Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Synchronic no diaphram design...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-07, 09:15 PM
  #1  
Newbie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Synchronic no diaphram design...

synchronic BOV:
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/6...3f0150f005.htm

synchronic wastegate:
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/e...8600ccfc68.htm

Thoughts, opinions, facts, just looking for some intelligent discussion on these parts as the only other places I see info being posted it's just bickering back and forth about tial being better, then someone saying these are better, blah blah blah.

discuss...
Old 01-22-07, 11:25 PM
  #2  
Goodfalla Engine Complete

iTrader: (28)
 
Monkman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,238
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Hmmm. Looks interesting. the only points I really like are the lessening of metal on metal parts, and the elimination of a diaphragm. seems to visibly react faster too. but wouldn't that also be a bad thing? couldn't some delay actually be better for blow-off in between shifts, so it is venting just enough pressure to prevent surge or overboosting, but allow for quick spool in the next gear?
Old 01-23-07, 12:18 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
RXBeetle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mich. USA
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The main difference is that it uses a cylinder instead of a diaphragm. The BOV should be able to react as fast as the throttle can close, if it doesn't then back pressure is built up stalling the turbo. If a shift takes .5 sec and the turbo flows "X" cfm of air in that time a faster actuation should be a more efficient at expelling that air. From the video it looks like it does this quite well.
The wastegate seems like its an even better application for the system. More adjustability and less heat in the actuation mechanism. That being said the amount of physical contact that the seals have to make worries me. It seems like that would cause alot of drag and slow the actuation. I guess simple testing would show what the results are. I also worry what happens when the seals start to wear out. The cylinder body determines valve seating. The wearing of the seal could also cause it to bind. What do they lube it with? How does it hold up to the heat? It's a pneumatic cylinder, cylinders do fail, even when they aren't attached to exhaust systems. Someone needs to run em for a good long time on a rotary engine, I think that would be a just about the harshest thorough testing you could do.
Old 01-23-07, 10:06 AM
  #4  
Newbie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, the one solid thing they were discussing is that the BOV test isn't really fair, the synchronic one is hooked up to a vacuum and pressure source where the HKS one is only hooked up to a vacuum source, they seemed to be leaning towards that giving the synchronic an advantage and that if the HKS was being tested similarly it would react quicker.

good points on the wastegate.
Old 01-25-07, 03:10 PM
  #5  
Newbie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn, I was hoping for some good discussion on this . Or at least someone to pop in, say that it's hogwash (and why of course) and have that be the end of it .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
10
09-02-15 10:18 AM
BlaCkPlaGUE
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
12-04-04 12:16 AM
vaughnc
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
05-26-04 08:36 PM
SuperPhly
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
05-03-02 07:41 AM
HAILERS
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
03-26-02 10:51 AM



Quick Reply: Synchronic no diaphram design...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.