RX8 Six Speed Advice
RX8 Six Speed Advice
My old N/A five speed in my 87 GXL has seen better days. I have needed a clutch since I bought the car 30,000+ miles and twenty plus years ago. I am also having some syncro issues, too. Synthetic oil in about 400+ miles of driving seems to have helped some. I am not really ready to pass judgement quite yet.
I am looking to get an S1 RX8 gear box. I know that a S1 is weaker and geared differently than and S2. I will need mounts, t2 clutch, an extension for the shifter, driveshaft, etc. However, for a cheap price of $250, I can get one.
Should I just wait for an S2/buy new or just live with the old box and get an new clutch? Certainly, it would be cheaper, easier to just do the clutch. Let's just set aside cost for the moment and decide that way. Is a scrap yard S1 too risky to buy? It could break quickly or already have issues.
Also, I have a 3.9 rear to pair with the new gearbox. I would like to track the car at some point.
I am looking to get an S1 RX8 gear box. I know that a S1 is weaker and geared differently than and S2. I will need mounts, t2 clutch, an extension for the shifter, driveshaft, etc. However, for a cheap price of $250, I can get one.
Should I just wait for an S2/buy new or just live with the old box and get an new clutch? Certainly, it would be cheaper, easier to just do the clutch. Let's just set aside cost for the moment and decide that way. Is a scrap yard S1 too risky to buy? It could break quickly or already have issues.
Also, I have a 3.9 rear to pair with the new gearbox. I would like to track the car at some point.
As someone who has spent plenty of time dealing with FC chassis configurations, my strong advice is to pass on the S1 RX-8 transmission. Even at $250, it is a false economy that will ultimately cost you more time, frustration, and money than doing a proper upgrade.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1,552
From: North Cackalacky
I actually run a S1 rx8 trans in my rx3 and I LOVE it! I think it is a great upgrade. I know there are a few FC's that run them at DGRR. I would say..... go for it! You will like it.
My old N/A five speed in my 87 GXL has seen better days. I have needed a clutch since I bought the car 30,000+ miles and twenty plus years ago. I am also having some syncro issues, too. Synthetic oil in about 400+ miles of driving seems to have helped some. I am not really ready to pass judgement quite yet.
I am looking to get an S1 RX8 gear box. I know that a S1 is weaker and geared differently than and S2. I will need mounts, t2 clutch, an extension for the shifter, driveshaft, etc. However, for a cheap price of $250, I can get one.
Should I just wait for an S2/buy new or just live with the old box and get an new clutch? Certainly, it would be cheaper, easier to just do the clutch. Let's just set aside cost for the moment and decide that way. Is a scrap yard S1 too risky to buy? It could break quickly or already have issues.
Also, I have a 3.9 rear to pair with the new gearbox. I would like to track the car at some point.
I am looking to get an S1 RX8 gear box. I know that a S1 is weaker and geared differently than and S2. I will need mounts, t2 clutch, an extension for the shifter, driveshaft, etc. However, for a cheap price of $250, I can get one.
Should I just wait for an S2/buy new or just live with the old box and get an new clutch? Certainly, it would be cheaper, easier to just do the clutch. Let's just set aside cost for the moment and decide that way. Is a scrap yard S1 too risky to buy? It could break quickly or already have issues.
Also, I have a 3.9 rear to pair with the new gearbox. I would like to track the car at some point.
no mater what this S1 box is aleast 20 year newer then ur current box
I can't really comment on the RX-8 box. I would like a six speed in my FC but since I plan to go turbo the S1 is probably a no go for me, but they are cheaper and much easier to find than the S2 so sometimes I think of just getting one anyway. What I did want to comment on is the rear gearing. I think 3.9 is the wrong way to go. The manual trans S1 Rx-8 had 4.44 rear gearing and the automatic had 4.3. IMO going shorter like the 4.3 from a GTUs (if you can find a set) would be better. Mine came with the 4.3 and I always liked it. I think it would pair nicely with the Rx-8 box. I drove a friend's vert with the 4.1 years ago and mine definitely felt better gearing wise. His had more mods than mine at the time.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1,552
From: North Cackalacky
I can't really comment on the RX-8 box. I would like a six speed in my FC but since I plan to go turbo the S1 is probably a no go for me, but they are cheaper and much easier to find than the S2 so sometimes I think of just getting one anyway. What I did want to comment on is the rear gearing. I think 3.9 is the wrong way to go. The manual trans S1 Rx-8 had 4.44 rear gearing and the automatic had 4.3. IMO going shorter like the 4.3 from a GTUs (if you can find a set) would be better. Mine came with the 4.3 and I always liked it. I think it would pair nicely with the Rx-8 box. I drove a friend's vert with the 4.1 years ago and mine definitely felt better gearing wise. His had more mods than mine at the time.
