3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

Coolant Fan Engagement Temp not Consistent with Temp Reading

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-22, 10:30 PM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
ndinunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 103
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Coolant Fan Engagement Temp not Consistent with Temp Reading

Hey all, I just installed an aftermarket water temp gauge in my FD. After the reading I did, I decided to go the route of splicing into the TB coolant line with a tee.

I have read that the temperature readings in this location can sometimes have a tendency to read on the low side. I understand that the stock cooling fans come on the low speed mode at 226F (dependent on electrical load). Today after I shut my car off after the first drive with the new gauge, the temp was at about 180ish. It slowly crept up, and with the key still in accessory mode, I noticed my cooling fans come on at about 187 as indicated by my gauge. My parking lights were on at this time, if it’s worth mentioning.

I can’t imagine that the difference in location between the stock sensor and mine would account for THAT drastic of a temperature differential.

The car is also mostly stock, it has an aluminum rad, aluminum ast and a catless downpipe. To my knowledge, it is still on the stock FD thermo switch.

Can anyone offer any sort of insight on this? I suppose I could remove the probe, and heat some water, check it with a known good thermometer and compare the results to the gauge probe just to rule out that it’s not way off in terms of calibration.

Any input is greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
Old 05-25-22, 11:40 PM
  #2  
half ass 2 or whole ass 1

iTrader: (114)
 
cr-rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: okinawa to tampa
Posts: 3,425
Received 480 Likes on 350 Posts
The thing about adding gauges to monitor things your weren't previously monitoring is this exact scenario here. If your car is not overheating or doing anything it shouldn't be doing then continue to live your life as you were before the gauge install.

Everyone starts to think there's something wrong now that they can see numbers. Ignore it. Its fine. With the car not running, water temp and what its doing is irrelevant anyway.
Old 05-26-22, 03:54 AM
  #3  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,023
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
If the engine wasn’t running, coolant wasn’t circulating. I might just suspect heat-soak from the engine affecting the thermoswitch. The resolution and speed of both are probably different too.
Have you checked it from cold start?

Also, my gauge sensor is still mounted in that hose and has always been really close to what I see on my PFC commander. Actually sometimes the gauge seems to react just a little quicker.
Old 05-26-22, 05:25 AM
  #4  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
ndinunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 103
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by cr-rex
The thing about adding gauges to monitor things your weren't previously monitoring is this exact scenario here. If your car is not overheating or doing anything it shouldn't be doing then continue to live your life as you were before the gauge install.

Everyone starts to think there's something wrong now that they can see numbers. Ignore it. Its fine. With the car not running, water temp and what its doing is irrelevant anyway.
Not necessarily that I think something is wrong with the car or how it’s running, I’m just trying to confirm the accuracy of my gauge. Having a reliable way to monitor temps in these cars is important in my opinion, it would be pointless to install a gauge if i’m just going to ignore it. But thanks for the input
Old 05-26-22, 05:32 AM
  #5  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
ndinunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 103
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
If the engine wasn’t running, coolant wasn’t circulating. I might just suspect heat-soak from the engine affecting the thermoswitch. The resolution and speed of both are probably different too.
Have you checked it from cold start?

Also, my gauge sensor is still mounted in that hose and has always been really close to what I see on my PFC commander. Actually sometimes the gauge seems to react just a little quicker.
That was my initial thought too, but I had basically just shut the car down, then the fan came on. I didn’t think that the location of the coolant the thermo switch is measuring would see a temp spike so quickly, but I suppose it’s possible, and since the coolant isn’t circulating, whatever is in the TB hose wouldn’t really heat soak much after shut down.

The lowest temperature the gauge indicates is 100F, so from dead cold i saw the temp slowly creep up, but I didn’t let the car idle long enough for the fans to kick on. That’ll be my next test.

While cruising and idling in traffic, I was seeing temperatures between 165 and 185F with 68F ambient temps

Old 05-26-22, 06:13 AM
  #6  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,023
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
If it helps, your cruising/driving temps seem appropriate and what I’d expect.

Eventually, if you plan to stay on the stock ECU I would consider replacing the FD thermoswitch with the S5 FC version. It lowers the threshold for the fans from something like 105 C. to 96 C.
Its a little fiddly to get to on the back of the t-stat housing but worthwhile IMO.
Old 05-26-22, 06:15 AM
  #7  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
ndinunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 103
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
If it helps, your cruising/driving temps seem appropriate and what I’d expect.

