3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Chatter sound from turbos near 3k rpm?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-17, 02:09 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Chatter sound from turbos near 3k rpm?

I'm getting a strange chatter / vibration sound that seams to be coming from the turbos. The sound is similar to a thick piece of paper hitting a fan blade. It lasts about 2 seconds when it happens, it's loud, and occurs about 50% of the time in 1st or 2nd gear between 2500 and 3000 rpms. I have also reproduced it while parked in neutral and revving, but it's not consistent. I've only had the car a few months, but it's made this sound the entire time.

The car has 99 spec sequential twins, highflow cat / air-pump, full supporting mods for ~330whp twins setup (ignition, fuel, cooling, etc), PFC.

The car is running fine otherwise, although I am getting a boost drop off around 6500 rpms that I haven't been able to solve (~14psi down to 10psi from 6500 to 7500 rpms). It may be related, but who knows.

Has anyone had this problem or have any ideas what it could be?

Thanks!
Old 06-04-17, 06:38 PM
  #2  
(Terraplane)

 
TRRAPLN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arizona desert, where the terraplanes roam.
Posts: 345
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
This?

♫Fluttering Wastegates♫...muttering monster.
Old 06-05-17, 09:41 AM
  #3  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
First thing I would do is pull off the compressor inlet pipes and feel how much shaft play the turbos have. If play is excessive, the compressor wheels could be contacting the housings. The biggest reason why the 93-95 and 99 turbos fail is running higher than stock boost. They have outdated 270 degree thrust bearings and small shafts which cannot withstand the loads of elevated boost for long. If the turbos feel tight I would start looking for a leaking charge relief valve or other hose in the vicinity. Does the car boost fine otherwise?
Old 06-05-17, 02:30 PM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
First thing I would do is pull off the compressor inlet pipes and feel how much shaft play the turbos have. If play is excessive, the compressor wheels could be contacting the housings. The biggest reason why the 93-95 and 99 turbos fail is running higher than stock boost. They have outdated 270 degree thrust bearings and small shafts which cannot withstand the loads of elevated boost for long. If the turbos feel tight I would start looking for a leaking charge relief valve or other hose in the vicinity. Does the car boost fine otherwise?
Thanks for he reply, I'll check the shaft play and the charge relief valve.

The turbos seem to build boost fine, transition fine, and and not make any noises other that what i described. No oil leaks either. But, there's a significant drop off of boost after 6.5 k rpms. It drops from 13-14lbs down to 10 almost instantly.
Old 06-05-17, 02:31 PM
  #5  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
You should be able to hold 13-14lbs past 6500. Could be something leaking or in the boost control setup/tune.
Old 06-05-17, 03:10 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
You should be able to hold 13-14lbs past 6500. Could be something leaking or in the boost control setup/tune.
Yeah, it doesn't make sense... Something fishy is going on. I'll start to strip everything down and see what I can find. It's funny because my last 3 fds over 15 years were single turbos, and the whole time I really wanted a well sorted seq FD. Now I have one, and I just want a simple single turbo .
Old 06-06-17, 01:34 PM
  #7  
ArmitageFD3S

iTrader: (13)
 
ArmitageGVR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 2,238
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
I can't help but wonder if it's not airpump related. Try unplugging the electrical connector to the airpump that engages the clutch and see if the sound is still there?
Old 06-06-17, 08:05 PM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by ArmitageGVR4
I can't help but wonder if it's not airpump related. Try unplugging the electrical connector to the airpump that engages the clutch and see if the sound is still there?
It's not a bad suggestion, ill check the airpump too. But, the couple of times that it happened while I was under the hood revving with the throttle cable, it seemed to be coming from the turbo area. I could have misheard it though. Thanks.
Old 06-07-17, 10:02 PM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
I took a look at the turbos more closely; I don't like what I'm seeing, but I'm also not sure what's normal with these suckers. My last 3 FDs had single turbos. Please let me know what you think.

Primary turbo:
-- No Oil
-- No in/out shaft play
-- Some side-to-side shaft play. Not sure what's normal, but the blades touch the housing when pressed. There's some marking on the tips of the blades, but no chips. There's some marks on the inner housing surface as well.

Secondary turbo:
-- Oil on the compressor housing, doesn't appear to be coming from the inlet or drain pipe. Appears to be coming from the back of the housing where it mates to the body.
-- No in/out shaft play
-- Some side-to-side shaft play, same concerns as primary.

Primary turbo Pics (note marks on blade and inner housing surface marks) -





Secondary turbo pics (note the oil leak, possible blade wear, and inner housing markings) -

Old 06-09-17, 02:43 PM
  #10  
Time or Money, Pick one

iTrader: (37)
 
silverTRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Torrance, ca.
Posts: 3,353
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
Some side to side shaft play is normal but the wheel should not come in contact with the housing.
Old 06-09-17, 09:16 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
CarbonR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 493
Received 29 Likes on 11 Posts
Agree with Mike, compressor wheel should not be contacting housing, which might be the sound you are hearing. I'd stop driving the car to see if the turbos can be salvaged with a rebuild. Hopefully the clearance/wear isn't too far off nominal.

