3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Is It Me or The Twins???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-14, 02:25 PM
  #1  
Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rx7 SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is It Me or The Twins???

Before I get started, I love the stock twin setup on my FD, not going single and will probably never go single since I have a very nice 6266 single on the FC. That being said, when I purchased my FD in March-April of this year the twins, I believe, were sucking oil due to the fact that there was a significant amount of oil built up on my intercooler couplers and intake crevices and the car constantly smoked. No problem, replaced them while changing out my coolant seals . Got about several hundred miles with no smoking but now the car smokes during start up for about 10-15 seconds which didn't bother me at all until I pulled a coupler off and saw a hole bunch of oil built up on them yet again. This leads me to believe the turbos (which were used, low mileage) are sucking oil again.

The car is down for the winter so I can swap them out again but I want to know if maybe there's something I'm doing wrong or don't know about keeping the fd twins going or are they just that unreliable?

I don't track the FD per say, but I live on the Blue Ridge Parkway so about 90% of the 3500 miles I've put on it have been through the mountains in boost. I keep the boost on the low boost setting which is 10 psi.

Before I go tearing these turbos off again, any advice on what I can do differently this time or maybe something else leaking?



P.S. Like I said above, not going single

Thanks,

~Anthony
Old 12-05-14, 02:35 PM
  #2  
Time or Money, Pick one

iTrader: (37)
 
silverTRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Torrance, ca.
Posts: 3,353
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
Do you have a catch can? Sounds like that could be your issue since you're driving in the mountains so much.
Old 12-05-14, 02:46 PM
  #3  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
The stock PCV system vents into the front turbo inlet and basically doesn't work. Get a catch can and it should help greatly. If it doesn't you have a bad oil seal in the turbos and they will need to be replaced at some point. If you are insistent on staying with twins, a set of BNR Stage 3s will be your best bet. Otherwise a known good used set of stock twins. I have two or three sets laying around with low mileage.
Old 12-06-14, 08:40 AM
  #4  
Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rx7 SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by silverTRD
Do you have a catch can? Sounds like that could be your issue since you're driving in the mountains so much.
I don't have a catch can and the thought never crossed my mind, I think that's exactly what it is .

Originally Posted by IRPerformance
The stock PCV system vents into the front turbo inlet and basically doesn't work. Get a catch can and it should help greatly. If it doesn't you have a bad oil seal in the turbos and they will need to be replaced at some point. If you are insistent on staying with twins, a set of BNR Stage 3s will be your best bet. Otherwise a known good used set of stock twins. I have two or three sets laying around with low mileage.
You'll be the first one I contact if I find these turbos to be shot again.

Would love the BNRs, but they seem a little too pricey for such small gains due to the restrictive exhaust manifold, IMO... Or are they just more reliable?
Old 12-06-14, 06:33 PM
  #5  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7 SE
I don't have a catch can and the thought never crossed my mind, I think that's exactly what it is .



You'll be the first one I contact if I find these turbos to be shot again.

Would love the BNRs, but they seem a little too pricey for such small gains due to the restrictive exhaust manifold, IMO... Or are they just more reliable?
I was / am a die hard twins fan . You can make alot more power out of the BNR reliably .

Lots of people are in the 400 whp mark with the BNR twins , and they are quite reliable as they can run pretty high PSI ,

ofcourse you'd need injectors that can support the power , Fuel pump as well , and a good tune ..

Now .. the third and actually Better option is going single .. I know I know BLAH BLAH BLAH !! LAG TORQUE take a look at this https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo...d-dyno-956766/

thats what modern BB turbos are capable of if done correctly
Old 12-08-14, 08:21 AM
  #6  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
+1 on catch can. Turbos may be fine, actually.

Also, many times rotaries smoke a bit on startup, that's probably not the turbos. Bad oil seals on turbos usually mean a smoke show or strong oil burning smell after boosting them.

My catch can is always about 1/4-1/2 full at an oil change with nasty crap. That's all crap that would have gone in the IC and intake plumbing.

Dale
Old 12-08-14, 10:22 AM
  #7  
Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rx7 SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for the advice guys, installing a catch can will be the next project on the list.
Old 12-08-14, 01:03 PM
  #8  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7 SE
Thanks for the advice guys, installing a catch can will be the next project on the list.
These cars don't need catch cans

Don't over fill the oil and you will be fine.

Don't go any higher than 1/2 way up on the dip stick fill indicator marks. It's really that f#cking simple.
Old 12-09-14, 08:41 AM
  #9  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
These cars don't need catch cans

Don't over fill the oil and you will be fine.