I actually have a 4.44 in th car now since that is the ratio that came in the Rx-8 rear end I swapped in a few years ago. I like it. I don't recal what my revs are at 80mph. Just a little lower than your's I think since I'm still running the stock GTUs gearbox with a .756 5th gear Running 17's but the tire size I run is roughly the same diameter as the stock 16's were.
Trending Topics
There is a lot here to consider. One of my big issues is that I would struggle with on a S1 transmission would be the lack of a hole at the shifter housing. And add to that, since I have the 3.9 already, it will likely work better with the the S2. I will probably wait for and S2 even it is 3 times more expensive. And I do plan on a higher HP build eventually, too.
From what little I know, the RX8 boxes are based on the competition gears. They just add the extra gear for first gear. The S2 is a bit wider at and 1st and 2nd, I think. 3rd is not spaced super well and 4th just totally sucks, it is just so wide. With a 4.3 rear, 3rd and 4th gear is much better but 1st gear is way ,way less usable. However, if you have a lower HP engine, it works well and is faster.
What I fear with that 4.3 setup and a higher HP engine, grabbing second coming out of a corner, if you are throttle happy, you would probably spin tire fairly easily.
Ultimately, the trans/rear gear that I really need will be what keeps my engine in the power band easier and works well on the roads/tracks that I would go around. In my testing on GT7 (I know, a video game, go ahead and chuckle), this combination at 230hp, is no faster or slower, for the most part on a one mile track than every other combination of the S1, 2 and rear gear combos listed here, that I tried. You will have faster or slower 0-60 times and lower fuel consumption but mostly, only lap times matter, for me. Second is fuel consumption.
The worst times was the 4.30 rear at 230 HP, not by much. Naturally, the results will vary some by track, though.
The best at 150hp was the 4.3. I am average at video driving so, there is that too. The best mod between all of the different gear box/ rear gear changes listed here, was better tires, by far.
Just as a side note, when testing a 5.12 rear end and the competition gears vs. the 3.9 and the S1 box, the 5.12 won on short track by just a little, a track that was 1:40 lap time, the 5.12 lost by 10 seconds. On a long track like you lucky people in France that ride at Spa, the 5.12 looses badly on the long first straight away. Dirt tracks are likely very different though.
Thanks to @peejay for pointing out the 3.9/S2 combo to me after inquiring about the 5.12 setup. Even if you can keep the rear gear from overheating, the drive shaft spins so fast that is causes premature wear. Also, he pointed out that his rally car was most fuel efficient around 4,000 rpm or so, if I remember correctly.
Also, this not very helpful for those of you that don't go for lap times. Gas mileage or racing your friend light to light at low speed might be all that you really care about so, choose wisely.
From what little I know, the RX8 boxes are based on the competition gears. They just add the extra gear for first gear. The S2 is a bit wider at and 1st and 2nd, I think. 3rd is not spaced super well and 4th just totally sucks, it is just so wide. With a 4.3 rear, 3rd and 4th gear is much better but 1st gear is way ,way less usable. However, if you have a lower HP engine, it works well and is faster.
What I fear with that 4.3 setup and a higher HP engine, grabbing second coming out of a corner, if you are throttle happy, you would probably spin tire fairly easily.
Ultimately, the trans/rear gear that I really need will be what keeps my engine in the power band easier and works well on the roads/tracks that I would go around. In my testing on GT7 (I know, a video game, go ahead and chuckle), this combination at 230hp, is no faster or slower, for the most part on a one mile track than every other combination of the S1, 2 and rear gear combos listed here, that I tried. You will have faster or slower 0-60 times and lower fuel consumption but mostly, only lap times matter, for me. Second is fuel consumption.
The worst times was the 4.30 rear at 230 HP, not by much. Naturally, the results will vary some by track, though.
The best at 150hp was the 4.3. I am average at video driving so, there is that too. The best mod between all of the different gear box/ rear gear changes listed here, was better tires, by far.
Just as a side note, when testing a 5.12 rear end and the competition gears vs. the 3.9 and the S1 box, the 5.12 won on short track by just a little, a track that was 1:40 lap time, the 5.12 lost by 10 seconds. On a long track like you lucky people in France that ride at Spa, the 5.12 looses badly on the long first straight away. Dirt tracks are likely very different though.
Thanks to @peejay for pointing out the 3.9/S2 combo to me after inquiring about the 5.12 setup. Even if you can keep the rear gear from overheating, the drive shaft spins so fast that is causes premature wear. Also, he pointed out that his rally car was most fuel efficient around 4,000 rpm or so, if I remember correctly.
