90 Turbo II - 240RWHP / 240TQ
07-27-04, 12:07 AM
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
90 Turbo II - 240RWHP / 240TQ
Mods are :
3" Downpipe
3" Midpipe
2.5" K&N Cone Intake
TurboXS Manual Boost Controller set at 11psi
Microtech LT-8
Removed Airpump
Walbro 255lph
1000cc secondary injectors
Stock Turbo, Stock catback, Stock ports, Stock intercooler, Air Conditioning/Powersteering/Cruise all intact .
Put down 240 RWHP and 240 TQ at 11 psi. I only put down another couple HP at 13 psi so I dialed it back. We shall see how it goes at the track on August 6th.
I was running 14.8 last year with just an HKS intake (187RWHP / 175 TQ). I am hoping for high 13's .... wish me luck, I'll need it .
3" Downpipe
3" Midpipe
2.5" K&N Cone Intake
TurboXS Manual Boost Controller set at 11psi
Microtech LT-8
Removed Airpump
Walbro 255lph
1000cc secondary injectors
Stock Turbo, Stock catback, Stock ports, Stock intercooler, Air Conditioning/Powersteering/Cruise all intact .
Put down 240 RWHP and 240 TQ at 11 psi. I only put down another couple HP at 13 psi so I dialed it back. We shall see how it goes at the track on August 6th.
I was running 14.8 last year with just an HKS intake (187RWHP / 175 TQ). I am hoping for high 13's .... wish me luck, I'll need it .
07-27-04, 07:05 AM
#2
can you post the dyno graph?
you'll definitely run atleast high 13's. make sure you post your 1/8th mile time to, it should be on your 1/4 mile timeslip. (i wanna compare cause all we have around here in 1/8th mile)
on my jspec @ 13lbs and pumpgas wth the safc maxed out i ran an 8.48@84mph in the 1/8th mile, which SHOULD be high 12's in the 1/4.
you'll definitely run atleast high 13's. make sure you post your 1/8th mile time to, it should be on your 1/4 mile timeslip. (i wanna compare cause all we have around here in 1/8th mile)
on my jspec @ 13lbs and pumpgas wth the safc maxed out i ran an 8.48@84mph in the 1/8th mile, which SHOULD be high 12's in the 1/4.
Last edited by jacobcartmill; 07-27-04 at 07:08 AM.
07-27-04, 09:55 AM
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll have to scan it....
My 1/8 mile on my 14.8 run was 9.5@76.4 MPH last year. Would it really be that hard to get down to a 8.48 1/8 mile like you. It's only a 1.02 second difference. We should be similar I think.
12's though ??? I would go nuts if I ran 12's ............
My 1/8 mile on my 14.8 run was 9.5@76.4 MPH last year. Would it really be that hard to get down to a 8.48 1/8 mile like you. It's only a 1.02 second difference. We should be similar I think.
12's though ??? I would go nuts if I ran 12's ............
Trending Topics
07-30-04, 12:21 AM
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
No, that's not enough power for 12's unless you're going to use slicks.
-Ted
-Ted
Last edited by brad_88fc-na-gxl; 07-30-04 at 12:27 AM.
07-30-04, 12:23 AM
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wankel7
How the heck do you control boost creep?
There is no boost creep ............ I have to use a boost controller just to make 11 psi ......... otherwise it was making 7 leaking to 5 .
08-01-04, 03:32 AM
#10
B.G.O.B.G.A.I.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brad_88fc-na-gxl
I'll have to scan it....
My 1/8 mile on my 14.8 run was 9.5@76.4 MPH last year. Would it really be that hard to get down to a 8.48 1/8 mile like you. It's only a 1.02 second difference. We should be similar I think.
12's though ??? I would go nuts if I ran 12's ............
My 1/8 mile on my 14.8 run was 9.5@76.4 MPH last year. Would it really be that hard to get down to a 8.48 1/8 mile like you. It's only a 1.02 second difference. We should be similar I think.
12's though ??? I would go nuts if I ran 12's ............
