3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Question about injectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2018 | 01:17 PM
  #1  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
Question about injectors

Is there a reason anyone with 300-450whp doesn't just put ID2000 injectors in the primary rail and block of the secondaries? With the newer style injectors (better control) and good engine management, it seems like secondaries are no longer needed if shooting for less than 500whp.

I was thinking about upgrading and was surprised to see all the focus on secondaries like there was 10 years ago.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2018 | 02:06 PM
  #2  
H_M's Avatar
H_M
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 626
Likes: 95
From: CanuckVille
I think it's because many people a running a Power FC, which can't handle such large injectors for primaries.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2018 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
It's a good idea except that the primary injectors fire into the primary intake ports and the secondary injectors fire into the secondary intake ports.

I imagine you could just do primaries but I have a feeling there's a good reason to have fuel going to the secondary ports as well.

BTW, primary ports - the intake ports on the center iron on the engine. Secondary ports - the intake ports on the front and rear irons.

Dale
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2018 | 04:14 PM
  #4  
lOOkatme's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Colorado Springs, CO
You want to not exceed 80%duty cycle often, you need more than 4000cc injector when running over 325 to 350 who. I run an efr 8374 and have 5300cc of fuel and my highest duty cycle was around 75% or about 4000cc at 18psi at high elevation.

i used mine as example.

4000cc might be good to low to mid 300whp
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2018 | 08:41 PM
  #5  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
Show me where this magical 80% duty cycle limit comes from. 4000cc of injector (especially modern injectors) is plenty for 400whp. Even the stock system can do 300+whp.

If a modern injector can run at 80%, it is no less reliable at 90% or even 95% as long as the ecu is capable of controlling it (which any modern ecu is). This is not the old days with a microtech and 850cc stock injectors modded to 1300cc.

I hear Dale's point though. I wonder if there is an issue with fuel entering only from the center iron. It's a relatively small combustion chamber, I feel like it should still mix pretty thoroughly.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2018 | 12:17 AM
  #6  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
Regarding the 80% duty cycle concept, there is some duty cycle for most solenoids where they are receiving enough energy to simply stay open rather than closing. It's pretty common to see this in boost control solenoids, going from 80% to 90% duty won't often result in a different amount of boost. This is less common to happen with fuel injectors, but for older fuel injectors it might have been around 80-85%. Some designs will overheat if you run them at high duty cycle for an extended length of time, but I haven't heard about this happening for any OEM injectors. The main concern with running over 85% duty cycle on a modern ECU with modern injectors is you don't have much headroom left if conditions change. There might be 15% more fuel available, but there might not.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2018 | 07:42 AM
  #7  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
I imagine different types of injectors have different max duty cycles. I don't think that much of it is ECU control, it's a pretty basic thing the ECU is doing to send a pulse width to the injector. I could see the injector itself not being able to cope with higher duty cycles. Slower-responding injectors would have trouble at high duty cycles - they get a signal to open, they start opening, then by the time the next signal to fire comes they are already open. Or the fuel pressure keeps the injector from closing, or any number of factors, I think it starts getting technical.

I do think a lot of it has to do with the primary/secondary ports. The primary ports are a lot smaller than secondary for better idle and low-speed drivability. If you only had primary injectors you would only have an air/fuel mix going through the 2 smallest ports and the 2 large ports would only be pumping air. That would probably make for a weird air/fuel mix in the combustion chamber.

Dale
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 09:13 AM
  #8  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
You will never get as good atomization with running just 2 injectors vs 4. Also, unless you have a very good ecu like a new Haltech you will never get a good idle with 2000cc primaries.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 09:29 AM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
GSL-SE ran 680cc primary injectors only. Of course they were 80s injectors.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 12:21 PM
  #10  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
Originally Posted by arghx
GSL-SE ran 680cc primary injectors only. Of course they were 80s injectors.
Yes they did. Emissions and fuel economy were not as strict as they are now.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2018 | 07:50 AM
  #11  
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
Rotary Specialists
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 344
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by arghx
GSL-SE ran 680cc primary injectors only. Of course they were 80s injectors.
It was a N/A which is far more forgiving to lean conditions. It also had 3mm apex seals.

Originally Posted by TwinCharged RX7
Is there a reason anyone with 300-450whp doesn't just put ID2000 injectors in the primary rail and block of the secondaries? With the newer style injectors (better control) and good engine management, it seems like secondaries are no longer needed if shooting for less than 500whp.
.
.

The problem I foresee is that on a FI application the engine would not be getting any additional fuel beyond the closing point of the primary intake port, where the secondary runners would still be supplying forced air until a much later closing point, potentially causing a lean condition. There is a chance you could dump in enough fuel to maintain a decent fuel mixture. You could always try it and let everyone know how it worked for you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbrocke
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Mar 15, 2006 03:12 PM
BASTARD
Rotary Car Performance
11
Dec 31, 2003 02:37 PM
KraftDinner
Rotary Car Performance
12
Jul 26, 2002 03:57 PM
BoostedRotors
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
20
Apr 13, 2002 12:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.