Also, this not very helpful for those of you that don't go for lap times. Gas mileage or racing your friend light to light at low speed might be all that you really care about so, choose wisely.
Last edited by Jeff76; Jun 1, 2026 at 07:38 PM.
In my testing on GT7 (I know, a video game, go ahead and chuckle), this combination at 230hp, is no faster or slower, for the most part on a one mile track than every other combination of the S1, 2 and rear gear combos listed here, that I tried. You will have faster or slower 0-60 times and lower fuel consumption but mostly, only lap times matter, for me. Second is fuel consumption.
The worst times was the 4.30 rear at 230 HP, not by much. Naturally, the results will vary some by track, though.
The best at 150hp was the 4.3. I am average at video driving so, there is that too. The best mod between all of the different gear box/ rear gear changes listed here, was better tires, by far.
Just as a side note, when testing a 5.12 rear end and the competition gears vs. the 3.9 and the S1 box, the 5.12 won on short track by just a little, a track that was 1:40 lap time, the 5.12 lost by 10 seconds. On a long track like you lucky people in France that ride at Spa, the 5.12 looses badly on the long first straight away. Dirt tracks are likely very different though.
Thanks to @peejay for pointing out the 3.9/S2 combo to me after inquiring about the 5.12 setup. Even if you can keep the rear gear from overheating, the drive shaft spins so fast that is causes premature wear. Also, he pointed out that his rally car was most fuel efficient around 4,000 rpm or so, if I remember correctly.
Also, this not very helpful for those of you that don't go for lap times. Gas mileage or racing your friend light to light at low speed might be all that you really care about so, choose wisely.
The worst times was the 4.30 rear at 230 HP, not by much. Naturally, the results will vary some by track, though.
The best at 150hp was the 4.3. I am average at video driving so, there is that too. The best mod between all of the different gear box/ rear gear changes listed here, was better tires, by far.
Just as a side note, when testing a 5.12 rear end and the competition gears vs. the 3.9 and the S1 box, the 5.12 won on short track by just a little, a track that was 1:40 lap time, the 5.12 lost by 10 seconds. On a long track like you lucky people in France that ride at Spa, the 5.12 looses badly on the long first straight away. Dirt tracks are likely very different though.
Thanks to @peejay for pointing out the 3.9/S2 combo to me after inquiring about the 5.12 setup. Even if you can keep the rear gear from overheating, the drive shaft spins so fast that is causes premature wear. Also, he pointed out that his rally car was most fuel efficient around 4,000 rpm or so, if I remember correctly.
Also, this not very helpful for those of you that don't go for lap times. Gas mileage or racing your friend light to light at low speed might be all that you really care about so, choose wisely.
The worst times was the 4.30 rear at 230 HP, not by much. Naturally, the results will vary some by track, though.
The best at 150hp was the 4.3. I am average at video driving so, there is that too. The best mod between all of the different gear box/ rear gear changes listed here, was better tires, by far.
P.S. Car used was 91 Efini Rx-7 with engine balance tuning giving an 8200rpm redline set to 276hp with full suspension on Sports Soft tires with front and rear aero adding downforce.
Last edited by Dak; Jun 3, 2026 at 01:35 PM. Reason: clarity
Thanks for the reminder about the 350z one. I will have to do more "testing". funny thing is that when I typed the adapter kit into my search, I had it bookmarked already. 
I remember seeing a build thread with this transmission. I thought that there was some... adjustments...... that needed made to the trans tunnel. Maybe, I am just remembering wrong.
It's likely a mod that will be to expensive, for now, unfortunately.

I remember seeing a build thread with this transmission. I thought that there was some... adjustments...... that needed made to the trans tunnel. Maybe, I am just remembering wrong.
It's likely a mod that will be to expensive, for now, unfortunately.
Thanks for the reminder about the 350z one. I will have to do more "testing". funny thing is that when I typed the adapter kit into my search, I had it bookmarked already. 
I remember seeing a build thread with this transmission. I thought that there was some... adjustments...... that needed made to the trans tunnel. Maybe, I am just remembering wrong.
It's likely a mod that will be to expensive, for now, unfortunately.

I remember seeing a build thread with this transmission. I thought that there was some... adjustments...... that needed made to the trans tunnel. Maybe, I am just remembering wrong.
It's likely a mod that will be to expensive, for now, unfortunately.
I did some quick searching and both the 350z and 370z use the same ratios. Not sure what the actual differences are but one of the companies that make adapters to put a T56 bellhousing on the CD009 had three different ones for the different year ranges.The transmission itself isn't the expensive part. Looking on Car-part.com the older 350z ones are cheaper and easier to find than the S2 Rx-8 ones. Average $800 to $1500. The 370z's are more than the Rx-8 box but much easier to find. Multiple ones within 500 miles of me. Problem is the Fisch kit is like $3000 or more plus cost of transmission. ROTARY to CD009/CD00A Adapter System – FischRacingTech There is hope of a cheaper option though, there is a guy in this thread JK40C/CD009 Transmission from 370Z on 13B - Page 14 - RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum that made his own adapter a couple of years ago and used a TII bellhousing. I commented on the thread but no response. I need to PM him and hope he's still around.
