3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Compression Results: Someone Please Interpret

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-02, 04:12 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
MontegoRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Compression Results: Someone Please Interpret

Here are the results of my compression test. How does it look?
Old 03-03-02, 04:46 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
Chaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's hard to tell from those pictures but it looks like your compression is low (near 5). The minumum you want is 6 kg/cm2.
Old 03-03-02, 06:08 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Nathan Kwok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Looks like one rotor in the mid 4s and the other in the high 4s. Definitely very low, does the car still run? If it seems to run ok, the test may have been done incorrectly, because with compression that low it should run very poorly if at all. The good news is the pulses are very even and the difference between rotors is pretty small, so you may need a second opinion here.
Old 03-03-02, 06:10 PM
  #4  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
MontegoRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, they are around 5. What is the new compression level? Should I be looking to rebuild the engine soon?
Old 03-03-02, 06:15 PM
  #5  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
MontegoRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, the car runs fine. Only time it struggles is once in a long time when It is started. It will start and then stall imediatly. That is only about once every 30 times though. Other than that, it runs well. The idle was a little rough when I got it, but after the computer and midpipe, it smoothed out a lot. Maybe I will take it to the mazda dealer for another test.
Old 03-03-02, 07:04 PM
  #6  
Full Member

 
whitekingsnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: woodstock,Ga
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Squirt some oil into the bottom plug hole and then turn the pwr steering pulley to mix it in and then do it again.

Are you using the top plug hole, if not then do.

Later..Scott
Old 03-03-02, 07:31 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The 'Nati, Ohio
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming that the test was done at 250 RPM than they look a bit low.

New engines should be in the 8-9s...

Mazda minimum is 6 kg/cm^2 @ 250. If the test was done lower or higher...you have to compensate.

Later,
Patrick
Old 03-03-02, 07:39 PM
  #8  
Weird Cat Man

 
Wargasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: A pale blue dot
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've tested several cars with my tester and I'd say that those readings are low.

Either the engine is just old and tired, or maybe your tester isn't reading right or you are losing pressure somewhere in your testing.

Key points:

- make sure you hold the throttle all the way down
- make sure you have decently peppy battery
- make sure the hose for the tester isn't leaking anywhere and it screwed in snugly (hand tight with a rubber O-ring is sufficient)
- for the "most valid" results, the engine should be warm. You can still get an idea on a cold engine, but that's not how Mazda likes you to do the test.
- does your tester's needly move smoothly?
- I know this sounds like a bitch, but if you have an air tank and a regulator, you could double check the calibration of it.


How many miles are on the engine? If it's up over the 100,000 range, I'd be more likely to just say "it's old". If it's like 50,000 miles, I'd suspect the tester or methods are flawed.

Brian
Old 03-03-02, 07:46 PM
  #9  
Weird Cat Man

 
Wargasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: A pale blue dot
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Just another note, I know that the Mazda book claims that a perfectly running [3] should be about 8+ on this test, but I've never seen one get that... The same car can vary by at least one whole point from day to day or as the exact conditions change.

I've tested my 87 TII a bunch of times, and sometimes the compression is higher or lower than others...

People also say that a ported motor will score a touch lower, but I don't have too much evidence one way or the other on this myself...

Brian
Old 03-03-02, 07:51 PM
  #10  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
MontegoRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was actually not the one who did the test. One of the local rotary shops around me did it. Where could I get a compression testor so that I can do the test myself? The car has 52,000 miles, so I want to double check it. Please let me know where to get a compression tester. Is there a special kind I will need to get or will the same one for a piston engine work on a rotary.
Old 03-03-02, 08:21 PM
  #11  
Full Member

 
Chaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the testers are pretty expensive. I would just recommend taking it to another rotary specialist if that's at all possible. I know the tests are a little pricey but it's better than spending the money on a new engine if you don't need to. Since you indicated that the original test was done by a specialist I would hope that they knew how to run the test correctly. Maybe you could talk to them and see if they'll re-test it at no cost so you can compare the two. Good luck and let us know what you find out.
Old 03-03-02, 09:02 PM
  #12  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as far as your rebuild question....

you could drive it til it goes out...which it will eventually...or you could do the rebuild soon with a streetport as motivation and NOT have to replace the housings and the ROTORS especially...if you do it now rather than after you crap a seal out your exhaust you will save a couple grand in parts.

good luck

j

trust me..lol...I drove on low compression and fucked up a housing..cost me dough that could have paid for my radiator upgrade.
Old 03-03-02, 09:34 PM
  #13  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
MontegoRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So i could do a partial rebuild? Like just have then replace the seals? How much would that cost, and would that bring the compression back up to 8 or 9?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
General Rotary Tech Support
28
11-10-23 11:08 AM
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
08-06-17 01:41 PM
93FD510
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
10-01-15 02:00 PM



Quick Reply: Compression Results: Someone Please Interpret



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.