Eventually, if you plan to stay on the stock ECU I would consider replacing the FD thermoswitch with the S5 FC version. It lowers the threshold for the fans from something like 105 C. to 96 C.
Its a little fiddly to get to on the back of the t-stat housing but worthwhile IMO.
Thanks for the advice. I plan to eventually upgrade the ecu, but I’m not sure when i’ll get around to that. Taking my time with modifying it. An FC thermo switch will most likely be one of the next things i do with the car in the meantime
Old 05-26-22, 06:30 AM
  #8  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,023
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
FWIW I think it’s great that as a newer owner one of the first things you did was to add the temp gauge rather than some silly bling or ill-advised performance mods. And it sounds like you’ve been doing your reading.

But that said I get where cr-rex was coming from. Sometimes new owners get overly concerned with minutiae and forget to enjoy the car. It’s been about 20 years but speaking from experience.

Last edited by Sgtblue; 05-26-22 at 06:33 AM.
Old 05-26-22, 07:03 AM
  #9  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
ndinunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 103
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
That's definitely not untrue hahaha. I just want to make sure the car is running as well as it could be, and thankfully it's been pretty reliable. I would mainly like to be able to monitor temps during spirited driving, so I can let the car cool when it needs to and avoid accidentally pushing it too hard. If there is some sort of "calibration error" between the temp my gauge is displaying and the temp the stock sensor is reading, I'd like to figure out what it is so that I can mentally account for it. Thanks again for all the input, I'll update the thread when I run the car from idle until the fans kick on.
Old 05-26-22, 08:37 AM
  #10  
Boilermakers!

iTrader: (157)
 
ZE Power MX6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,691
Received 359 Likes on 263 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
If the engine wasn’t running, coolant wasn’t circulating. I might just suspect heat-soak from the engine affecting the thermoswitch. The resolution and speed of both are probably different too.
Have you checked it from cold start?

Also, my gauge sensor is still mounted in that hose and has always been really close to what I see on my PFC commander. Actually sometimes the gauge seems to react just a little quicker.
Yup, this is totally normally after shut off, heat soaking due to lack of coolant circulation. I can see up to 110°C on my commander after shut down and the fan will run, while my coolant temp gauge on the TB line still sit at 180°F. It's a small line and without flow it is not going to react as fast as the sensor at the water housing. Temperature will drop fast if you start the car back up to get coolant moving again.
Old 05-26-22, 09:08 AM
  #11  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
ndinunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 103
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by ZE Power MX6
Yup, this is totally normally after shut off, heat soaking due to lack of coolant circulation. I can see up to 110°C on my commander after shut down and the fan will run, while my coolant temp gauge on the TB line still sit at 180°F. It's a small line and without flow it is not going to react as fast as the sensor at the water housing. Temperature will drop fast if you start the car back up to get coolant moving again.
This is pretty much exactly the answer I was looking for. I just wanted to validate that the readout on my gauge was accurate. Thanks again
Old 05-27-22, 10:11 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

iTrader: (8)
 
REnaissance_Sle7in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 330
Received 63 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by ndinunz
This is pretty much exactly the answer I was looking for. I just wanted to validate that the readout on my gauge was accurate. Thanks again
This used to make me super nervous on the Cosmo. I used to sit around and run the fans till the temp came back down every time I shut the car off haha. I still do it from time to time, just because I don't think all the vacuum lines and plastics under the hood need to be baking in all that heat....but it's not something that I'm worried about, or **** about anymore.

@cr-rex is totally right. It was something I've never monitored in any of my rotary cars...so when I saw it the first time I got crazy nervous. But like he and the others have said, it's really irrelevant after the car shuts off
Old 05-27-22, 10:40 AM
  #13  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,841
Received 2,605 Likes on 1,848 Posts
[QUOTE=REnaissance_Sle7in;12519893]This used to make me super nervous on the Cosmo. I used to sit around and run the fans till the temp came back down every time I shut the car off haha. I still do it from time to time, just because I don't think all the vacuum lines and plastics under the hood need to be baking in all that heat....but it's not something that I'm worried about, or **** about anymore./QUOTE]

i used to turn the car off, and then turn the key back on and let the turbo timer run the fan.
Old 05-27-22, 10:49 AM
  #14  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
ndinunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 103
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by REnaissance_Sle7in
But like he and the others have said, it's really irrelevant after the car shuts off
Thanks for the input! Yeah I totally get the concept of the car heat soaking after shut down. What I was trying to learn from the post was why the temp fan was coming on if my gauge only indicated 187F
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdskin
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
01-13-06 08:43 AM
roadsterdoc
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
7
01-29-04 10:34 AM
machinis
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
24
11-30-03 10:33 AM
DamonB
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
8
10-23-02 01:27 PM
LoSRx7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
10-06-02 09:57 PM



Quick Reply: Coolant Fan Engagement Temp not Consistent with Temp Reading



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.