Build Threads The place to discuss complete builds

My PT6265 build...

Old Dec 17, 2009 | 07:36 PM
  #1  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
My PT6265 build...

I bought the car, one of the solenoids was messed up, and the 2nd turbo wasn't coming online, so I decided to go with a single turbo setup for reliability and performance reasons, I'm hoping to make around 470rwhp

The turbo has a .96 hotside, and is ball bearing as well, hopefully I see decent spool, if not, I'll go to a divided 1.00 hotside. I'm running 850/1300 setup with the FPD delete, as well as a rewired 255 in the tank....among many other supporting mods. Also gonna go the route of 'dudesmann's water injection setup preturbo....gonna see what the car will do on 93 octane and WI...I'd be happy with an 18psi tune.















Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 12:18 AM
  #2  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
Looks like you have a divided manifold (typical eBay manifold?), why in the world would you go .96 NON-DIVIDED? You realize a 1.00 divided turbine housing on a divided manifold spools FASTER and makes MORE power? Even a .84 divided would have worked better then the .96 (much quicker spool with roughly same peak power under 1 bar of boost). It's a win win.

Sweet heat shield BTW and nice plumbing work and great choice of turbo (aside form the turbine housing).
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 01:56 AM
  #3  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 1
From: Arctic Circle
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
Looks like you have a divided manifold (typical eBay manifold?), why in the world would you go .96 NON-DIVIDED? You realize a 1.00 divided turbine housing on a divided manifold spools FASTER and makes MORE power? Even a .84 divided would have worked better then the .96 (much quicker spool with roughly same peak power under 1 bar of boost). It's a win win.

Sweet heat shield BTW and nice plumbing work and great choice of turbo (aside form the turbine housing).
The .96 is standard from PTE, the 1.00 divided isnt. He is saving money off the bat and seeing if spool is good enough, and if not, he can spend the extra and get a different housing. And the 1.00 isnt likely to make much if any more power than the .96.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 02:39 AM
  #4  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
Looks like you have a divided manifold (typical eBay manifold?), why in the world would you go .96 NON-DIVIDED? You realize a 1.00 divided turbine housing on a divided manifold spools FASTER and makes MORE power? Even a .84 divided would have worked better then the .96 (much quicker spool with roughly same peak power under 1 bar of boost). It's a win win.

Sweet heat shield BTW and nice plumbing work and great choice of turbo (aside form the turbine housing).
ScorpionT answered it pretty well for me...I'd probably never run an .84...more heat and a crippled top end isn't worth the gains in spool.

To comment on the manifold yes it's the ebay manifold, I'm going to run it until it cracks. I have seen some who have had issues with them, and I have seen others who haven't had a problem at all. I just can't justify spending $1000+ on an exhaust manifold with probably less material cost and half the labor to make when compared to the exhaust manifold options during my 4 cylinder days of equal craftsmanship. Ill take my risk before digging into my resources.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 05:14 AM
  #5  
w94rx7tt's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 1
From: Franklin, Tennessee
Good luck with the build. I am in the process of a 6765 build. Quick question... don't you think you will be close to maxing out that one fuel pump if you're looking to make around 470hp? why not just spend an extra hundo and ride out? also I don't think you will have an issue with spool time. its all pretty relative anyway.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 08:22 AM
  #6  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Neat build!

Is the heat shield one of those universal stainless steel bowls you see in the cheap tool stores? Always wanted to hack one up or tack a couple together for that purpose......if not please divulge its origin

This engine is all stock? No porting etc? Will be a good platform to see how these precision turbos spin up.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 08:34 AM
  #7  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
Yeah that's a stainless pot heatshield, you can tell. pretty neat
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #8  
Rotary?Cool's Avatar
top row 2nd from left..me
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Originally Posted by hondahater
Yeah that's a stainless pot heatshield, you can tell. pretty neat
LOL! I could steal one of those from my Moms kitchen. Is it just floating there or is it bolted down?
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #9  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
Originally Posted by TheAsset
I'd probably never run an .84...more heat and a crippled top end isn't worth the gains in spool.
If you were running a larger turbo I'd agree. But seeing as I've seen plenty of 500whp+ cars on a P-trim .84 divided. I'll kindly disagree. Last one on the dyno here did 423@15psi on a stock unopened TII. Never fell flat. No crippled anything. Not knocking your build in any way. Just saying a .84 divided turbine is good for over 500whp at reasonable boost levels, and I'm sure ScorpionT will be the first to point out that a precision 65 will outperform the standard P-trim At least that's what precision tells us.

