3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

13BRE or 13BREW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
sleeper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 10
From: Melbourne FL/San Antonio TX/Okinawa Japan
13BRE or 13BREW

ok.. this has probably been asked.. but i couldnt find it..
ran across a screaming deal with someone here locally..

would you get:

13B RE half bridge ported, NEW S5 rotor housings, 3mm seals, 3rd gen manifold custom built to fit done by rx7.com just the short block, upper&lower intake manifolds. has not been installed since build.

or

13B REW bone stock complete swap with efini turbos, ecu, wiring harness, 5 speed trans 280hp. approx 48,xxx miles


they both are the same price..
i want to buy the 13b re but my daily driver is almost dead. and i need to get the car on the road.

thanks in advance for your oppinions
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
For a street car, I'd go with the bone stock REW (correct) motor. You don't want a half bridge, custom intake mani setup for a street car unless you're pretty hardcore, definitely not for reliable transportation/daily driver use.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #3  
Davin's Avatar
Back door, no babies...
Veteran: Navy
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 4
From: LA, DC & Philly
the rew hands down!
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #4  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
The RE actually has bigger intake ports stock but both can untimately be opened up to about the same. The main benefit to the re motor is the better flowing intake manifolds, but then you have the issue of the throttle cam being on the wrong side and no provision to mount the idle air control valve.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #5  
sleeper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 10
From: Melbourne FL/San Antonio TX/Okinawa Japan
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
The RE actually has bigger intake ports stock but both can untimately be opened up to about the same. The main benefit to the re motor is the better flowing intake manifolds, but then you have the issue of the throttle cam being on the wrong side and no provision to mount the idle air control valve.
i did not know about teh idle air control valve thanks for that info.

goodfella, the car will eventually go pretty hardcore..(once i learn more about them. i still have tons of research to do..)

sorry about just asking everyone this info that took awhile for everyone to obtain. but these deals will be gone by sunday and i dont wanna pass something up that i will regret.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #6  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
You don't have to run the iac, just car won't idle as well when cold.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #7  
sleeper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 10
From: Melbourne FL/San Antonio TX/Okinawa Japan
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
You don't have to run the iac, just car won't idle as well when cold.
thanks for your input.. i found this out with a sr20det blacktop i built. i got to 383rwhp & 356ftlbs and sold the s14 it was in to buy a FD and never looked back
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:02 PM
  #8  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
what's the point of a 13B-RE with S5 housings? S5 ports are smaller than the 13B-REWs ports, the 13B-REs ports are larger than the 13B-REWs ports. At that point, you'd be better off with the 13B-REW than the 13B-RE with S5 housings.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #9  
camocarl's Avatar
-------------------
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh
Id def. go with the REW just for driveablity and reliablity, the half bridge will require a lot more attention and most likelyy will not last as long as the REW.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #10  
sleeper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 10
From: Melbourne FL/San Antonio TX/Okinawa Japan
Originally Posted by 93VRTouring
what's the point of a 13B-RE with S5 housings? S5 ports are smaller than the 13B-REWs ports, the 13B-REs ports are larger than the 13B-REWs ports. At that point, you'd be better off with the 13B-REW than the 13B-RE with S5 housings.
i should correct myself..
the ousings arent new..
they were new then got a big port job. i have looked at alot of ports on rotor housings. i have even bought a used stock housing and sent it in to be ported just to see how much bigger it gets..(may be stupid but its helping me understand the motor more)
so they will flow well beyond the capabilities of the stock REW

