Build Threads The place to discuss complete builds

Kilo Racing 3 Rotor FD Conversion

Old Dec 2, 2004 | 11:39 AM
  #501  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by HDP
Besides, the proper way would be to drive it for short periods then park it to cool completely.
This is the second time I've seen this. When did "heat cycling" become the break-in process for anything but track tires?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #502  
David Hayes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 188
From: FL
Yes!! We have success!!! I'm out the door now for the trip back to Jax. Will post a lot tomorrow, including pics and an initial dyno. Any guesses on RWHP and torque on the break in run? The dyno was run at a little under 6 PSI of boost and only up to 6,000 RPM.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #503  
Klar's Avatar
VVThat's meVV
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
280-320whp and 270-300wtq. What turbo are you running? I think I missed that part.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:45 PM
  #504  
bee's Avatar
bee
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Austin Tx
360 Rwhp??
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #505  
moehler's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
f*ck guessing, just tell us . I'm dying to know how your car turned out .
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 03:07 PM
  #506  
fd3s_rx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
From: Sac., CA
Originally Posted by moehler
f*ck guessing, just tell us . I'm dying to know how your car turned out .
hahaha,... for real.. and he's going to make us guess...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #507  
David Hayes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 188
From: FL
message from the road via my pda at chik fil a - the car is running flawlessly and i'm all smiles. the wolf ems makes the car run like stock - much more though on this tomorrow . i'll post the actual dyno then - come on, guessing is fun! fyi - i'm running the pettit 20b twin turbos in sequential.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 08:59 PM
  #508  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by David Hayes
message from the road via my pda at chik fil a - the car is running flawlessly and i'm all smiles. the wolf ems makes the car run like stock - much more though on this tomorrow . i'll post the actual dyno then - come on, guessing is fun! fyi - i'm running the pettit 20b twin turbos in sequential.


Sequencial as in the primary turbo transitioning over to the secondary? You mean to tell me that the Wolf ecu is able to run the 20b twins in sequencial mode? If this is true, that will make alot of 20b guys happy with their own DIY projects. Also do you have any cold starting issues?

Last edited by t-von; Dec 2, 2004 at 09:02 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #509  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
gee, would it be:

3 Rotors
2 Sequential Turbochargers
2.0 Liters
550 HP @ 7500 RPM
460 Lb-Ft @ 5500 RPM

...just a guess
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #510  
patriick's Avatar
FD enthusiast
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
6psi at 6000RPM... hmm, I'll guess 310rwhp
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #511  
paw140's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: Hattiesburg, MS
Originally Posted by weaklink
gee, would it be:

3 Rotors
2 Sequential Turbochargers
2.0 Liters
550 HP @ 7500 RPM
460 Lb-Ft @ 5500 RPM

...just a guess
At 6 psi? And under 6000 rpm?

I'd guess in the low 300's.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #512  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
Oh I'll guess

280 rwhp at around 6000
340 rwtq at around 4500
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #513  
the ancient words's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: closer
Originally Posted by jimlab
This is the second time I've seen this. When did "heat cycling" become the break-in process for anything but track tires?
Jim, I was always told "heat cycling" (i.e. short, moderately hard runs, not full throttle) were the best procedure for break-in http://www.mce-racing.com/techtalk/breakin.html
http://www.dragbike.com/news/01-99/drbrock-0199.htm http://www.lubeus.com/convertingtoamsoil.php

this link claims heat cycling is not important http://www.miata-power.com/engine-break-in.htm

I'd be interested to hear what you think and/or expereinces....it is interesting that use of syntheitc oils for break-in is discouraged by most "experts"
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #514  
the ancient words's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: closer
my guess is 320 at the wheels at 6 psi
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #515  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by the ancient words
I'd be interested to hear what you think and/or expereinces....it is interesting that use of syntheitc oils for break-in is discouraged by most "experts"
I've always heard that initial break-in should be done with natural oil vs. synthetic because it allows maximum metal on metal wear at the friction surfaces. However, as far as I know, the Corvette comes from the factory with a gut full of Mobil 1, as do Vipers, Mercedes Benzes, and Cadillacs.

As far as break-in technique, there are probably as many opinions as there are people who have posted in this thread. I've never heard that heat cycling was required for a modern car engine and that initial break-in should consist of varying load/rpm for the first 500-1,000 miles. I can't speak for motorcycles, but they've got different requirements, I'm sure.

