Racing Kills Lounge The RX-7 Club and IB in no way supports or endorses illegal street racing in any way, shape or form, and highly recommends against any illegal activities.

My 03 Cobra vs Goodfellafd3s 93 Rx-7 (Video)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-06, 05:53 PM
  #1  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
My 03 Cobra vs Goodfellafd3s 93 Rx-7 (Video)

So this has got to be the 3rd time we've lined up and the result is always the same. After some people talking smack in the other cobra vs fd thread earlier this week, I laid down the challenge. We did like 5-6 highways pulls from a 2nd gear roll. The first run I immediatley got a car+ on him and he started to fall back really fast. I think he got mad and let off. I let him catch up and we lined up again. Same thing. I immediately get a car and continue to pull away as we wound out the gears. I usually don't bother to look at the speedo during racing but I think we got to about 130 or so. We get off to make a u-turn. Rich pulls along side. Rich is pissed. Rich turns up boost. <a href='http://media.putfile.com/rich-mad-2'>Click here to watch 'rich-mad-2'</a>
Old 08-08-06, 05:56 PM
  #2  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Sorry for the horrible quality of the video. I took it on my camera phone with one hand while driving with the other. I had to drop the phone in order to shift hence I was shifting very slow. I think he was running aobut 16 psi that race.

Last edited by IRPerformance; 08-08-06 at 06:09 PM.
Old 08-08-06, 05:57 PM
  #3  
silver ghost

iTrader: (11)
 
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home of the Rolex 24
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Good kill...How much boost were running Rich?
Old 08-08-06, 06:10 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
coolvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not enough
Old 08-08-06, 06:10 PM
  #5  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
He said he was runnining 12-13 the first time, then like 15-16 the 2nd run thats on video.
Old 08-08-06, 07:49 PM
  #6  
HAHA V8

iTrader: (9)
 
PDViper77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach - FL
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What you said after the race was funny as hell!
Old 08-08-06, 07:52 PM
  #7  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
i am shocked by the outcome!!! is your 12.2 @118mph indicative of your current setup?

if it is then i am sure u can understand why people talked "smack" in the last thread as thats stock twins numbers. but i am guessing that your sig is not up to date given that u just pulled a car that could be trapping around 125mph.

either way thks for the vid....

Last edited by matty; 08-08-06 at 07:56 PM.
Old 08-08-06, 08:48 PM
  #8  
No Paypal Accepted!

 
Buzzardsluck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: san antonio, Texas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Theres a lot of things I could say in this thread but Ill just leave it at nice kill
Old 08-08-06, 08:53 PM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can't see the video
Old 08-08-06, 08:56 PM
  #10  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Must be the 80's apple 2 computers you guys are using in the shop. Try this http://media.putfile.com/rich-mad-2 Its a quicktime file.
Old 08-08-06, 08:59 PM
  #11  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Matty, the 12.2 was my first time at the strip with the car pullied. Was also my first time trying out the mickey thompsons. I had something like 25 psi in them. I later learned that I should lower the tire pressure to about 16. I spun through the first 3 gears. I am confident that the car can easily get well into the 11s. Hmm whats different... Brembo brakes which must weigh more than stock, dynamat in the trunk, dual beam hids with 4 ballasts, about 20 lbs more muscle on me. Oh I'm experimenting with more timing now too
Attached Thumbnails My 03 Cobra vs Goodfellafd3s 93 Rx-7 (Video)-photo_080606_009.jpg   My 03 Cobra vs Goodfellafd3s 93 Rx-7 (Video)-photo_073106_005.jpg  

Last edited by IRPerformance; 08-08-06 at 09:12 PM.
Old 08-08-06, 09:16 PM
  #12  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
Matty, the 12.2 was my first time at the strip with the car pullied. Was also my first time trying out the mickey thompsons. I had something like 25 psi in them. I later learned that I should lower the tire pressure to about 16. I spun through the first 3 gears. I am confident that the car can easily get well into the 11s. Hmm whats different... Brembo brakes which muist weigh more than stock, dynamat in the trunk, dual beam hids with 4 ballasts, about 20 lbs more muscle on me. Oh I'm experimenting with more timing now too
yeah u def have a 11 second car.
but i am not really talking about the 12.2 more so the trap speed. 118mph should be on par with a stock twin car. hmmm how do i say this...something aint adding up here. u sure rich gave it more boost?

Last edited by matty; 08-08-06 at 09:19 PM.
Old 08-08-06, 09:35 PM
  #13  
Ahh du ma! El Es Juan!

 
audiobot7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice kill!
Old 08-08-06, 10:24 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
21K95RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Balt. MD
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea i can't see the video either, guess my quicktime isn't up to date. are you able to upload on streetfire?
Old 08-08-06, 11:54 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
rt turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 21K95RX7
yea i can't see the video either, guess my quicktime isn't up to date. are you able to upload on streetfire?
ditto
Old 08-09-06, 01:48 AM
  #16  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Improved FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
again, this goes back to basic physics and rolling resistance...knowledge is power, ignorance is deadly

there is no way Rich, running about 385-390 hp at 16 psi (guessing) is going to keep up with a 490 hp car from a high speed roll...again (and I keep repeating this), horsepower and aerodynamics dominate the equation as you approach triple digits, weight is much less of a factor, and there is no way the aerodynamic advantage of an FD is going to make up for a 100 hp deficit...this is a no-brainer, I could have predicted the outcome before you even turned the key

now, race from a stop and see what happens! that should be a good race, because the light weight of the FD will pay major dividends, provided Rich knows how to launch his car, and I believe he does, based on his experience at the strip

not a very fair race at all, gloating that you beat someone in a highway roll when you are up 100+ hp is dumb....Mustangs are still incredible pos, they are hideous looking, and common as dog poop....I can make a VW bus go fast, too, but who gives a ****?

