2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

OMP Premixing Oil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:58 PM
  #1  
knivesm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: CALIFORNIA
OMP Premixing Oil

What type of 2 stroke oil is good when blocking off the omp. I know it 1 oz for 1 gallon but what brand oil to use?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #2  
texFCturboII's Avatar
version 2.0
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
any brand is just as good as the other.... well some is about $1.50 more expensive than other, which MUST mean it does a better job. I know Pettit racing makes a specific pre-mixing oil for our cars, but I don't know if it is actually any better since I haven't used it.... or how one would tell (BOOM! REBUILD!!)
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #3  
ericgrau's Avatar
Clean.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Any TCW certified oil is good. Even the cheap stuff usually meets TCW.

Going synthetic, etc. is just like getting synthetic motor oil: It'll survive extreme conditions better, produce less wear and keep your internals cleaner, but it costs more and the cheap stuff still works great. People often bash on synthetics because your engine will last a very long time even on the cheap stuff. Synthetics are still good for certain situations. But if you don't want to bother looking into it, just get the cheap stuff (as long as it meets TCW) and don't worry.

Btw, I think the actual standard is "TCW-13" or something.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #4  
AllMotorRotor's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Home
TCW-3 is what everyone reccomends.

2 stroke oils have certain flash points so you wan't a 2 stroke oil that doesn't have a real low flash point, such as 150-190 which I believe is for air cooled engines such as those in planes. You want above 220 or so.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 06:55 AM
  #5  
PinkRacer's Avatar
Licensed Zip Tie Mechanic
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 2
From: Halifax, NS
We use Amsoil Sabre Professional 100:1 premix oil, but mix it at a ration of 80:1. Before that, we used Yamalube 2-stroke Racing Oil, which is available through most motorcycle shops.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #6  
AllMotorRotor's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Home
I was thinking of going with amsoil 2 stroke but I need them to send my all the specs of it first.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #7  
Spectator's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: Canada
80:1 is too much imo. A lot of people here use 1 once per gallon = 128:1...I go with 100:1 in metric system. Meaning 1ml of TCW3 for 100ml of gas. I always put in 30 litres at a time so 300ml of TCW3 and I am good to go. 80:1 would make your car smoke a lot imo....and even might reduce performance since the mix is to saturated....My opinion.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #8  
AllMotorRotor's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Home
I run 1/2 oz per gallon with no performance or reliability issues so far.

My question is this. 2 stroke has a much lower flash point then your standard motor oil which can be around 400*F whicl 2 stroke can be lower then 250*F. I wonder if you would need more 2 stroke to do the same job as motor oil since it burns off quicker?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 08:06 AM
  #9  
oakback's Avatar
meh
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee
I used this stuff, and would use a smaller quart bottle to refill with the bigger bottle.




My engine died, but I'm sure it was due to the 156,000+ miles, and the frequent redlining and autocross.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #10  
PinkRacer's Avatar
Licensed Zip Tie Mechanic
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 2
From: Halifax, NS
Originally Posted by F.C.3S
80:1 is too much imo. A lot of people here use 1 once per gallon = 128:1...I go with 100:1 in metric system. Meaning 1ml of TCW3 for 100ml of gas. I always put in 30 litres at a time so 300ml of TCW3 and I am good to go. 80:1 would make your car smoke a lot imo....and even might reduce performance since the mix is to saturated....My opinion.
The car is not street driven, and is a full bridgeport. The engine is built to the limits of it's potential (N/A), so we use what our engine builder recommended.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 09:23 AM
  #11  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Originally Posted by F.C.3S
80:1 is too much imo. A lot of people here use 1 once per gallon = 128:1...I go with 100:1 in metric system. Meaning 1ml of TCW3 for 100ml of gas. I always put in 30 litres at a time so 300ml of TCW3 and I am good to go. 80:1 would make your car smoke a lot imo....and even might reduce performance since the mix is to saturated....My opinion.
Even if you're metric, you can still follow the 128 parts gas to 1 part oil ratio if you'd like, too bad no one knows the optimal blend ratio for a street car.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #12  
GOGGIN's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines
i have a 90 RX7 non turbo. i want to do 2 strok but what is the easiets way to block the OMP lines? as mine are broken i want to just block them?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #13  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
you need to find a way to prevent limp mode from happenning with your S5 ECU. If you've already taken care of that, I can't imagine a blockoff plate not being sold.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #14  
knivesm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: CALIFORNIA
http://www.2751engineering.com/fc3s_..._plates_89.htm
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #15  
GOGGIN's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines
Originally Posted by Roen
you need to find a way to prevent limp mode from happenning with your S5 ECU. If you've already taken care of that, I can't imagine a blockoff plate not being sold.
how do i do that?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 05:29 PM
  #16  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Can you drive your car without the OMP hooked up right now?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #17  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
88 cars have no electric OMP and have NO limp mode.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #18  
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Comstock Park, MI 49321
Anything TCW-3 I normally get a 16oz bottle from Walmart for $1.57 ea

and 86-88 cars dont have an electric omp so there is no limp mode due to that.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 05:56 PM
  #19  
coxxoc's Avatar
Shooting for 500
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 833
Likes: 53
From: Redmond, WA
I'm running 160:1 (10 gallons on fill add 8 ounces of 2 stroke). I used to run 128:1 (1 gallon to 1 ounce) but it would smoke like a mother at idle.

I'd heard that for racing N/A's Racing Beat reccomended 256:1 (1 gallon to 1/2 ounce) but I haven't confirmed that.

128:1 has worked good for me so far.

Josh
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #20  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Originally Posted by GOGGIN
i have a 90 RX7 non turbo. i want to do 2 strok but what is the easiets way to block the OMP lines? as mine are broken i want to just block them?
Originally Posted by HAILERS
88 cars have no electric OMP and have NO limp mode.
I thought it was an S5?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #21  
rx7-kid's Avatar
Incomplete Project
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Oroville, California
I use idimitsu premix from mazdatrix. I bought a whole box of it. and havent even went trough it yet. I mix around 1/2 punce per gallon. sometime i up a bit to about 3/4 ounce per gallon. but that just me.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #22  
GOGGIN's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines
ok but how do i do the ECU on a 90? also the car does not currently run. it crakes but wont fire. so would that cause it to do that? i can hear the compresion so that is not my problem.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #23  
RotaMan99's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
You can look at this thread here about removing the OMP on S5.

I was trying to think of a way to trick the ECU into thinking the OM Pwas still active and operating at a certain position at a preset throttle position. I just don't have a S5 to play with so I can't try it.
https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/s5-omp-removal-searchable-thread-326577/

Most of the time people just stash the OMP to the side, but my question is why? Leaving it on is best solution for factory engine.

I would also start a new thread addressing the issue you have with your engine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
Jan 9, 2018 11:19 AM
troym55
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
May 25, 2016 12:42 PM
tiger18
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Sep 3, 2015 08:27 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Sep 3, 2015 07:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.