If the break-in has to take place on the highway (as it did with my Z06), then varying gears puts different loads on the engine. I varied 4th, 5th, and 6th for the first 500-1,000 miles when on the highway, with some town driving during and after stops, and of course the car cooling completely over night. At ~4,000 miles, my car put down 355.8 RWHP (~419 at the flywheel), which is about or a little above average for an '02-'04 Z06, so there were no problems. I wasn't able to change my oil until after the trip home (~3,200 miles) and a magnet run through the oil picked up nothing.

I think a lot of opinions are based on "the old days". I don't think that modern engines require nearly as much babying, and if modern car engine blocks require heat cycling to stress relieve the casting (per your last link), it's news to me.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #516  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by the ancient words
my guess is 320 at the wheels at 6 psi
I think everyone guessing low 300s is right on the money.

A healthy 13B-REW makes ~220 RWHP stock @ 10 psi. With a full open exhaust and intake, the same car @ 10 psi would probably be in the ~280-285 RWHP range. At only 6 psi, you're probably right back to 220 RWHP, if you could get the wastegate to open at 6 psi and not 7 psi.

If Stephen's math theories held true and a 20B made 50% more power than a 13B because it has 50% more displacement, then 220 RWHP * 1.5 = 330 RWHP. Since the extra rotor can't possibly be 100% efficient at producing power, my vote is for 300-320 RWHP.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #517  
the ancient words's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: closer
and a magnet run through the oil picked up nothing

why would it? the engine internals are almost all aluminum in the LS6
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #518  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by the ancient words
why would it? the engine internals are almost all aluminum in the LS6
Right... like the um, rings, and the um, cylinder sleeves, and the um, bearings, and the um, rod and crankshaft journals...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 11:58 PM
  #519  
Swolbynos's Avatar
Newb
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: Yukon, OK
Originally Posted by the ancient words
and a magnet run through the oil picked up nothing

why would it? the engine internals are almost all aluminum in the LS6

bearings arent aluminum neither is the crank shaft
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 12:12 AM
  #520  
the ancient words's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: closer
oops, forgot about the steel cylinder sleeves I'm used to bike engines where the cylinder sleeves are typically ceramic-composite

how long did you let the oil sit before running a magnet through it? the tiny particles take a long time to settle out

Last edited by the ancient words; Dec 3, 2004 at 12:15 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 12:22 AM
  #521  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by the ancient words
oops, forgot about the steel cylinder sleeves
And all the other friction surfaces in the engine with the exception of the valve guides...

how long did you let the oil sit before running a magnet through it? the tiny particles take a long time to settle out
What does settling out have to do with running a magnet through the oil? A magnet won't pick up metal shavings if they haven't settled out first?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 12:24 AM
  #522  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by jimlab
I've always heard that initial break-in should be done with natural oil vs. synthetic because it allows maximum metal on metal wear at the friction surfaces. However, as far as I know, the Corvette comes from the factory with a gut full of Mobil 1, as do Vipers, Mercedes Benzes, and Cadillacs.
Jim, I can't speak for the other cars on this list, but I thought Mercedes come "pre-broken in" or so they say?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 12:34 AM
  #523  
the ancient words's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: closer
according to this link http://www.miata-power.com/engine-break-in.htm

Several factors make the older information on break-in obsolete.

The biggest factor is that engine manufacturers now use a much finer honing pattern in the cylinders than they once did. This in turn changes the break-in requirements, because as you're about to learn, the window of opportunity for achieving an exceptional ring seal is much smaller with
newer engines than it was with the older "rough honed" engines.

In addition, there is a lot less heat build up in the cylinders from ring friction due to the finer honing pattern used in modern engines.

The other factors that have changed are the vastly improved metal casting and machining technologies which are now used. This means that the "wearing in" of the new parts involves significantly less friction and actual wear than it did in the distant past.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 12:37 AM
  #524  
the ancient words's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: closer
Originally Posted by jimlab
What does settling out have to do with running a magnet through the oil? A magnet won't pick up metal shavings if they haven't settled out first?
ha, yeah I know but the "magnet test" doesn't seem to work too well with freshly dumped oil....I've tried it...in a modern engine I think we are talking about micron size particles
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 12:51 AM
  #525  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by the ancient words
ha, yeah I know but the "magnet test" doesn't seem to work too well with freshly dumped oil....I've tried it...in a modern engine I think we are talking about micron size particles
Nothing that would evade a magnet from the back of an old 15" subwoofer...
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.