Replacing the RX8 4th gear with the 6 speed Miata 4th gear works well. According to an AI search, in the real world, it can be done. Also, I asked if the complete gear set can be swapped, that was also a yes. Certainly, the Miata set isn't as robust, even though the weight of the box and ratios are very similar.
Comparing cost though, not sure.
Comparing cost though, not sure.
Replacing the RX8 4th gear with the 6 speed Miata 4th gear works well. According to an AI search, in the real world, it can be done. Also, I asked if the complete gear set can be swapped, that was also a yes. Certainly, the Miata set isn't as robust, even though the weight of the box and ratios are very similar.
Comparing cost though, not sure.
Comparing cost though, not sure.
It would likely be expensive and S1 only, think. I typed this into the search and got slightly different answers. And I also clicked the link, refreshed and got two different answers. 
https://www.google.com/search?q=six+...t=gws-wiz-serp
Swapping 4th seems strange because the gear mating type is different, I think and might be possible
https://www.google.com/search?q=swap...t=gws-wiz-serp
Fear not race fans... someone has a drop in option.
https://speedtekautoracing.com/produ...gearset-dogbox
All of these mods are for the S1 box. Will the drop in set be strong as a dog configuration? Let's hope so.
And after all of that, the Nissan box might still be the better option.
Edit: I did find other options for the drop in dog style with a search,too.

https://www.google.com/search?q=six+...t=gws-wiz-serp
Swapping 4th seems strange because the gear mating type is different, I think and might be possible
https://www.google.com/search?q=swap...t=gws-wiz-serp
Fear not race fans... someone has a drop in option.
https://speedtekautoracing.com/produ...gearset-dogbox
All of these mods are for the S1 box. Will the drop in set be strong as a dog configuration? Let's hope so.
And after all of that, the Nissan box might still be the better option.

Edit: I did find other options for the drop in dog style with a search,too.
Last edited by Jeff76; Jun 4, 2026 at 07:37 PM.
That Speedtek dog engagement gearset is intriguing. I've kicked around dog boxes as there is a company that does face plated dog engagement gears for the TII gearbox, but I really want a 6-speed. Speedtek says they handle 600BHP which converts to 591.78hp which is more than I plan to make. Since they are in Australia I wonder if that price is in Aus. dollars. If so, it's less than $3000 in US dollars plus shipping. I've found S1 boxes for under $500 in my area, so total cost may be less than the 350/370z conversion IF I could do the gearset install myself. I wonder how hard it is to do transmission work. I think I'll test the Speedtek ratios tomorrow.
I am not sure that you could easily street those type of gears, unfortunately. I am kinda curious is that or other companies could build ones with more street-able version.
I think there is a way to make the S1 series tougher, reliable and add the 4th gear. I need to do more research.
I think there is a way to make the S1 series tougher, reliable and add the 4th gear. I need to do more research.
Well, I tested the Speedtek ratios and I like them, but back to the real world. I'll have to see what direction I take this car before I commit to dog engagement. I'd like to start doing track days and head in a more track focused direction while at the same time keeping it street able as it will be mostly driven on the street, but not as a daily driver. I've watched videos and you can drive them on the street, but you have to "learn" how to as you have to drive them different than one with synchro's. Maybe there is gearset for the S1 that fixes it's issues. This guy put straight cut gears in his
but it was $9000 I'm assuming Australian which is still $6351.57 US dollars. It may be they are out there but the 350/370z option makes more financial sense depending on the application.
Yeah, it is the Gold standard according to AI. You would have to be one motivated person to do it another way, from what research I have done so far, as long as you are talking 6 speeds anyway. The synchro's are different from the Miata to RX8. If the Miata gears do fit on the RX8 shafts it is a lot of work to remove every gear, synchro, fork and replace/upgrade. The nice thing is that if I was to try a S1 and run it on the track, Mazda makes upgraded Miata parts that address the weaknesses in the earlier made 6 speed boxes, I think. You just need to be verified for their race group with one event a year to buy the parts. It might be an affordable option then. I am going to put a pin in this for now and research when I have time.
If anyone has any input, please let me know. thanks!
If anyone has any input, please let me know. thanks!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EmboRotary
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
14
Feb 28, 2024 07:03 PM
nycgps
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Mar 31, 2011 09:23 AM







