2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

RPM Diffrence on AVC-R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 01:54 AM
  #1  
neevosh's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Dude Abides
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
RPM Diffrence on AVC-R

The RPM display on the AVC-R is different then the tach. At idle they're very close but the higher I rev, the more off the display shows. At around 6500 RPM the AVC-R shows about 5500 RPM. Is this a grounding or voltage problem? Or some kind of wiring problem?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 03:25 AM
  #2  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
1000 seems a bit high. but the stock tach is most lily off some. you are just comparing a 15 year old analog gauge to a brand new digital one...

the AVC is most likly right. my safc is off by around 300-400.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 07:25 PM
  #3  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Bringing this back from the dead as I have the same problem. The only thing is, I'd like to solve it. How can I get my stock tach to read correctly? Let me explain the current setup:

This is a GTUs tach(0-9k rpm) with a turbo engine and stock turbo ecu, with an AVCR wired in, coincidentally, by Neevosh. My problem is exactly the same, except it's about 400 rpms off at redline, and maybe 0-20 rpms off at idle.

I plan on going Haltech in a few months, is there any chance this will solve my problem and I should just tough it out until then? Or should I try and get the Tach calibrated now? Thanks guys!

Steve
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
No oem tachometer gurus? Ka-bump!

Steve

P.S. The AVCR is set to 4 piston mode, which I believe is the correct setting for our application.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 10:29 PM
  #5  
incendui's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, Co
I have this problem too, anyone using the turbo ecu on an s5 n/a guage cluster is going to have the tach off. I first figured it was off when I hit the rev limiter at 8600 rpms
I doubt its possible to calibrate it without modifiying the circuitry somehow, since its off by a different amount at different rpms.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 10:37 PM
  #6  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
After a bit of searching: apparently, because the aftermarket electronics tap the rear trailing coils, and the stock tach taps the CAS, there's a discrepancy between the two. But nothing I've read so far offers a solution. Not even which is more accurate(although I'm guessing the newer electronics are). I'd really like to have an accurate tach, there must be some way to fix this.

Steve
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 10:41 PM
  #7  
incendui's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, Co
I dont think the problem we're seeing has to do with the rpm being read from different sensors, rather the computer is expecting to output the signal to a tach with an 8k range rather than a 9k range. The tach in the guage cluster isnt a real tach, its just displays what the ecu tells it to.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 11:00 PM
  #8  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
That would make sense if Neevosh had a 9k tach, but he doesn't, he has the stock 8k TII tach. I don't think it's because of the difference in tachs/signals, everything I've read/been told says that there shouldn't be a problem. I think it's a problem in the tachometer unit itself. Question is, can it be fixed?

Steve
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #9  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Bump.

Steve
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #10  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by incendui
IThe tach in the guage cluster isnt a real tach, its just displays what the ecu tells it to.
That would be wrong.

The tach in the dash gets its signal from a summed signal from the trailing coils
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:25 AM
  #11  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by MtnRacer
After a bit of searching: apparently, because the aftermarket electronics tap the rear trailing coils, and the stock tach taps the CAS, there's a discrepancy between the two. But nothing I've read so far offers a solution. Not even which is more accurate(although I'm guessing the newer electronics are). I'd really like to have an accurate tach, there must be some way to fix this.

Steve
the stock tach does not tap into the CAS. It gets its signal from the trailing coils.

Only the stock ECU get's its speed from the CAS.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #12  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by Icemark
That would be wrong.

The tach in the dash gets its signal from a summed signal from the trailing coils
actually the trailings are fired on a "toggle" there is a "tach" signal that the ecu sends for every trailing event and everyother one it also sends a second "toggle" or switching signal which tells the trailing ignitor to fire t2. the 20b cosmo also works this way except its got 3 toggle signals, one for each rotor

mike
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:37 AM
  #13  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
I know nothing about the ACVR, but there are numerous wrong posts in this thread.

In your case Steve, what does the ACVR tap into to get its tach signal???

I normally have to set most aftermarket electronics (like remote starts and the like) to 6 cyl when using the trailing coil signal (which I am figuring that is what you are using). Your 4 cyl setting may be off- again though, I don’t know enough about a ACVR to tell you for sure.

The stock tach has about a +/- 500 RPM window (depending on RPM) for calibration. At 1000 RPM the stock tach is in limits if it is reading between 880-1060 RPM. At 7000 RPM, the stock tach can be reading between 6965 and 7455 RPM and still be within factory limits. In theory it is possible to increase the accuracy by building a buffer, but I have not tried to do one on the FC stock tach before.

Last edited by Icemark; Nov 21, 2003 at 11:43 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:41 AM
  #14  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by j9fd3s
actually the trailings are fired on a "toggle" there is a "tach" signal that the ecu sends for every trailing event and everyother one it also sends a second "toggle" or switching signal which tells the trailing ignitor to fire t2. the 20b cosmo also works this way except its got 3 toggle signals, one for each rotor

mike
either way, with his problem, if the ACVR and the stock tach were using that same trailing coil Y/L tach output wire, they would be getting the same signal and reading the same thing.

Which suggests that one of the two devices are not calibrated as well as the other.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 01:19 PM
  #15  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by Icemark
either way, with his problem, if the ACVR and the stock tach were using that same trailing coil Y/L tach output wire, they would be getting the same signal and reading the same thing.

Which suggests that one of the two devices are not calibrated as well as the other.
yah thats my thought, i bet money on the tach being slow/fast vs the avcr. unless the avcr gets its signal from the cas, then it could be off.

i just threw out the info for info cause we need clarification here.

mike
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dona1326cosprings7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Oct 29, 2015 06:47 AM
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
Oct 7, 2015 04:04 PM
Einheri
Single Turbo RX-7's
14
Oct 7, 2015 12:23 PM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.