3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Difference between 93 and 94+

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
L8NightDrifter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Difference between 93 and 94+

ive heard froma few ppl on this forum that 93's are crappier than 94 and up.
i have a 93 dammit.

is there any difference between the two besides interior panels? if so please list the differences.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #2  
rotoboy661's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
From: kali
damn man do a search so many threads about this topic

yes the interior is not diff just the texture of the plastics is

and 94's have a pass airbag

mike
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:33 PM
  #3  
L8NightDrifter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
so thats is right? there are no other differences?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:42 PM
  #4  
ROTORhead93's Avatar
Insane Burnout
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
From: Pleasanton, CA
the 93 r1 came with a stiffer suspension than the 94-95 r2, which came with a bit softer suspension
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:45 PM
  #5  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/93-95-a-351750/

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/year-best-272648/
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #6  
chris7777777's Avatar
Bzzzzz
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: NW of Toronto, Canada
Interior panels made of better material, exterior doorhandles made of better material,
main piping in the engine made of plastic on the 94 and up, where was metal in the 93.
94 and up has a passenger airbag, the speedometer gauge on the 94 is different. It doesn't have all the smaller "tics" between the main rpm numbers. And I think the 95 is the one with the glass sunroof. Also the suspension stuff mentioned above me.
This is what i remember offhand.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 02:07 AM
  #7  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Competition yellow mica was only available on 93s
Chaste white was only available on 94-95

The only differences of the 94-95 are a passenger airbag, different coating on the interior panels (less likely to scratch and peel) and the gauges are slightly different looking (less hash marks) and the pacakges are a bit different (R1 vs. R2, PEP vs touring etc)

On tourings in red or tan, the door panels and headliner and other parts are black instead of the aforementioned colors - looks better because everything is not tan/red , just the seats and carpet

There is not a real noticable advantage over owning a 94-95
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 02:19 AM
  #8  
fd0's Avatar
fd0
formerly chillin_rx7_guy
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: WA
insurance is higher on a '93 and banks will finance way more on a '94-'95
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 02:24 AM
  #9  
Snook's Avatar
Tony Stewart Killer.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 4
From: London
A 94 is a TOTALLY better overall car. **** that's the only reason I sold my 93 because that car was sweeeeeeet.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 02:38 AM
  #10  
SiKoPaThX's Avatar
Porque tan serio?
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Originally Posted by chris7777777
And I think the 95 is the one with the glass sunroof. Also the suspension stuff mentioned above me.
This is what i remember offhand.
94's have the glass sunroof as well. Metal sunroof- Sun roof. Glass- Moon roof

93- Sunroof
94-95- Moonroof
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #11  
Merciless's Avatar
The Love Below!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 0
From: NW of Chicago, IL
i know for sure, the air pump relay on 94+ is twice as big
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 08:20 AM
  #12  
particleeffect's Avatar
omgwtfposlol
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Orange City, FL
Originally Posted by L8NightDrifter
ive heard froma few ppl on this forum that 93's are crappier than 94 and up.
i have a 93 dammit.

is there any difference between the two besides interior panels? if so please list the differences.
shouldn't you already know? considering that you already have an FD and are looking for another one. considering you said this in another post;

Originally Posted by L8NightDrifter
well sorry to burst your bubble, but i do own a FD and plan to buy another. thanx for your concern i will enjoy my car more knowing its bothering you.. and you need to f ing grow up loser, your the one continuously posting just to talk sh*t ... so go listen to your fackin celine dione or prince and calm the f down you overstressed loser. and i hope this doesnt make you decide to stop praying for me...
in this gem of a thread - https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=351628
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 02:17 PM
  #13  
Brick's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
I own 2 x 94's and owned a 93 before that. I would recommend the 94/95 models over the 93's. From a performance standpoint they are identical. From a fit and finish standpoint, the 94/95's are better. For example, the 94's dash can sustain normal wear and tear without flaking/chipping like the 93's. The glove compartment doesn't need adjustment every 6 months to keep from popping open. Things just seem a little more refined on the 94s & 95s. Also, I would highly recommend the versions without the sunroof, regardless of year. They seem much more rigid and fewer "creaks" develop as they age.

Keep in mind, the 93's cost around $36 K when they were first released...I believe the price went up to approx. $43K in 94 and 95. They had to make some changes to justify the price increase.

- J
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #14  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
I've owned and driven both 93s and 94s.

A nice 93 is as nice of car as a 94, the problem is that a 93 has more chance to have certain problems than a 94+. The interior panel material is not different, it has a different texture.