08-01-04, 03:42 AM
#11
B.G.O.B.G.A.I.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Travelintrevor
your 9.5 sec 1/8th suggests a bad RT time or lots of wheel slip or just not enough experience...with a 8.6 you can still run a 13.6..I have...you just need more power up top...higher rpms....and that is what you mods gave you.....your first 5 runs or so should be just to dial in your RT and your 1/8...get that to a 8 or even a 8.6 and you should be in the mid to LOW 13's...the 13.6 run was with a grandpappy .960 RT time....so at my usual .5ish or .6ish RT I could have ran a 13.2 or so...
well..maybe it does not..I did not realize that you had no mods then..sorry...you can easily run mid 13's....to get to HIGH 12's you will need 15 inch slicks, a .510 RT time and a 8 sec 1/8 th..throw out EVERYTHING that you can...1/4 tank gas...bout a 4k-5k drop at the start-with slicks baby..good luck
08-01-04, 06:58 PM
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Travelintrevor
well..maybe it does not..I did not realize that you had no mods then..sorry...you can easily run mid 13's....to get to HIGH 12's you will need 15 inch slicks, a .510 RT time and a 8 sec 1/8 th..throw out EVERYTHING that you can...1/4 tank gas...bout a 4k-5k drop at the start-with slicks baby..good luck
Yeah, I was basically stock when I ran my 14.8 1/4 mile . I suppose we will find out this Friday how things go.
08-14-04, 12:54 PM
#19
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just ran last night .
Best was 13.5 @ 103 MPH . 2.1 60ft. and an 8.7 @ 82MPH 1/8 mile.
All my other runs of the night consisted of massive wheel hop/spinning which had my 60ft times between 2.3 and 2.6. That was giving my 14.1 second passes.
Other people I raced:
NEW GTI 15.6 @ 93MPH
05 LANCER RALLIART 15.9 @ 86MPH
RSX-S 15.3 @ 94MPH
SUPERCHARGED CIVIC 14.9 @ 95 MPH
5th GEN PRELUDE 15.6 @ 86 MPH (not last night)
TURBO CIVIC 15.1 @ 93 MPH (not last night)
13B STREETPORT RX7 15.4 @ 88 MPH (not last night)
Best was 13.5 @ 103 MPH . 2.1 60ft. and an 8.7 @ 82MPH 1/8 mile.
All my other runs of the night consisted of massive wheel hop/spinning which had my 60ft times between 2.3 and 2.6. That was giving my 14.1 second passes.
Other people I raced:
NEW GTI 15.6 @ 93MPH
05 LANCER RALLIART 15.9 @ 86MPH
RSX-S 15.3 @ 94MPH
SUPERCHARGED CIVIC 14.9 @ 95 MPH
5th GEN PRELUDE 15.6 @ 86 MPH (not last night)
TURBO CIVIC 15.1 @ 93 MPH (not last night)
13B STREETPORT RX7 15.4 @ 88 MPH (not last night)
08-19-04, 12:18 AM
#23
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by brad_88fc-na-gxl
Best was 13.5 @ 103 MPH . 2.1 60ft. and an 8.7 @ 82MPH 1/8 mile.
Ignore the comments from the peanut gallery.
I ran a 13.447 @ 105.00 putting down 253.9hp at the wheels on a DynoJet.
60' time was a paltry 2.143 - bad camber in rear I found out later.
You 60' time can be improved to about 2.0 flat - this would knock off another 0.2 seconds off the 1/4 time.
I dunno if you have larger fuel injectors, but you're close to maxing out a stock set of 4x550's.
-Ted
08-19-04, 01:40 AM
#24
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
That's about right.
Ignore the comments from the peanut gallery.
I ran a 13.447 @ 105.00 putting down 253.9hp at the wheels on a DynoJet.
60' time was a paltry 2.143 - bad camber in rear I found out later.
You 60' time can be improved to about 2.0 flat - this would knock off another 0.2 seconds off the 1/4 time.
I dunno if you have larger fuel injectors, but you're close to maxing out a stock set of 4x550's.
-Ted
Ignore the comments from the peanut gallery.
I ran a 13.447 @ 105.00 putting down 253.9hp at the wheels on a DynoJet.
60' time was a paltry 2.143 - bad camber in rear I found out later.
You 60' time can be improved to about 2.0 flat - this would knock off another 0.2 seconds off the 1/4 time.
I dunno if you have larger fuel injectors, but you're close to maxing out a stock set of 4x550's.
-Ted
I have some 1000cc secondaries in there. No worries in the fuel department yet. The temperature outside was about 25 - 30 C that night . Pretty damn hot. Just with colder weather and a 2.0 60 ft. I am expecting 13.3 at best.
Thanks for your input. Glad to see that I'm running somewhat normal times. I dynoed 238.8 rwhp also on a dynojet so it looks like im running what I should compared to you.
Last edited by brad_88fc-na-gxl; 08-19-04 at 01:47 AM.
08-19-04, 01:45 AM
#25
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 86gxlsp
i ran a 13.38@102.65 mph........
and my mods are alot more basic then yours.....your car should be in the 12's.
and my mods are alot more basic then yours.....your car should be in the 12's.
Different track, different grip, different elevation, different temperature, stock cat-back and 10psi for me. There are many unknowns here.
New E46 BMW M3's (333hp) were running 14.2's .