2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Rtek7 2.1 .~VS~. Mega Squirt V3???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-09, 05:08 PM
  #1  
OneThreeRotary

Thread Starter
 
87_RX7_fc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rtek7 2.1 .~VS~. Mega Squirt V3???

So I'm on the Market for a ECU, I have landed on two choices Rtek7 v2.1 and the Mega squirt v3?

So which one is better?

Pros and cons?

(note: I'm looking for about 300whp with 720cc injectors BNR stage 3 turbo and a front mount intercooler, it that realistic with these two?)

I would love some insight from Owners of one of these two ECUs. thanks!
Old 03-13-09, 05:13 PM
  #2  
Listen to King Diamond.

iTrader: (4)
 
need RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 2,834
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Really, you're comparing 2 different animals. The Megasquirt is a full standalone and the RTek is a chip installed in the stock ECU that allows adjustments to the stock settings. I've never used either, but from the research I've done, I think the RTek would be all you need for your planned setup.
Old 03-13-09, 05:17 PM
  #3  
OneThreeRotary

Thread Starter
 
87_RX7_fc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea I know that they are different, I guess my question is... Does all the headache that goes into making the megasquirt work, worth the end result? Or would I be able to do a good amount with the easier to use Rtek?
Old 03-13-09, 05:20 PM
  #4  
Listen to King Diamond.

iTrader: (4)
 
need RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 2,834
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
If you're comfortable assembling an entire ECU yourself and tuning it all yourself, I'd probably go for the Megasquirt. It gives you full control over all engine parameters and leaves you more room to grow in the future, in case you want to get a bigger turbo or radically ported motor or something.
Old 03-13-09, 05:20 PM
  #5  
Full Member

iTrader: (2)
 
88rx7gxlturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bemidji, MN
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you don't have a local tuner that does megasquirt and don't want to take the time (lots) to learn how to do it yourself, you'll probably want to stick with the rtek.
Old 03-13-09, 07:03 PM
  #6  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 430 Likes on 263 Posts
there is way less driveability tuning for the rtek
Old 03-13-09, 09:18 PM
  #7  
`*☆*`{RX7}`*☆*`

 
MazdaRX7.ws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by arghx
there is way less driveability tuning for the rtek
Why is that arghx? Is it because the ms you can adjust timing, spark fuel and all and the rtek is based on the stock map and limited as to what you can adjust?
Old 03-13-09, 09:21 PM
  #8  
Listen to King Diamond.

iTrader: (4)
 
need RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 2,834
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaRX7.ws
Why is that arghx? Is it because the ms you can adjust timing, spark fuel and all and the rtek is based on the stock map and limited as to what you can adjust?
With the RTek, you make adjustments to the pre-existing stock maps, but with the MS you need to create all the maps from scratch.
Old 03-13-09, 09:25 PM
  #9  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 430 Likes on 263 Posts
There are a gazillion little time consuming things you have to adjust on a standalone that have no effect on power output or response
Old 03-13-09, 09:43 PM
  #10  
The Silent but Deadly Mod

iTrader: (2)
 
Roen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC/T.O.
Posts: 4,047
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
For 300 whp, I don't think you need a stage 3, a stage 1 or 2 will get you there, with less lag to boot.

For 300 whp, an Rtek will get you there for cheaper.
Old 03-14-09, 03:03 PM
  #11  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,904
Received 2,646 Likes on 1,874 Posts
the Rtek has a lot of things going its way

1. its in the car!

2. since it starts with the stock map, you just tweak it

3. stock ecu based means it wont have weird ignition/trigger issues.

the cons against the Rtek are basically that its 8 bit vs whatever the MS is, so its slower


there are lots of people who have had good results with the MS, but since its DYI there are also people with weird problems. it also doesn't do things like sequential fuel injection, it doesnt have a lot of load points, etc etc.... its also not cheap if you buy a prebuilt one.
Old 03-15-09, 10:33 AM
  #12  
OneThreeRotary

Thread Starter
 
87_RX7_fc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
okay, thank you!
Old 03-15-09, 12:59 PM
  #13  
I really Schruted it

 
RX7Tuner.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have the time to learn. MS will force you to learn info about engine management that will be valuable the rest of your life.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R.O.D
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
34
01-06-16 12:09 AM
tidanb0utch
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
11
10-07-15 07:36 AM
R.O.D
Rtek Forum
1
09-23-15 01:15 AM
TerryD
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
08-23-15 07:40 AM



Quick Reply: Rtek7 2.1 .~VS~. Mega Squirt V3???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.