run him from a dig...
Old 08-09-06, 01:50 AM
  #17  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
so update it
Old 08-09-06, 01:51 AM
  #18  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Improved FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh and the vid didn't work for me, either (stupid quicktime)
Old 08-09-06, 01:58 AM
  #19  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by Improved FD
again, this goes back to basic physics and rolling resistance...knowledge is power, ignorance is deadly

there is no way Rich, running about 385-390 hp at 16 psi (guessing) is going to keep up with a 490 hp car from a high speed roll...again (and I keep repeating this), horsepower and aerodynamics dominate the equation as you approach triple digits, weight is much less of a factor, and there is no way the aerodynamic advantage of an FD is going to make up for a 100 hp deficit...this is a no-brainer, I could have predicted the outcome before you even turned the key

now, race from a stop and see what happens! that should be a good race, because the light weight of the FD will pay major dividends, provided Rich knows how to launch his car, and I believe he does, based on his experience at the strip

not a very fair race at all, gloating that you beat someone in a highway roll when you are up 100+ hp is dumb....Mustangs are still incredible pos, they are hideous looking, and common as dog poop....I can make a VW bus go fast, too, but who gives a ****?

run him from a dig...
Big words there buddy. Read again. My CBR may hit 100 in 2nd gear but not either of these cars. This isn't a sport bike. Each run we started in 2nd gear which is about 40-50 mph. And guess what, my car runs all day every day. I don't have to re-tune for weather or altitude changes. I don't worry about overheating or getting bad gas. And if I detonate I back off on the timing. That being said, I have been through both cars inside and out and there is no way an rx-7 is better in quality. Both cars are what they are. Affordable fun cars that can be made fast relatively easily. If it makes you feel better we could line up and run. We could go from a dig. I won't even put my drag radials on.

Last edited by IRPerformance; 08-09-06 at 02:01 AM.
Old 08-09-06, 02:03 AM
  #20  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (13)
 
jamespond24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburg, KS.
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Professional RX-7 motor work and parts installations.
Pm me for details
http://www.myspace.com/rotaryexperimentseven

Good way of representing yourself by beating and bashing the 7. Good kill and good luck to you.
Old 08-09-06, 07:08 AM
  #21  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Improved FD
again, this goes back to basic physics and rolling resistance...knowledge is power, ignorance is deadly

there is no way Rich, running about 385-390 hp at 16 psi (guessing) is going to keep up with a 490 hp car from a high speed roll...again (and I keep repeating this), horsepower and aerodynamics dominate the equation as you approach triple digits, weight is much less of a factor, and there is no way the aerodynamic advantage of an FD is going to make up for a 100 hp deficit...this is a no-brainer, I could have predicted the outcome before you even turned the key

now, race from a stop and see what happens! that should be a good race, because the light weight of the FD will pay major dividends, provided Rich knows how to launch his car, and I believe he does, based on his experience at the strip

not a very fair race at all, gloating that you beat someone in a highway roll when you are up 100+ hp is dumb....Mustangs are still incredible pos, they are hideous looking, and common as dog poop....I can make a VW bus go fast, too, but who gives a ****?

run him from a dig...
i couldnt disagree more. they went from a 2nd gear punch. thats hardily a high speed roll my friend and thats when the fd lost the race. he didnt lose it on the top end. did u watch the vid? 100rwhp is easily offset by the 1k lb difference. we arent talking about a 100mph punch are we?

i am still friggen shocked at the outcome of this. looking at trap speed that is posted it should be a no brainer that the fd should have won.

having been around car racing for over a decade it is pretty obvious to me that the true real and best way to compare twos cars performance is via their trap speed. it eliminates driver error/skill.

Last edited by matty; 08-09-06 at 07:22 AM.
Old 08-09-06, 07:13 AM
  #22  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
That being said, I have been through both cars inside and out and there is no way an rx-7 is better in quality
i wasnt gonna add my .02 on the which car is better dynamic to this topic but i mean come on. you have a one trick pony man. the FD is better than most in many differetn areas....not just straight line performance like your muscle car is.
the only car thats on par with the fd thats under 100k is the z06. that i am sure of.

that statement you made is false....u are comparing apples to oranges.
Old 08-09-06, 07:42 AM
  #23  
Senior Member

 
rt turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
i couldnt disagree more. they went from a 2nd gear punch. thats hardily a high speed roll my friend and thats when the fd lost the race. he didnt lose it on the top end. did u watch the vid? 100rwhp is easily offset by the 1k lb difference. we arent talking about a 100mph punch are we?

i am still friggen shocked at the outcome of this. looking at trap speed that is posted it should be a no brainer that the fd should have won.

having been around car racing for over a decade it is pretty obvious to me that the true real and best way to compare twos cars performance is via their trap speed. it eliminates driver error/skill.
well, i was too, but then i thought about it.. ive raced a 459 whp 03 cobra in my evo and it trapped 120 mph ( i still won the race by way of launch). if hes making 49xwhp, hes trapping higher than 120. id say around 123-124.
Old 08-09-06, 07:59 AM
  #24  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by rt turbo
well, i was too, but then i thought about it.. ive raced a 459 whp 03 cobra in my evo and it trapped 120 mph ( i still won the race by way of launch). if hes making 49xwhp, hes trapping higher than 120. id say around 123-124.
yeah i agree....i think heshould be trapping above 120....my guess is 122mph. but i was just going off his posted trap.
Old 08-09-06, 08:50 AM
  #25  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Rich's car looks good...even when losing.


Quick Reply: My 03 Cobra vs Goodfellafd3s 93 Rx-7 (Video)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.