3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

How to Test your solenoids, actuators, and other turbo stuff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2014 | 09:54 AM
  #76  
ArmitageGVR4's Avatar
ArmitageFD3S
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 26
From: Herndon, Virginia
Great thread! Everything I needed to figure out my secondary turbo issues was here. I ended up ordering 9 new solenoids from Mazda (all except the purge solenoid and the WGA/PCA solenoids that I already replaced with MAC). At room temp, some of the brand new units tested out fine with 9v, but some were sluggish switching while under vacuum and some wouldn't switch at all. They all tested fine with 12v. YMMV.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 12:47 PM
  #77  
oneflytrini's Avatar
Stabbed by a pen
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 2
From: Tamarac, Florida
Any info on testing turbo wastegate actuators?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 07:43 PM
  #78  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Plug one nipple, apply pressure to the other, and if it opens at the specified pressure and does not leak, it passes.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 07:44 PM
  #79  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Originally Posted by ArmitageGVR4
Great thread! Everything I needed to figure out my secondary turbo issues was here. I ended up ordering 9 new solenoids from Mazda (all except the purge solenoid and the WGA/PCA solenoids that I already replaced with MAC). At room temp, some of the brand new units tested out fine with 9v, but some were sluggish switching while under vacuum and some wouldn't switch at all. They all tested fine with 12v. YMMV.
That's not surprising - more voltage = stronger magnetic pull.

The "release" test however is based on internal friction and the strength of the plunger spring and should not be driven by voltage / field strength.

David
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 10:05 AM
  #80  
r074r'/ |\|00B
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: KC, KS
Originally Posted by beckrx
I also learned from Ray that although the solenoids all look alike, there are specific part numbers for specific solenoids. The following are the number of solenoids needed, the part number and the purpose.
(3) 1480-13-240A. Double throttle control, charge control and charge relief.
(1) 1481-13-240A. Pressure regulator control.
(2) 1482-13-240A. Secondary air bypass, EGR.
(1) N390-18-741. Turbo control.
(1) N3A7-18-741. Secondary air switching valve.

Finally, the painted numbering/lettering sequence on the solenoid identifies what they are for. Ray said that there are two rows of painted numbers on each solenoid: the upper and the lower rows. The lower row identifies the solenoids as follows:
"1" corresponds to part number 1482-13-240A. Secondary air bypass, EGR.
"2" corresponds to part number 1481-13-240A. Pressure regulator control.
"3" corresponds to part number 1480-13-240A. Double throttle control, charge control and charge relief.
"82" corresponds to part number N390-18-741. Turbo control.
"17 corresponds to N3A7-18-741. Secondary air switching valve.
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
They are certainly marked per location and the filter basket will be in the right location for you. But if you ignore the markings and move the filter baskets around I have yet to find any difference in build and performance.

Dave
I have been chasing a boost problem, thread here: https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generati...usion-1090414/

I just pulled and re-tested all my existing solenoids and they appear to be good.

I ordered a brand new set of solenoids from Ray, not knowing there were potentially different solenoids. I just told him the solenoid names via e-mail, and so I received:
(2) 1480-13-240A. charge control and charge relief.
(1) N390-18-741. Turbo control.
(1) N3A1-18-741. Turbo control (Vacuum)

Upon comparing to my old solenoids that tested good, I was using a 1480-13-240A solenoid for turbo control where I should have had N390-18-741. All of my old working solenoids were the same, (1480-13-240A). If my boost issue fixed we shall see if that 3-way turbo control really is different or not. Either that or I had a bad solenoid that was testing good.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 10:42 AM
  #81  
TomU's Avatar
It Just Feels Right
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 349
From: Arlington, VA
did you test your good solenoids hot? I had a bunch fail hot that passed cold. Remember, they are supposed to work in a hot environment.

Also test the new ones as well. I read somewhere (maybe in this thread) that the new ones are not necessarily new and have been sitting some time and occasionally test bad.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 11:37 AM
  #82  
r074r'/ |\|00B
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: KC, KS
Yes, I tested them all both cold & hot.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2015 | 09:15 PM
  #83  
r074r'/ |\|00B
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: KC, KS
Car boost perfectly now! Either the solenoids are picky or something was testing correctly but didn't work when it counted.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2016 | 03:21 AM
  #84  
mpk490p's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 425
Likes: 4
From: UK
should the turbo control actuator hold pressure and vac as shown in this diagram?
i can't get my first turbo to boost past 4.5 / 5 psi chased everything else and the vac system is fine wastegate and pre control all working and connected as should