~S~
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #10  
rx7-lover's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Oslo
Nice
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #11  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by w94rx7tt
Good luck with the build. I am in the process of a 6765 build. Quick question... don't you think you will be close to maxing out that one fuel pump if you're looking to make around 470hp? why not just spend an extra hundo and ride out? also I don't think you will have an issue with spool time. its all pretty relative anyway.
I will probably end up upgrading the 2nd fuel rail, getting a 2nd pump, and putting 1600's in...I'm just not really sure on the limits of the stock FPR or when an upgrade is actually necessary, I've been getting mixed results while searching on here, Ill probably email the tuner and see what he prefers for my power goals

Originally Posted by classicauto
Neat build!

Is the heat shield one of those universal stainless steel bowls you see in the cheap tool stores? Always wanted to hack one up or tack a couple together for that purpose......if not please divulge its origin

This engine is all stock? No porting etc? Will be a good platform to see how these precision turbos spin up.
The engine has a mild SP from PFS, the pot is just a little $12 gig I bought from Target here, I mocked it up and drilled the holes to mount it, Ill pop a few pics of that process up.

Originally Posted by Zero R
If you were running a larger turbo I'd agree. But seeing as I've seen plenty of 500whp+ cars on a P-trim .84 divided. I'll kindly disagree. Last one on the dyno here did 423@15psi on a stock unopened TII. Never fell flat. No crippled anything. Not knocking your build in any way. Just saying a .84 divided turbine is good for over 500whp at reasonable boost levels, and I'm sure ScorpionT will be the first to point out that a precision 65 will outperform the standard P-trim At least that's what precision tells us.

~S~
Smaller hotside = more heat...regardless of the performance I was aiming more towards reliability in terms of reducing heat as much as possible...Ill sacrifice a little spool time. I as well am not knocking the .84 hotside, but I know its probably the lower limit for hotside choice, I just enjoy a little foreplay before the fun begins
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #12  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
After doing some chatting, I guess ill shoot for 410-420rwhp with this setup, otherwise I'd need to upgrade to 1600's, add another pump, and a FPR to the setup to dance around the 500rwhp area, and that's easily another $400 I don't feel like spending :/ I guess Ill see what I can get out of the fuel setup I have at the moment (Reweired 255 -->850/1300 -->FPD Delete)
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 09:46 PM
  #13  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Finally got the downpipe fitted how I like it, it'll be getting welded tomorrow. The little cardboard box is probably where I'll try and fit a reservoir for my water injection, just gonna see if I can find something that dimension. Piping should be done real soon once I get a hold of a 2.5" 45 degree coupler.





Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 11:28 PM
  #14  
BigTurbo74's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
I'm loving that heat shield!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 11:32 PM
  #15  
Indian's Avatar
It wasn't me!!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Cayman Islands
whats the square box for?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 11:40 PM
  #16  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by BigTurbo74
I'm loving that heat shield!
Yea I can't wait to see what it does with some real heat under it.