There are actually a TON of small changes to in 94, many of them are cost saving changes.

Simple little stuff,
the intake elbow is black on a 94+ car
The strut braces don't have a hiem joint,
the lower rear control arms are cast not forged,
the intake manifold bolts are not chromed,
the rear license plate light has two little covers, those covers are held in place with 2 screws each on 93s and 1 screw on a 94+.

Everyone knows the rear subframe is different, but a 93+ could be modified easily to mimick the extra brace without removing it from the car.

The rumor about the wheels is not true, the 94+ wheels crack, I've seen it. I've seen original wheels off a 95 that are the "cracking" type.

On a positive note, some things most people would never know/see and I'm sure there are more. 94+ cars have a little piece of styrofoam on the door panel that mates up with a metal bracket with styrofoam on the door that braces the door panel.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #15  
InsaneGideon's Avatar
Still on 1st engine
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Jeff, have you ever noticed if/why the '95 front brake calipers have a different part number and price here?:

http://www.mazdatrix.com/j-1brake.htm


Oh and everyone forgot the all-important driverside window auto-roll-down oh the 94+'s.

Last edited by InsaneGideon; Oct 8, 2004 at 11:41 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2004 | 12:21 AM
  #16  
AgentSpeed's Avatar
BNR built motor and twins
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: 2 hours drive from sanity
Originally Posted by SiKoPaThX
94's have the glass sunroof as well. Metal sunroof- Sun roof. Glass- Moon roof

93- Sunroof
94-95- Moonroof

My white 94 has a Sun roof.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2004 | 01:52 AM
  #17  
oneflytrini's Avatar
Stabbed by a pen
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 2
From: Tamarac, Florida
Ive never seen anyone post about the different defogger vents for the 94+ vehicles. The 93's seem to have 3 pieces, two long vents, with a small center piece to connect them. While the 94's+ have only two long pieces. Its those little vents right behind the front windshield.

ALI
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2004 | 02:08 AM
  #18  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by turbojeff
I've owned and driven both 93s and 94s.

A nice 93 is as nice of car as a 94, the problem is that a 93 has more chance to have certain problems than a 94+. The interior panel material is not different, it has a different texture.

There are actually a TON of small changes to in 94, many of them are cost saving changes.

Simple little stuff,
the intake elbow is black on a 94+ car
The strut braces don't have a hiem joint,
the lower rear control arms are cast not forged,
the intake manifold bolts are not chromed,
the rear license plate light has two little covers, those covers are held in place with 2 screws each on 93s and 1 screw on a 94+.

Everyone knows the rear subframe is different, but a 93+ could be modified easily to mimick the extra brace without removing it from the car.

The rumor about the wheels is not true, the 94+ wheels crack, I've seen it. I've seen original wheels off a 95 that are the "cracking" type.

On a positive note, some things most people would never know/see and I'm sure there are more. 94+ cars have a little piece of styrofoam on the door panel that mates up with a metal bracket with styrofoam on the door that braces the door panel.
wow jeff im amazed at this detail of the deepest detail of rx7s!! my intake manifold bolts are chromed.. loloOMG!! harharhahr

thanks for the detailed info. about subtlies i wouldnt notice
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #19  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Originally Posted by Rx-7Addict
wow jeff im amazed at this detail of the deepest detail of rx7s!! my intake manifold bolts are chromed.. loloOMG!! harharhahr

thanks for the detailed info. about subtlies i wouldnt notice
Is yours a 94? Probably has a motor in it out of a 93.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2004 | 11:42 AM
  #20  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Talk about learning something every day...

I knew that they eliminated the heim joint in the strut tower bar, but thought that it was a '96+ change since I've only seen it in Hyper Rev and other Japanese magazines. I never noticed that my friend's R2 had no heim joint until you mentioned that.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #21  
salamander's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Calgary AB
Here are some differences that I have read about in books or other websites but have not seen in this thread:
In 94+'s:
The front bumps stops are longer and those in the back were changed from rubber to urethane.
The EGR valve changed from being mechanically operated to being electronic. The PowerFC does not operate a 94+ EGR valve.
Fog lamps went from yellow to white.
Map pockets were added to the back of the seats.
The Popular Equipment Group became a new model and the touring was dropped (in 1995).
The 1995 ABS unit is lighter and more compact and the suspension settings were revamped (softened) again.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
Jul 17, 2019 02:20 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
$lacker
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
8
Feb 13, 2016 05:26 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.