General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year

reliability?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-02, 12:54 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reliability?

Hello. Over the past few months I have become more and more fond of these rx-7's. There is one problem, my Dad doesnt want me getting one. HE said he remembers back when the wankel motors were being produced how many horror stories he heard. He says he doesn't know them that well so he can't work on them, and "no one around here knows anything about them" (I live in Kansas City, Missouri). So are they really unreliable? ARe they extremely high maintanance? Well please help out a bit. Thanks


Logan
Old 05-29-02, 02:53 AM
  #2  
the torquinator

iTrader: (1)
 
theNeanderthol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
They are actually very reliable if you treat them right. Some 13b six ports have gone over 200,000 miles without a rebuild with just regular maintinence. The 2nd gen rx-7 are probably the most reliable of the bunch, but I'm a first gen guy myself.
Old 05-29-02, 12:46 PM
  #3  
gross polluter

iTrader: (2)
 
Tom93R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,759
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
non-turbo rotaries can go forever. There really isn't alot that can go wrong with them internally other than seals getting old and wearing out. Never have to worry about valve adjustment, head gasket, etc. Externally they have the same systems as a piston motor. As long as you change the oil and don't overheat there is no reason a N/A rotary won't go 200k miles.
Old 05-29-02, 03:46 PM
  #4  
Full Member

 
MisterMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, I've got an 1989 RX7 n/a (non turbo). It has served me well, and it's really reliable. I just bought my second car, and it's also a non-turbo RX7 (1986)...so that should tell you something!
Old 05-29-02, 11:47 PM
  #5  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im looking at the fc's, but Id like a turbo one, unless reliability is down the tubes on those. What were the n/a models for them? Isnt GSL turbo? How fast are the non-turbos? I will be modifying it. I just love the rx7, magnificent cars.


Logan
Old 05-30-02, 08:31 PM
  #6  
5yr member, joined 2001

 
JONSKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Marco Island, FL
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you've got a thick wallet or if you're a rotary mechanic, then get a 3rd gen. This car is AMAZING! I've got 101K on the original engine and about 30K on rebuilt turbos. I'm in the process of learning how to maintain the car myself.
Old 05-31-02, 02:48 AM
  #7  
Full Member

 
xiaomingming50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drive a 1987 na fc, great learning car, bought it from people who maintained it very well, 156k miles and counting.
Old 05-31-02, 03:30 AM
  #8  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,504
Received 414 Likes on 295 Posts
My '80 had 119k on it and ran like a champ when I pulled the engine to swap in something with a bit more power.

My '85 has over 150k on it and is still going strong, doesn't even have dowel O-ring leakage. Smokes a hair on cold startup but it's barely noticeable. Ironically the '80 engine is getting ported and will get stuffed into the '85 And then the '85 engine will probably get ported and stuffed into my NEXT 1st-gen... it's the circle of life I guess
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
08-06-17 01:41 PM
SRTx781
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
12-19-15 07:30 PM



Quick Reply: reliability?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.