Originally Posted by silverTRD
Some side to side shaft play is normal but the wheel should not come in contact with the housing.
Old 06-09-17, 10:19 PM
  #12  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Thanks guys... I agree, they are shot. I started pulling them tonight, got through the DP, and now letting the turbo nuts soak in pb blaster overnight. I'll get them off tomorrow and inspect them more closely.

... Going with a set of BNRs.
Old 06-11-17, 10:20 AM
  #13  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Pulled the turbos and again confirmed the excessive shaft play (both turbos hit the housing liner). I don't know the history of the car, but it's high boost setting was 1 bar. I suspect that has something to do with it.

The good news is that the hotside looks great, so they should make a great set of bnrs.





Also noticed that someone used some orange RTV to mate the comp housing on the primary turbo. Seems like a pretty stupid idea to me - a small it of RTV hitting a turbine at 100k + rpm would not go well...

Old 08-13-17, 09:58 AM
  #14  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Quick update -

Got the bnrs in this weekend and there's no more chattering sound. So, I'm guessing that the chatter I saw on the comp housings was to blame.
Old 08-14-17, 08:23 AM
  #15  
Thrashing your Roy score!


iTrader: (19)
 
laujesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,579
Received 66 Likes on 12 Posts
Sorry I saw this late but the compressor wheel scraping the side of the abradable coated compressor housing is a GOOD THING. Matter of fact it is the entire point behind the N3G1 "99" turbos and why they spool faster. The newer they are the more they bind up, when brand new you can hardly turn them.

Also 1 Bar is stock boost pressure for N3G1's.

Not saying these turbos were not bad for another reason but the conventional wisdom posted above does not in any way apply to these turbos.

Last edited by laujesse; 08-14-17 at 08:27 AM.
Old 08-14-17, 09:13 AM
  #16  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by laujesse
Sorry I saw this late but the compressor wheel scraping the side of the abradable coated compressor housing is a GOOD THING. Matter of fact it is the entire point behind the N3G1 "99" turbos and why they spool faster. The newer they are the more they bind up, when brand new you can hardly turn them.

Also 1 Bar is stock boost pressure for N3G1's.

Not saying these turbos were not bad for another reason but the conventional wisdom posted above does not in any way apply to these turbos.
Thanks for the input, but I find both of these statements hard to believe.

Regardless how they feel new, the blades shouldn't touch anything while spinning. The lining may reduce the clearance and improve efficiency, but I doubt that its meant to make any contract with the blades.

Also, it's my understanding that these turbos are built for 11-12 psi at most. Sustained 1 bar of boost on 99 twins will likely burn them out, specifically the bearings. Given the shaft play and oil leakage from the compressor, I suspect that's exactly what happened.
Old 08-14-17, 03:29 PM
  #17  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
Those turbos have definitely been opened by someone, there are white alignment marks on the turbine housings, some yellow paint on the primary, and that mystery orange RTV.

The 99s do have nylon abradeable seals around the compressor wheels, they are designed to be slightly oversized and the spinning compressor wheel rubs into the nylon, making for a near-perfect fit and improving efficiency. The aluminum compressor wheel will easily eat into the nylon.

That said, I don't think it touching slightly or anything is necessarily the root of the problem, it's the fact that someone in the past has pulled these turbos apart and didn't reassemble them properly. Could also be some loose orange RTV in there making the noise.

Most likely those turbos could be saved, it would be worth sending them to Bryan at BNR to go through them and clean/assemble/test them. Could be a good set of turbos for someone.

Dale
Old 08-14-17, 05:20 PM
  #18  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Thanks for chiming in. I'll concede that they are designed to rub, but it just to defies common sense to me. Having anything touch a compressor blade at 100k + rpms and sending nylon shavings into the intake track just seems nuts to me.

That being said, there was a few mm of clearance on this set, and the shaft play was enough to touch the walls easily. Also, the marks were not symmetric. Between the play, the oil, the noise, the lack of boost above 7k, and the rtv, these suckers were shot. In the end, I can only conclude that the sound was exactly what it sounded like; the compressor blades hitting.

I used the turbos as a core for my bnrs since the hotside components were in perfect shape.
Old 08-14-17, 05:27 PM
  #19  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
A few pics of the bnrs (hard lines got bent shipping, but they straightened out no prob) -




Old 08-14-17, 05:31 PM
  #20  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
More...



Old 08-14-17, 05:46 PM
  #21  
Thrashing your Roy score!


iTrader: (19)
 
laujesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,579
Received 66 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by moehler
Thanks for the input, but I find both of these statements hard to believe.

Regardless how they feel new, the blades shouldn't touch anything while spinning. The lining may reduce the clearance and improve efficiency, but I doubt that its meant to make any contract with the blades.

Also, it's my understanding that these turbos are built for 11-12 psi at most. Sustained 1 bar of boost on 99 twins will likely burn them out, specifically the bearings. Given the shaft play and oil leakage from the compressor, I suspect that's exactly what happened.


It is a statement of fact not a debatable opinion.

To qualify that statement I have sold over 100 of these N3G1 turbos on this forum over the years, several of them new, and personally ran them in 4 separate FD's since 2004.

Like Dale said your specific primary turbo looks very questionable for several reasons none of which are the rubbing.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 AM.