Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Make that 230rwhp streetport 13bre n/a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #51  
rotormind's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 363
Likes: 1
From: N.J
Please post a video
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #52  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
working on it.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #53  
need RX7's Avatar
Listen to King Diamond.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 13
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #54  
SleepeR1st's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 18
From: Candia, New Hampshire
I really love this thread. Keep the N/A tuning alive!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 12:20 AM
  #55  
quattro4now's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Looking at the dyno, I can't help but wonder if the REW intakes would be better suited for NA tuning. I know the RE flows better and produces less torque on a turbo motor where design and shape aren't as important as flow with the turbo providing most of the velocity.

Looking at the way torque drops off in the midrange, I wonder if the REW intakes and exhaust tuning could manage to make the same power with more torque overall.

Either way, awesome build and superb documentation!!

quattro
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 07:45 AM
  #56  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by quattro4now
on a turbo motor where design and shape aren't as important as flow with the turbo providing most of the velocity.
The velocity comes from the port. Intake design is ALWAYS important, you can just cover up your sins with more boost on a turbo engine. N/A keeps you on your toes.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #57  
quattro4now's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by peejay
The velocity comes from the port. Intake design is ALWAYS important, you can just cover up your sins with more boost on a turbo engine. N/A keeps you on your toes.
Exactly my point. You explained it better though.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 04:55 PM
  #58  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Dig it

Me, I want one of those sick IPRA Monster-Badass intake manifolds. They tend to go for about $5k Australian, and up, though...
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 05:24 PM
  #59  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,800
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Very impressive numbers Logan, if I had money left over after modding my FD I'd love to send my FC vert to ya
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #60  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Originally Posted by quattro4now
Looking at the dyno, I can't help but wonder if the REW intakes would be better suited for NA tuning. I know the RE flows better and produces less torque on a turbo motor where design and shape aren't as important as flow with the turbo providing most of the velocity.

Looking at the way torque drops off in the midrange, I wonder if the REW intakes and exhaust tuning could manage to make the same power with more torque overall.

Either way, awesome build and superb documentation!!

quattro
Torque is not dropping off in the midrange, its just going back to a non-resonance point in the power band. My header creates a great 3.5-4k bump in power, and again at 7-8k. On the FD intake.... been down that road a while ago. I switched intake manifolds to FD upper and lower, to see the results. The FD intake did not make ANY more torque anywhere than the RE intake. But the RE did produce MORE torque from 6,000 up. So the FD intake lost 20rwhp. And this was back when I was at 216 rwhp. Now the loss would be even greater. Simply put the FD intake is designed nice and long, for a very early peak torque.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #61  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Very impressive numbers Logan, if I had money left over after modding my FD I'd love to send my FC vert to ya
Thanks Rich! Gotta lay down some power in the sunny day cruiser too huh? Only way to do it
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 12:48 AM
  #62  
quattro4now's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by GtoRx7
Torque is not dropping off in the midrange, its just going back to a non-resonance point in the power band. My header creates a great 3.5-4k bump in power, and again at 7-8k. On the FD intake.... been down that road a while ago. I switched intake manifolds to FD upper and lower, to see the results. The FD intake did not make ANY more torque anywhere than the RE intake. But the RE did produce MORE torque from 6,000 up. So the FD intake lost 20rwhp. And this was back when I was at 216 rwhp. Now the loss would be even greater. Simply put the FD intake is designed nice and long, for a very early peak torque.
I must have forgotten that you tried the REW intakes. Its been awhile since I read the other two threads. Would cleaning up the inside of the plenum help keep in resonance, or would that be more akin to a drop in the bucket?

quattro
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 02:32 AM
  #63  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
Take something and get a bell mouth on that intake so it's shaped like a velocity stack and take off the air filter and I bet you break 235.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #64  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Originally Posted by quattro4now
I must have forgotten that you tried the REW intakes. Its been awhile since I read the other two threads. Would cleaning up the inside of the plenum help keep in resonance, or would that be more akin to a drop in the bucket?

quattro
Anything is possible, I definitely haven't ruled small things out. My first thought is the drop in the bucket though lol.


Originally Posted by Hyper4mance2k
Take something and get a bell mouth on that intake so it's shaped like a velocity stack and take off the air filter and I bet you break 235.
You are right, and I have definitely thought of that. Some friends speculated as well. Since its 4" now, it would be easy to throw a turbonetics bell mouth inlet on it. If I get a chance this will be on the list of the next dyno session. Along with the production header test.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #65  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
I wonder if extrude honing the intake manifold would net any gains?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 04:14 AM
  #66  
quattro4now's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
I wonder if extrude honing the intake manifold would net any gains?
The only problem I see with extrude honing is that it might smooth out the runners too much. The cast surface provides turbulent airflow that helps keep fuel from wetting the manifold walls. Its not a problem in efi piston engine intakes since the injectors more or less spray into the head. Carbs would be a different story.

Also, last I checked, extrude honing is pretty darn expensive. The place I looked at had rotary intakes list somewhere between $300 and $600. With prices like that I'd give flex honing some serious thought.

Last edited by quattro4now; Mar 4, 2009 at 04:18 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2009 | 07:30 PM
  #67  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
Originally Posted by GtoRx7
You are right, and I have definitely thought of that. Some friends speculated as well. Since its 4" now, it would be easy to throw a turbonetics bell mouth inlet on it. If I get a chance this will be on the list of the next dyno session. Along with the production header test.
OMG i'm bored at work. Post more pictures, some video's or throw that bell mouth on there and dyno it. I need my 7 fix for the day! lol
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #68  
rotormind's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 363
Likes: 1
From: N.J
Please update
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 12:55 AM
  #69  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Haha you guys are cracking me up. I want to post a video so badly, just so busy at the shop I cant seem to catch a break. I will take some photos of the whole car, so everyone can get a idea of how awesome the outside is.....or lack thereof haha. Makes for a semi-good sleeper though
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 07:37 PM
  #70  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by GtoRx7
Haha you guys are cracking me up. I want to post a video so badly, just so busy at the shop I cant seem to catch a break. I will take some photos of the whole car, so everyone can get a idea of how awesome the outside is.....or lack thereof haha. Makes for a semi-good sleeper though
show them the TEST MULE!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 03:04 AM
  #71  
quattro4now's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by GtoRx7
Yeah, NOPR is my boss
You heard the boss-man!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #72  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
don't worry about a video. I'm sure we could storke to just some good pix..
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #73  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by quattro4now
You heard the boss-man!
hahahahahaha

I vaguely remember that happening but completely forget what thread it's from. nice find!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #74  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by quattro4now
You heard the boss-man!
Pfft that NOPR shmuck doesn't even have a 7. He can't be the boss-man now!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 01:33 AM
  #75  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Pics of the 1st gen!

I snapped a few shots of the car finally. THese pics are shown being as-is driven condition, which it is never washed, and beat on all the time. Definitely one of my all time favorite cars though. And Max, aka NOPR thought of the "test mule" plate. It was a great fit for sure.

Name:  Logancars014.jpg
Views: 421
Size:  60.4 KB
Name:  Logancars018.jpg
Views: 410
Size:  88.7 KB
Name:  Logancars017.jpg
Views: 411
Size:  93.4 KB
Name:  Logancars015.jpg
Views: 459
Size:  91.3 KB
Name:  Logancars016.jpg
Views: 407
Size:  97.7 KB
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.