Banzai Racing 20B GT42RS 93 FD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2010 | 11:42 AM
  #126  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by ROTARYFDTT
You can do this [run a 911tt] with stock turbos, the above mentioned wouldn't even be in the same zip code against the Banzai Racing FD.
The current 911tt is somewhere north of 420 hp and nothing to casually dismiss, they can produce 800+ rwhp easily. Don't try that with your crackerbox FD turbos and flimsy chassis/transmission, the car would snap in half.

Last edited by no_more_rice; May 27, 2010 at 12:01 PM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #127  
shmacklepap's Avatar
FD** Fire Disaster
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 3
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by calculon
FWIW, the smallest I've "seen" is a GT40R.

http://www.7parts.com/erikstrelnieks.html
Beth and Erik Strelniek's FD is just insane. First FD I ever rode in, and one of the fastest cars I've ever been in to this day. That car got me hooked on RX7s
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #128  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
With the increased flow of a 20B, I can't believe a 35R would be efficient....

Gt35r would work with a 20b very nicely and still flows enough air to create positive manifold pressure. Remember they move enough air flow for 450+ rear wheel rotary hp. Just because it's bolted up to a larger displacement engine doesn't mean it wont be efficient. It's true this combination wouldn't be efficient in the upper range but the low to mid rpm range would be something fierce. You would get super fast lag free spool and a ton of bottom end torque. All this means is you get one hellacious low to mid range power band. Erik Strelniek's FD is a perfect example of something that's purposely built for low end (hince the 9.7 compression rotors and smallish .94 exhaust housing A/R). This Banzai 20b Fd on the other is engineered for top end.
Reply
Old May 29, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #129  
mefarri's Avatar
Get some
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 680
Likes: 1
From: Arkansas
Agreed with the above. And what's this about flimsey chassis?
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #130  
james81's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Durban, South Africa
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
The current 911tt is somewhere north of 420 hp and nothing to casually dismiss, they can produce 800+ rwhp easily. Don't try that with your crackerbox FD turbos and flimsy chassis/transmission, the car would snap in half.
Flimsy Chassis? Lol fool.
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 11:21 AM
  #131  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
FD chassis rigidity is nowhere near a current 911. Fact. The only fool is one who questions absolute facts.
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #132  
smog-guy707's Avatar
Wangan Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
^
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 12:19 PM
  #133  
mefarri's Avatar
Get some
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 680
Likes: 1
From: Arkansas
You're prob. right but at the same time, it's not going to "snap in half."
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #134  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Ok that was hyperbole, but you get the point. Above 500-600 hp and **** starts to break on these cars right and left (trans, axles, pp frame, etc). It was never designed to handle those power levels!

But the 996/7 turbo is designed to handle it.
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 12:52 PM
  #135  
proz07's Avatar
looking for 82-83 corolla
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: ar
out of curiosity what would the cost of a intercooler/radiator setup like this be from you guys?

z
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #136  
Dysfnctnl85's Avatar
Acquiring money pits
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Ok that was hyperbole, but you get the point. Above 500-600 hp and **** starts to break on these cars right and left (trans, axles, pp frame, etc). It was never designed to handle those power levels!

But the 996/7 turbo is designed to handle it.
Gah, if the Internet is true (heh), the RX-8 has TWICE the torsional rigidity of the FD (30,000 N-m/deg. vs 15,000 N-m, deg.). That's insane.

But there are remedies, no? Roll cage, strut bars, engine mounts, transmission mounts, differential mounts, etc.? I doubt it's enough to achieve the RX-8's rigidity though.

I'd imagine the 997-series Turbo cars are somewhere in the vicinity of the RX-8 judging by the 997 Carrera nearing 33,000. Intuition leads me to believe the GT3-RS is probably the highest of the production (non race-spec -- ala GT3-RSR) cars.

Then again, not one of these numbers contains a source or reference...

P.S. The car is gorgeous. I really had my doubts about the red after seeing the engine bay, but when the entire car is in the frame it looks fantastic.
Reply
Old May 30, 2010 | 09:58 PM
  #137  
dagoof's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Likes: 6
From: Idaho
How much did this cost?
Reply
Old May 31, 2010 | 08:40 AM
  #138  
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Specialists
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 344
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by proz07
out of curiosity what would the cost of a intercooler/radiator setup like this be from you guys?

z
It is not a setup that we sell, it is custom specifically for this car.


Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Ok that was hyperbole, but you get the point. Above 500-600 hp and **** starts to break on these cars right and left (trans, axles, pp frame, etc). It was never designed to handle those power levels!
What is your malfunction? There has not been a thread yet that I have seen you participate in that you have not argued with someone. Always about something you know virtually nothing about and want to portrait yourself as an expert. Shall we revisit the OMP thread?

