Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

ITS caster, toe, camber...your thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2007 | 11:26 PM
  #1  
bean13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Question ITS caster, toe, camber...your thoughts

So, just want to see what other guys are running. Mine are stock specs with the exception of camber, -3.5* in the front and -1* in the rear....what do you folks perfer.

I am on hoosiers as well, '90 ITS.

Ludwig...any thoughts?
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 06:36 AM
  #2  
C. Ludwig's Avatar
www.lms-efi.com
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 147
From: Floyds Knobs. IN
You'll need to play with the settings and monitor your results with a tire pyrometer. You're in the ballpark. Something around -3 - 3.5 in front, -1 - 2 in the back. All the caster you can get while making them even. I always ran 1/8" total toe out in front and 0 toe in the rear. When I told Mike at ISC how the car was set up as far as alignment and shock/spring package he asked "How do you drive that thing?" Quite well actually, but your results may vary.

Make use of the tire probe. As you begin to use more of the tire you'll probably find that you'll need more camber to maintain even temps. Some tracks require different setups too.
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
ours was closer to zero toe, but other wise about the same....
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 05:02 PM
  #4  
bean13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
max caster huh? Would you reccomend that for "baseline"?
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
actually paulie and i were talking about this the other night, we're thinking we had the car too low, and the geometry would have been better with a higher ride height.

any thoughts on that?
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
C. Ludwig's Avatar
www.lms-efi.com
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 147
From: Floyds Knobs. IN
Think we got 8* caster. It's a poor mans source of camber gain in turns. With the kingpin layed back the more you turn the wheel the more camber gain there is.

I think you're right on the ride height. I had some big problems when lowering the car too much. The rear was very funny about ride height. You can get it low enough to bottom the trailing arms on the tub. When you do that everything goes to hell. Also, in the front you'll run into bump steer problems when going seriously low. As it is the IT rules limit you to a specific ride height. Was it 5" at the rocker? That's really close to as low as you want to go. Maybe too low.
Reply
Old May 22, 2007 | 10:55 AM
  #7  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by C. Ludwig
Think we got 8* caster. It's a poor mans source of camber gain in turns. With the kingpin layed back the more you turn the wheel the more camber gain there is.

I think you're right on the ride height. I had some big problems when lowering the car too much. The rear was very funny about ride height. You can get it low enough to bottom the trailing arms on the tub. When you do that everything goes to hell. Also, in the front you'll run into bump steer problems when going seriously low. As it is the IT rules limit you to a specific ride height. Was it 5" at the rocker? That's really close to as low as you want to go. Maybe too low.
i remember measureing it, but in like 03.... i wanna say the race car was like 23" from the ground to the top of the wheel opening?

the drift car and street cars got setup higher, like 24.5", which isnt too far off stock
Reply
Old May 22, 2007 | 12:37 PM
  #8  
wrankin's Avatar
Old Rotary Dog
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
The 2007 GCR sets minimum ride height as 5" to the bottom of the rocker panel (not including the welded seam). This is with driver out.

-b
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
Jan 25, 2024 03:34 AM
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Sep 28, 2015 09:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.