Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

water cooling vs. oil cooling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 10:34 AM
  #1  
hondah8er's Avatar
Thread Starter
mazdaspeed 3 coming soon
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Ontario
water cooling vs. oil cooling

Can someone explain the diffs between an oil cooled turbo and a water cooled one? Pro's Con's price diff? thanks

I've heard oil cooled turbo's are not as reliable
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 05:43 PM
  #2  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
All turbos technically are "oil cooled" in that some of the heat is carried away by the oil. Non water cooled turbos just rely *entirely* on the oil.

Here's a graphic from an SAE paper that Dodge did on the engineering process of the 2.2 Turbo, back in the 80's. They were trying to determine if the benefits of a watercooled housing outweighed the cost. The cars had watercooled housings, as well as practically all turbo cars made OEM since about that timeframe.



I see absolutely no reason why anyone would want to run a non-watercooled turbo. Unless maybe it was a rally car running huge amounts of antilag and you need the ability to quickly change the turbo every handful of stages.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Feb 26, 2021 10:12 PM
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
Dec 8, 2015 01:45 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Aug 31, 2015 07:49 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 17, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.