Don't go any higher than 1/2 way up on the dip stick fill indicator marks. It's really that f#cking simple.
I only fill my car up 1/2 on the dipstick with oil, catch can still gets crap in it. A lot of it is emulsified water/oil mix from water vapor in air.

Stock, this is all going to be sucked through the primary turbo inlet duct. I'd rather trap it and dispose of it than have it coat my IC.

BTW, I have used these catch cans with great results -

Amazon.com: Jaz Products 605-375-01 Mini-Breather Tank with 0.375" Fittings: Automotive Amazon.com: Jaz Products 605-375-01 Mini-Breather Tank with 0.375" Fittings: Automotive

It's reasonably priced, small, has a proper filter, and easy to mount. I have a bracket on my master cylinder this attaches to, then I have 2 lines running from the 2 oil fill neck nipples to the 2 nipples on the catch can. Super easy.

Dale
Old 12-09-14, 11:47 AM
  #10  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
It really depends on the car. The higher boost you run, the harder you drive the car, the more g forces you induce when cornering, the more oil gets pushed out of the oil neck. The stock system dumps it into the primary turbo inlet, which is why you get oil in the intercooler piping and sometimes smoke. Engine health, seal clearancing, etc all affect the amount of blow by and crank case pressure an engine has. I rather run a catch can than run the car low on oil. An oil soaked intercooler isn't as efficient as a clean one. Cheap insurance.
Old 12-09-14, 12:32 PM
  #11  
ArmitageFD3S

iTrader: (13)
 
ArmitageGVR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 2,238
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
If you're making a lot of hard right turns on your mountain runs, it's a common issue that oil gets sucked right out of the filler neck through the PCV systems and into your turbos, intake, I/C, etc. In addition to a catch can, installing a baffled filler neck can help to mitigate this problem.
Old 12-09-14, 12:43 PM
  #12  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Can only base this stuff off my own personal experience so as always YMMV. I'm just saying I don't need a catch can on my daily drivers and only on my track car if I put too much oil in or have some sort of fuel delivery issue which just happened with the new build but that has now been corrected.

Every single time I buy a car the oil is over filled or they put in 4 quarts and f#ck me up and the car is blowing smoke and filling the charge tubes etc... Once I change the oil myself and put in 3 quarts no more issues.

These cars have lots of problems but oiling the engine is not one of them and you don't need much oil. If you enjoy filling your oil to the top to contribute donations to your catch can and throwing oil all over your engine bay no worries but I don't recommend EVER filling over the 1/2 way mark.
Old 12-09-14, 12:47 PM
  #13  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by DaleClark
I only fill my car up 1/2 on the dipstick with oil, catch can still gets crap in it. A lot of it is emulsified water/oil mix from water vapor in air.

Stock, this is all going to be sucked through the primary turbo inlet duct. I'd rather trap it and dispose of it than have it coat my IC.

BTW, I have used these catch cans with great results -

Amazon.com: Jaz Products 605-375-01 Mini-Breather Tank with 0.375" Fittings: Automotive

It's reasonably priced, small, has a proper filter, and easy to mount. I have a bracket on my master cylinder this attaches to, then I have 2 lines running from the 2 oil fill neck nipples to the 2 nipples on the catch can. Super easy.

Dale
Yep

If you need a catch can I'd get this one
Old 12-09-14, 01:35 PM
  #14  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
Yep

If you need a catch can I'd get this one
at what point does a catch can become necessary , I've had that whole oil in primary turbo issue for a long time and I just kind of ignored it since I knew where it was coming from . sort of just figured it as normal
Old 12-09-14, 04:44 PM
  #15  
Full Member

 
neil_jdmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Strange!! I think you have just been unlucky with your used twins tbh. I have ran at 1.2 bar or 17psi on standard 94 twins for the last 2 years and they have been ran hard for the past 7 years at 1bar and are still going fine. Very little oil in ic pipes and no smoke at all. All in they have done 30k miles from a rebuild
Old 12-10-14, 06:05 AM
  #16  
Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rx7 SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by neil_jdmr
Strange!! I think you have just been unlucky with your used twins tbh. I have ran at 1.2 bar or 17psi on standard 94 twins for the last 2 years and they have been ran hard for the past 7 years at 1bar and are still going fine. Very little oil in ic pipes and no smoke at all. All in they have done 30k miles from a rebuild
Really? When u say ran hard is that just in a straight line or track days as well?