Originally Posted by Indian
whats the square box for?
I was figuring out what size reservoir I was going to run for the water injection. That box ended up being 8x5x5 roughly. I did a few calculations and it should sustain 350cc's at full tilt for more than a few minutes but we'll see what happens in the real world, if anything I may try running a reservoir where the coolant overflow is
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 09:20 PM
  #17  
LS1INSIDE's Avatar
94 Half Bridge 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Brookville Indiana
Looks awful tasty! i am in the process of doing a Billet PT6765 build, i went with the H cover .75/.96 AR turbo. the exhaust will be done tomorrow. getting a custom 4 inch from the turbo back. it was a real tight fit putting that turbo in! Hope it really screams, i should have pictures of it all tomorrow. I do enjoy me some precision turbos!
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #18  
ikpfal's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Havelock, NC
I'm in the middle of a 6265 build my self but due to no tuners around it might be awhile before I get running good. I also noticed your turbo is watercooled Precision is now going with a non watercooled chra. I will be shooting for the 500 mark myself.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 08:33 PM
  #19  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by ikpfal
I'm in the middle of a 6265 build my self but due to no tuners around it might be awhile before I get running good. I also noticed your turbo is watercooled Precision is now going with a non watercooled chra. I will be shooting for the 500 mark myself.
Yea I believe their new line is the GTX turbos or something along those lines, I feel more comfortable with coolant running through it as well.

I just really wish I could find a compressor map for the turbo, my roommate is running the same turbo on his motor (2JZ) with the .82 hotside and made 505rwhp at 18psi and 640rwhp at 25psi on race gas....What's the usual power difference between a piston and rotary motor?

Last edited by TheAsset; Jan 21, 2010 at 08:36 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 02:52 AM
  #20  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Its alive!!! ...Got a few kinks to workout but happy to hear her running again.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 08:16 AM
  #21  
Islander's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 814
Likes: 7
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by TheAsset
Yea I believe their new line is the GTX turbos or something along those lines, I feel more comfortable with coolant running through it as well.

I just really wish I could find a compressor map for the turbo, my roommate is running the same turbo on his motor (2JZ) with the .82 hotside and made 505rwhp at 18psi and 640rwhp at 25psi on race gas....What's the usual power difference between a piston and rotary motor?
Glad to see it done man. Enjoy the car to the max.

And as far as determining the hp difference in piston vs rotary look at a few of Howard Colemans threads. He breaks down each turbo and what it will make on different motors. I got a buddy with a 3.0l inline 6 in a bmw m3 that makes 600hp at 19psi on a gt4094. So we are way off from that.

Good luck man.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #22  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
"What's the usual power difference between a piston and rotary motor?"

based soley on equal AIRFLOW...

a 600 rwhp piston engine equates to a 462 rwhp rotary.

this does not necessarily put the rotary at a disadvantage as it will flow MORE air than a piston engine based on equal displacements. so you just run a larger turbo.

a GT4094 makes 80 pounds of air at 33 PSI. at 80 the rpm plot is vertical indicating the turbo is maxed out.

80 makes 800 piston hp and 615 rotary hp. (you just divide by 1.3... in other words,

80 times 10 = 800 piston hp divided by 1.3 = 615 rotary.

that's why we need to understand this when buying a turbo... we need to use OUR metrics.

howard
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #23  
Islander's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 814
Likes: 7
From: Charlotte NC
I knew you would chime in Howard. Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #24  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
"What's the usual power difference between a piston and rotary motor?"

based soley on equal AIRFLOW...

a 600 rwhp piston engine equates to a 462 rwhp rotary.

this does not necessarily put the rotary at a disadvantage as it will flow MORE air than a piston engine based on equal displacements. so you just run a larger turbo.

a GT4094 makes 80 pounds of air at 33 PSI. at 80 the rpm plot is vertical indicating the turbo is maxed out.

80 makes 800 piston hp and 615 rotary hp. (you just divide by 1.3... in other words,

80 times 10 = 800 piston hp divided by 1.3 = 615 rotary.

that's why we need to understand this when buying a turbo... we need to use OUR metrics.

howard
You're a good man Thanks for chiming in.

Ill def try and get some info and numbers up once I get the car tuned
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #25  
TheAsset's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
Car took it's first trip around the neighborhood today Waiting on the DLI/Wideband to show up and then all that's left on the list is the pumpless water injection and a tune. Feels good to get some face time in again haha
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.