also i just found out.. the rotors are high compression.
so the re motor will either put out crazy power when it gets tuned!!
or it will blow up.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #11  
Master_Tao's Avatar
The Dude
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Dayton,Oh
isn't it a pain to get a RE into a fd? aren't the engine mounts the same as the FC?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #12  
sleeper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 10
From: Melbourne FL/San Antonio TX/Okinawa Japan
Originally Posted by Master_Tao
isn't it a pain to get a RE into a fd? aren't the engine mounts the same as the FC?
from my research, yes Master_Tao however i found mounts that would bolt right up. also i am having a custom sub frame built so it would be kinda easy for me to tell the fabricator to have it be able to go on a re motor instead of a rew..( but it would make his job suck)
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #13  
mirabile's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Ambler,PA
+130 on the REW. Sounds like the much more reliable option.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:55 PM
  #14  
sleeper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 10
From: Melbourne FL/San Antonio TX/Okinawa Japan
cool. thanks guys.. i am gonna get the rew..
sorry for just asking these questions. i just havent had time to research the re and i have to buy one by sunday or they will both be gone. i know you all have done tons of research trying to find the best set ups for your own taste. And i appreciate you shairing your opinions with me.
thanks again.
Kc
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 11:26 PM
  #15  
ericgrau's Avatar
Clean.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Isn't the "280HP" on the REW with Effini turbos actually ~305-315HP? 280HP is the unofficial limit in Japan. As I hear Mazda only stated 280HP to stay kosher, while the 0-60 dropped from something like 5.4s to 5.0s (vs. the original 255HP FD). Not all of that added HP is the turbo, though. Some is the exhaust, etc.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #16  
fd_neal's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
I wouldnt touch a 3mm motor, so one more vote for the REW
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 05:51 AM
  #17  
s-thetikz's Avatar
4 rotor 964 lol
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: SoCA/ MA
13B-RE . much better engine. my mechanic says so :P
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #18  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Wink

Originally Posted by s-thetikz
13B-RE . much better engine. my mechanic says so :P
Sounds to me like your mechanic made a decision in a vacuum. It may have bigger intake runners etc, but how many guys who want to make big power ditch their REW for an RE? Not too many. There is no point to running that motor over the REW. Plus, a bridgeported, race built motor is a horrible choice for the thread starter in my opinion.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 09:22 AM
  #19  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by sleeper7
also i just found out.. the rotors are high compression.
so the re motor will either put out crazy power when it gets tuned!!
or it will blow up.
Just out of curiosity - was that (higher compression) meant for a NA engine?

Dave
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 05:42 PM
  #20  
s-thetikz's Avatar
4 rotor 964 lol
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: SoCA/ MA
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Sounds to me like your mechanic made a decision in a vacuum. It may have bigger intake runners etc, but how many guys who want to make big power ditch their REW for an RE? Not too many. There is no point to running that motor over the REW. Plus, a bridgeported, race built motor is a horrible choice for the thread starter in my opinion.
I forget the details of him explaining to me, but he's the person that did all of the work on the BRS Pink Widebody FD setting it up for Time Attack and D1. I also recall him telling me about the size of the side ports ? (forget the correct terminology right now) is significantly bigger than on the REW (stock to stock comparison). And that's why he pulled the REW out of the BRS FD and stuck in the RE. I'll ask him again once I have the chance.

But the jist I got from it is that they can simply withstand more beating than the REW.

I do agree with you though; a built motor (which is what you would want to do with an RE) is certainly not suitable for the regular street driven FD.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #21  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by DaveW
Just out of curiosity - was that (higher compression) meant for a NA engine?

Dave
Yup, 9.7:1 rotors out of the n/a fc I believe.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #22  
sleeper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 10
From: Melbourne FL/San Antonio TX/Okinawa Japan
yes goodfella thats exactly what they are.

i bought the REW complete swap today. it will sit here until i have the money to paint my car. (dam state wont send me my income tax refund check yet!! i got the federal just waitin on the stupid utah government) when i get it painted i will throw it in and go from there.
i just converted this car to RHD.. it was a little bit of a bitch but not near as bad as everyone said it would be..
i will post up a thread with pics of it. soon
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 02:05 AM
  #23  
fd_neal's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by sleeper7
yes goodfella thats exactly what they are.

i just converted this car to RHD.. it was a little bit of a bitch but not near as bad as everyone said it would be..
i will post up a thread with pics of it. soon

Am i reading this right... converted a north american left hand drive car to right hand drive? why?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rx2333
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Dec 5, 2004 12:14 PM
AREITU
Old School and Other Rotary
2
Jul 3, 2002 05:51 PM
rjuge
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
Mar 21, 2002 06:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.