After putting on my Hankook Ventus RS3 tires I was curious about the g forces I was experiencing due to the increased grip so I did some datalogging and found that I'm seeing an average of 1.0 g's, sometimes more, around these mountain roads. You mix that up with elevation changes and I suppose it would accumulate a lot of oil.
Old 12-10-14, 10:08 AM
  #17  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7 SE
Really? When u say ran hard is that just in a straight line or track days as well?

After putting on my Hankook Ventus RS3 tires I was curious about the g forces I was experiencing due to the increased grip so I did some datalogging and found that I'm seeing an average of 1.0 g's, sometimes more, around these mountain roads. You mix that up with elevation changes and I suppose it would accumulate a lot of oil.
Too much oil means the oil will run up the neck and into the intake and there is no way to avoid it other than a catch can or fill neck/oil pan baffles etc... OR run 3/4 to 1 quart low. If the extra oil is running out of the engine there is no need to put it in to begin with. If the oil was constantly running out of your engine you wouldn't have any oil. You only fill the catch can when you overfill your oil.

I attribute this catch can over fill thing to people being scared to death to run low oil BUT why worry if the oil is just running out of the engine anyway. It just makes no sense at all.

You want an easy solution don't fill your oil up

If you are getting oil in your catch can still you have an engine problem. I've been tracking this car at VIR for 10 plus years and I don't fill my catch can AT ALL and t3 is a fast nasty left hand turn.
Old 12-10-14, 10:24 AM
  #18  
Rotary Specialists
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (11)
 
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,826
Received 309 Likes on 180 Posts
Checking the oil is part of my checklist prior to putting cars on our dyno. Most come in over-filled, which causes the catch can to fill up after a couple pulls, then puddle up on the floor if not monitored. I have just started dumping 1/2 before we start.

I have a theory that the over-filling is brought on by the idea that the rotary uses a qt./1000 miles, so "why not throw a little extra in?". The problem with this thought process is a lot of the people are running premix without an OMP, which means the engine will use no oil. Not to mention the other issues that arise, from developing oil leaks at the pan seal to filling the intake with oil even with a functioning OMP.
Old 12-10-14, 12:01 PM
  #19  
Full Member

 
neil_jdmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rx7 SE
Really? When u say ran hard is that just in a straight line or track days as well?

After putting on my Hankook Ventus RS3 tires I was curious about the g forces I was experiencing due to the increased grip so I did some datalogging and found that I'm seeing an average of 1.0 g's, sometimes more, around these mountain roads. You mix that up with elevation changes and I suppose it would accumulate a lot of oil.
Mostly road but as I live in the country hard corners are regular plus more recently I've been going all out on trackdays. My oil is always full on the dipstick and tbh doesn't ever really use any either. I use cheapo 10/40 mineral and change it after a trackday or 3k miles whichever come first.

I can honestly say I have never had oil in the pipes from twin pack to tb. A light amount of black gunk on the joiners from time to time but I mean light amount. Also never had any smoke on boost either tbh bit of flame but never been smokey.
Old 12-10-14, 12:08 PM
  #20  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by neil_jdmr
Mostly road but as I live in the country hard corners are regular plus more recently I've been going all out on trackdays. My oil is always full on the dipstick and tbh doesn't ever really use any either. I use cheapo 10/40 mineral and change it after a trackday or 3k miles whichever come first.

I can honestly say I have never had oil in the pipes from twin pack to tb. A light amount of black gunk on the joiners from time to time but I mean light amount. Also never had any smoke on boost either tbh bit of flame but never been smokey.

Do you run the factory PCV system ?
Old 12-10-14, 12:14 PM
  #21  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,222
Received 767 Likes on 509 Posts
Another thing to check if you have oil in your charge pipes is check for boost leaks.

IDK why but whenever I have had a boost leak and was overspeeding the compressor wheel the turbo would puke oil into the turbo inlet/charge pipes/intercooler.
Old 12-11-14, 05:36 AM
  #22  
Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rx7 SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
Another thing to check if you have oil in your charge pipes is check for boost leaks.

IDK why but whenever I have had a boost leak and was overspeeding the compressor wheel the turbo would puke oil into the turbo inlet/charge pipes/intercooler.
Interesting, yes I found my primary turbo charge pipe fasteners had worked themselves loose creating a massive boost leak. Learning some good stuff here
Old 12-13-14, 02:07 PM
  #23  
Full Member

 
neil_jdmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tem120
Do you run the factory PCV system ?
Yes,

I run it completely stock aside from boost, fuel, ignition. Stock twins stock injectors blah blah
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM



Quick Reply: Is It Me or The Twins???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.