My car makes over 500whp and NOTHING (I repeat nothing) has broken. Never mind right and left....not to mention that not one of the parts you just listed is even part of the "flimsy chassis", they are all drivetrain components

Go crap in someone elses thread.
Reply
Old May 31, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #139  
Warpaint_88's Avatar
Darkside Performance
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, Va
Id like to say that I have ordered a omp block off plate, differential brace from Banzai and they are nothing but top of the line when it comes to quality, price, and customer service. I plan on ordering their motor mounts, oil pan brace, and the rest of their block off plates in the near future. Top of the line rotary shop! Thanks Banzai-Racing.
Reply
Old May 31, 2010 | 11:29 AM
  #140  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Ok that was hyperbole, but you get the point. Above 500-600 hp and **** starts to break on these cars right and left (trans, axles, pp frame, etc). It was never designed to handle those power levels!

But the 996/7 turbo is designed to handle it.
But you should have said drivetrain instead of chassis. All those parts that need to be upgraded are drivetrain related. The chassis is more than strong enough to hold 600+rwhp. That's why you got the responses you did. I think for a 20yr old design (yes 20yrs because it was designed back in 1990), the Fd chasses is still one of the stronger chassis out there.


Edit: Oops just saw Banzai's post!
Reply
Old May 31, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #141  
XLR8's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 10
From: NJ
^ Agreed with the 20 year old design.... Given the factor of technology & manufacturing improvements, there better be more capable cars than the FD.... It's simple progress.

However, the FD is still highly competitive in performance, & unmatched in looks by today's standards.

Comparing apples to oranges really....
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 12:01 AM
  #142  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by t-von
But you should have said drivetrain instead of chassis.
Both are relatively weak in terms of managing 500+ hp. Not sure what climbed up banzai's ***, but I know exactly what I'm talking about: trans, axle, and powerplant frame failures with these cars are extremely well documented at high hp levels. Drive it like a ***** and you might get lucky for awhile.

I think for a 20yr old design (yes 20yrs because it was designed back in 1990), the Fd chasses is still one of the stronger chassis out there.
I agree, but compared to something like a 997 turbo, forget it.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 02:28 AM
  #143  
Turbo II FC's Avatar
Total Balance is Key
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 6
From: Texas
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
I agree, but compared to something like a 997 turbo, forget it.
Then dont compare them unless you'd like to start comparing prices as well.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 02:40 AM
  #144  
widebodyseven's Avatar
Formerly widebodyseven
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 0
From: Garage
Originally Posted by Banzai-Racing
What is your malfunction? There has not been a thread yet that I have seen you participate in that you have not argued with someone.
So true

But reading the conv. is so fun.LoL
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #145  
james81's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Durban, South Africa
once again; lol fool. Chassis = frame rails, subframes, suspension mounts, body, etc. Not transmission and axles. Go fap or say something useful to contribute to the thread in a positive way, and if you love the 997s so much go moan on their forum.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 10:23 AM
  #146  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
I'm well aware of the definition of chassis and drivetrain components and don't need some pile-on dipshit with a sixth grade education spelling anything out for me. Get the heck outta here, son. My point was not to bash the FD or this conversion but to point out the limitations of this car at higher hp levels. The chassis has relatvely low rigidity compared to other 500 hp cars: fact. The drivetrain components are not designed to handle more than about 400 hp. Fact.

Last edited by no_more_rice; Jun 1, 2010 at 10:25 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #147  
moosejaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 8
From: Miami
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
My point was not to bash the FD or this conversion
but you've already done so
please a call for behaving in a civilized manner
afterall we're not M3 owners
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #148  
armytim2002's Avatar
Preheated Badger
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Sierra Vista, AZ
*******. Fact.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 09:57 AM
  #149  
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Specialists
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 344
From: Indiana
Got the car back on the dyno to clean up some of the upper RPM richness and dial in the gain on the boost controller a bit more. It made 529rwhp at 12psi boost, the dyno picks it up as a max of 13.7 psi with a bleed down to 11.7psi. The Defi gauge reads a solid 12psi, probably just the difference in source locations. We still have some clean up to do above 7500 to take care of the little dip and make the power more linear. Should see 540-550 @ 12psi next tuning session.

Decided to upgrade a few things before then. We have been doing all this tuning on stock 9 plugs and thought it was time to see how the NGK 10.5 race plugs R6725-105 effected things. These are a little expensive but I prefer them as they are the same length as the stock plugs and do not require a shaved socket to install. http://banzai-racing.com/store/93+_r...ark_plugs.html

Also decided to upgrade the Mazdaspeed LSD to the Carbonetics Carbon 1.5 LSD. While I have that out I thought it would be a good idea to install the Driveshaft shop 3" aluminum driveshaft and Chromoly Axles in brand new halfshafts. I believe in upgrading parts before they give out.
http://banzai-racing.com/store/93+_r...ferential.html
http://banzai-racing.com/store/93+_r...haft_axle.html

Next I will be dialing it in to 15psi, then water/meth and 20psi

New dyno sheet:

Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 06:11 PM
  #150  
GoRacer's Avatar
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 PM.