90 Turbo II - 240RWHP / 240TQ
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: brantford, ON Canada
Originally Posted by brad_88fc-na-gxl
Different track, different grip, different elevation, different temperature, stock cat-back and 10psi for me. There are many unknowns here.
New E46 BMW M3's (333hp) were running 14.2's .
New E46 BMW M3's (333hp) were running 14.2's .
very true, i didnt take into acount about the track and conditions. like i said before i wasnt trying to insult you or anything....now that i think of it thats pretty good for a stock exhaust.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: brantford, ON Canada
Originally Posted by RETed
That's about right.
Ignore the comments from the peanut gallery.
I ran a 13.447 @ 105.00 putting down 253.9hp at the wheels on a DynoJet.
60' time was a paltry 2.143 - bad camber in rear I found out later.
You 60' time can be improved to about 2.0 flat - this would knock off another 0.2 seconds off the 1/4 time.
I dunno if you have larger fuel injectors, but you're close to maxing out a stock set of 4x550's.
-Ted
Ignore the comments from the peanut gallery.
I ran a 13.447 @ 105.00 putting down 253.9hp at the wheels on a DynoJet.
60' time was a paltry 2.143 - bad camber in rear I found out later.
You 60' time can be improved to about 2.0 flat - this would knock off another 0.2 seconds off the 1/4 time.
I dunno if you have larger fuel injectors, but you're close to maxing out a stock set of 4x550's.
-Ted
peanut gallery??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