thanks in advance


m?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2016 | 01:20 PM
  #85  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Yes, the actuator should. The pressure and vacuum are applied simultaneously in operation to make the actuator operate quickly and shut the TCV securely.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2016 | 02:42 AM
  #86  
mpk490p's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 425
Likes: 4
From: UK
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Yes, the actuator should. The pressure and vacuum are applied simultaneously in operation to make the actuator operate quickly and shut the TCV securely.
Thanks, checked all my vac lines and had this off the car and its not holding pressure on the side fitting so just waiting on a replacement
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2025 | 02:58 PM
  #87  
need-a-t2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 539
From: binghamton, ny
First off, let me apologize for the 9 year comeback for this thread, but it's got lots of good info and seemed like the best place for this. I'm currently going thru an FD and started testing the solenoids. I had 1 solenoid that was DOA; there was no continuity on the coil so I thought it would be fun to see what's inside so people can see how they work and what the failure points really are. So this is the insides of the solenoid:


The bullet looking guy with the black tip is the only moving part. The black tip is actually a rubber seal that seals up against another cone inside the solenoid.


When the coil is not energized that little spring pushes the tip of the plunger into the housing sealing the "A" to "B" path and leaving the "B" to "C" path open. Then the coil energizes it pulls the plunger back into the right most port housing. There's an oring seal on the backside of the plunger that seals against the housing opening the "A" to "B" path and closing the "B" to "C" path. This solenoid likely would have leaked out port "C" due to the corrosion on the right port housing.


Interestingly enough all that debris on the plunger seal was inside the solenoid already which made me think that some of the failed solenoids might just need a good cleaning if the plunger is still moving fine. I had a few solenoids that leaked a tiny bit so I thought i'd try giving them the old razzle dazzle and see if they came back. I popped the whole solenoid into an ultrisonic cleaner with a little simple green and warm water in it. During the cleaning I did actuate the solenoid for a bit, and after the bath I immediate flushed them with WD40 to remove any remaining water and cycled the solenoid several times. To my enjoyment, every single solenoid that I cleaned is holding pressure and vac now. Your results may vary, but it worked really well for me and is certainly worth a try if you have access to an ultrasonic cleaner.

Last edited by need-a-t2; Jan 31, 2025 at 03:01 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2025 | 04:57 PM
  #88  
ZE Power MX6's Avatar
Boilermakers!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (170)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 379
From: Chicago, IL
That’s very good info! I recently bought a few of these from Mazda, and they were all DOA, I’m gonna have to try this out.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2025 | 05:04 PM
  #89  
boostin13b's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 400
From: Tampa, Florida
Nice to see this. Its kind of what I had been thinking. Not much to go wrong with these aside from the plastic being super brittle with heat and age. I don't see coils really going bad because they aren't high current. Debris in the system is a definite possibility. If you can pull them off without them breaking them, cleaning would be an option but that would be the hardest part IMO. I've done the same with new solenoids. They may "fail" a test on delivery but they could just need cleared out. Manufacturing debris could be inside and after a few cycles under pressure or vacuum they may self clean.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2025 | 12:17 PM
  #90  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Well done.

I recall that some failed solenoids would just leak, some didn't cycle, some cycled slowly, etc. The ultrasonic makes excellent sense. I always assumed there were elastomer seals inside that were degrading but those overall looked pretty good. So that means maybe it's mostly dirt causing issues.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2025 | 02:17 PM
  #91  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
i just found this, which might be an interesting choice for someone with an aftermarket ECU.
GM 12649146, turbo solenoid for a Chevy Malibu.
it looks a lot like the Mazda part, but with an EVI connector


Reply
Old Feb 5, 2025 | 10:05 AM
  #92  
tangoshark's Avatar
sherevvs
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 221
Likes: 3
From: Lake Oswego OR USA
wow this forum is still alive after all these years. so cool to see. I joined over a decade ago but haven't been back for a while
Reply
Old May 16, 2025 | 01:49 PM
  #93  
FooZiken's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 3
I'm in the process of solenoid testing now and some of rack solenoids doesn't release pressure fast enough when energized but they hold vacuum so I can use them where there is only vacuum. And some doesn't hold vacuum good enough when energized but hold and release pressure fast as per first post. So could you pls point me where I can use "vacuum good" solenoids and where "pressure good" solenoids?
Thanks
Reply
Old May 17, 2025 | 10:05 PM
  #94  
chicagozer's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 9
From: Foster City, CA
Pressure lines only in one of these diagrams.

https://www.fd3s.net/vacuum_hose_replacement.html
Reply
Old May 19, 2025 | 01:28 PM
  #95  
FooZiken's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 3
Thanks! Exactly what I need
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seven1997
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Apr 6, 2012 01:54 PM
superfastrx7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Oct 19, 2005 02:10 PM
dgeesaman
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Jul 10, 2004 10:19 AM
Redrotor
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
Mar 28, 2002 12:43 AM
TainoIndian
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Nov 29, 2001 09:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.