical in every way except for there engines. Car 1 removed his 6ports and makes more HP than car 2. Car 2 kept his 6 ports and makes less HP than car 1. Suppose these ms paint dyno graphs represent the power outputs. Which car is faster?

car 2
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #20  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
we can speculate all day, but im firm on my answer.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #21  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
i did that as well with completely opposite **** happening.
i actually made way more hp as well.
in my experience the exhaust makes a huge difference.

i did this on a 1st gen with an FC engine. with a short header and 1.75" pipe to the muffler, open 6 ports killed ALL the power under 4500, it SUCKED.

putting on the long primary 2" pipe system, power from idle to 4000 with the 6 ports open was about the same as the short system with the 6 ports hooked up.

hooking up the 6 ports with the good exhaust was the best overall
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #22  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
i know what ya saying, but i did not have a stock FC at all. megasquirted with a full exhaust. made some nice hp with everything removed.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #23  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
I did the electric air pump thing (unreliable over time) and I did the aux ports wired open thing (annoying to drive around town).

My advice to you is this: recreate the s5 setup in a way by using the smog pump. Use an rtek 2.1's rpm switch capability to activate a 2 way solenoid valve to control air to the actuators, kind of like the FD or s5 boost control solenoid. Feed the solenoid with air from the factory smog pump. That will be bulletproof (if the sleeves still rotate) and adjustable, without a box under the hood. You'll have fuel, timing, and aux port control for the cost of the Rtek and some OEM parts. FD boost control solenoids are cheap plentiful, and so are FC smog pumps.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #24  
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
Manual Rack
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 1
From: Wanaque NJ
Originally Posted by blwn rtr 89'
u should just fart into them


And you should go back to the dirty glove that you came from.


Originally Posted by SirCygnus
i know what ya saying, but i did not have a stock FC at all. megasquirted with a full exhaust. made some nice hp with everything removed.
The mods you have make up for the aux porting being removed i suppose.

Also car #2 would be better IMHO, you have ALMOST the same high end power without the loss of low end power. Ive heard many times before if you have 2 n/a rx7s that are exactly the same but one has the aux ports and ones doesn't, then the one with the aux ports would have a better chance winning in a race.

To the OP: if your car is mostly stock and is daily driven then stick with the aux ports and be happy...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ryanschneider2006
Introduce yourself
5
Nov 14, 2015 01:34 PM
FührerTüner
The Bad & Fugly Members
5
Sep 29, 2015 06:56 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM
MXAXTXT
Comments and Suggestions Archive
0
Sep 12, 2015 08:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.