2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

PD Swap MIST SEE...PICS! ( have some questions too)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-02, 02:02 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rxhevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PD Swap MUST SEE...PICS! ( have some questions too)

Ok, I am in the process of doing the PD and lower fuel rail removal. I have done each step while taking pictures and will post a detailed description of the process. My FC could have cought fire any day now, as the famous screw in the PD was completely backed out. Below are a series of pictures of the swap, and instructions will follow. I do have a few questions for the "experts" While I have the whole TB,Dynamic Chamer, and both fuel rails off, is there anything that I should do before I put it all back together. So far I plan to clean everything, install 550cc injectors in the secondaries, replace the lower fuel rail (of course) and maybe new vacuum lines. Should I reuse the clips that go on the fuel lines or should I get new hose clamps. Mazda used those clips that you squeeze to remove. Anyone have a preference? Well, here are the pictures, and once VERY good one of a side-by-side S4 and S5 fuel rail.
-DL











Last edited by rxhevin; 04-23-02 at 02:22 PM.
Old 04-23-02, 02:20 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rxhevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fixed broken pic links..sorry
Old 04-23-02, 02:48 PM
  #3  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Nice pics.
Anyone know how necessary the plastic air bleeds are? Is it at all beneficial to remove them, or at all detrimental?
Sean Cathcart
Old 04-23-02, 03:07 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rxhevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Sean, not sure about the air bleeds. I am considering blocking off the EGR, but I wonder if I will ever pass emissions with out the EGR (assuming I put the air pump and ACV back on). Anyone know if the EGR is absolutely necessary to pass emissions?
-DL
Old 04-23-02, 03:18 PM
  #5  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
You should be fine to ditch it.
After all, none of the S5 cars had one, and they all passed.
Sean Cathcart
Old 04-23-02, 04:51 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rxhevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok, anyone have advice on the hose clamps vs. clips? Also anything else I should do while im "in there"?
Old 04-23-02, 05:09 PM
  #7  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: PD Swap MUST SEE...PICS! ( have some questions too)

Originally posted by rxhevin
Ok, I am in the process of doing the PD and lower fuel rail removal. I have done each step while taking pictures and will post a detailed description of the process
Good work, I’m sure lots of people will appreciate your efforts!
So far I plan to... install 550cc injectors in the secondaries...
It’s been said before, but there’s really no need to do this. The stock 460cc/min injectors flow enough fuel at 80% duty for ~250fwhp. That’s bridgeport territory! You’d also need a fuel controller with these injectors or it’ll run like a bucket of ****.
Should I reuse the clips that go on the fuel lines or should I get new hose clamps. Mazda used those clips that you squeeze to remove. Anyone have a preference
Throw those POS clips away and get decent screw clamps. Much better.
Old 04-23-02, 07:33 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rxhevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZConvertible, Thanks for the advice. Well one of the reasons that I want to throw the 550's in the secondaries is because they were recently remanufactured by RC Engineering. The ones I removed looked kinda crappy. Will it really run poorly without a fuel controller or will it just not reach their full potential?
Old 04-23-02, 08:04 PM
  #9  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by rxhevin
Will it really run poorly without a fuel controller...?
You betcha. At full flight, you'll be pumping in about 10% more fuel than the computer thinks the engine needs. Running that rich will simply kill your top-end power. It'll cost a lot less to get your old injectors reconditioned than buy a fuel controller. Having said that, if you plan to get serious with your NA, a fuel controller will help a lot, but you still won't need 550's unless you go beyond a street port.
Old 04-23-02, 08:48 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rxhevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZConvertible,

quote from HAILERS "I put 550's in my 87n/a secondaries, and I have no doubts that it runs a darn site faster, on top end especially. That said, John Gibson wrote and said I needed to get some type of fuel controller for them to be effective. Got me. He's been around and doing rx longer than I. I still, seat of the pants know its faster. Just have Mazdatrix dual from front to rear and a K and N. The K and N don't do much for me. Probably just me. Not sensitive enough. If you go out to my car tonite while I'm sleeping and put the 460's in the car, I guarantee that I'll know it when I drive to work tomorrow. There! My story and I'm sticking with it."

Go to post: CLICK HERE
Old 04-23-02, 09:09 PM
  #11  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: NZConvertible,

Originally posted by rxhevin
quote from HAILERS "I put 550's in my 87n/a secondaries, and I have no doubts that it runs a darn site faster, on top end especially."
Well I can’t explain that. All I know is that under load (when the ECU is in open-loop) the ECU has no idea how much fuel is being injected. It just looks at airflow, air temp, water temp, etc and calculates a pulsewith (the length of time the injector is to be open) by looking up preset tables. It’s only logical that a bigger injector will flow more fuel than a smaller one if they’re open for the same length of time and have the same rail pressure. So if more fuel is going in than the computer has calculated is necessary for an appropriate mixture, it should be running rich. Too rich equals slower, not faster! Perhaps Hailers can shed more light, but I’ve heard a lot more people say it doesn’t work than that say it does.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
bb6guy
Old School and Other Rotary
10
10-01-18 08:07 AM
OrangeMax
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
09-04-15 10:42 AM
RotaryBobby
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
08-29-15 10:32 AM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
08-15-15 01:38 PM



Quick Reply: PD Swap MIST SEE...PICS! ( have some questions too)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.