Non turbo fuel map vs turbo fuel map?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pomona CA
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Non turbo fuel map vs turbo fuel map?
I tried looking for this in the previous threads but the search function is not working for some reason. Here is the question
What does the nonturbo fuel map look like compaired to the turbo fuel map?
I imagine that the map stops at a certian manifold pressure for the nonturbo ecu since it will not reach as high as the turbo ecu, but I've heard a couple of guys say it's damn near the same so there are no problems.
True?
What does the nonturbo fuel map look like compaired to the turbo fuel map?
I imagine that the map stops at a certian manifold pressure for the nonturbo ecu since it will not reach as high as the turbo ecu, but I've heard a couple of guys say it's damn near the same so there are no problems.
True?
#2
Rx-hippie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe that is true for non-turbo Verts as they were turbo everywhere else but US and Can. I believe you are right about the fuel maps on the US coupes. I don't belive the N/A have the same map because hire res map = more memory = more money... companys are cheap.. hehe
I'm sure Icemark will correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm sure Icemark will correct me if I'm wrong.
#3
wtf's a piston
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has been covered a million times, just do a search. My 88' vert ecu worked fine when I swapped in a 13bt in it, but I have since swapped a TII ecu in just to be safe.
#4
Passing life by
The US spec N338 ECU is out of a 88vert, it is the only NA ECU valid for proper use in a TII aplication. The system uses the PS to know when the car is under boost so it is very importain without a standalone EMS as they use a true manifold pressure. As far as the fuel curve map exsactly I do not know but I can guarenty it is higher all the time and much more on boost. There is more factors that efect the car when a TII swap application is being applyd then just the fuel map that you will not recive from any other ECU then the N338 or corosponding TII ECU
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pomona CA
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by iceblue
The US spec N338 ECU is out of a 88vert, it is the only NA ECU valid for proper use in a TII aplication. The system uses the PS to know when the car is under boost so it is very importain without a standalone EMS as they use a true manifold pressure. As far as the fuel curve map exsactly I do not know but I can guarenty it is higher all the time and much more on boost. There is more factors that efect the car when a TII swap application is being applyd then just the fuel map that you will not recive from any other ECU then the N338 or corosponding TII ECU
#7
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pomona CA
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
There are no fuel maps per se...
-Ted
-Ted
What do you mean? are all the calculations done on the fly by the computer from the sensor readings?
Trending Topics
#8
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by Curtisleeyoung
What do you mean? are all the calculations done on the fly by the computer from the sensor readings?
Thus, it's a 1:1 relationship.
Unless those Rtek guys can chime in and claim otherwise, none of the ECU reprograms prior up until a few years ago could claim a "modified fuel map".
-Ted
#10
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
And I believe it was the Rtek guys who basically determined that the TII ECU just firehoses fuel in after a certain RPM/boost pressure. Very crude.
Hell, you can get the same effect with an NA ECU and an S-AFC.
Hell, you can get the same effect with an NA ECU and an S-AFC.
#11
Passing life by
As sad as it is I have to say a SAFC is more safisticated then our damn ECU. You can actualy build a map with a wide band.
The only thing I fear abour the N/A ECU with a fuel controller is how it pulls back the timing. Members have very sucesfully ran the application with a fuel controller and wide band.
The only thing I fear abour the N/A ECU with a fuel controller is how it pulls back the timing. Members have very sucesfully ran the application with a fuel controller and wide band.
#12
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
And I believe it was the Rtek guys who basically determined that the TII ECU just firehoses fuel in after a certain RPM/boost pressure. Very crude.
Hell, you can get the same effect with an NA ECU and an S-AFC.
Hell, you can get the same effect with an NA ECU and an S-AFC.
There are really good reasons why standalones are well liked. Something about replacing early to mid 80s computer technology with something modern...
-=Russ=-
#14
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Originally Posted by Gene
I thought the best way to use a Super AFC was to use oversize injectors and then use the minus adjustement to take fuel back out...?
As sad as it is I have to say a SAFC is more safisticated then our damn ECU. You can actualy build a map with a wide band.
The only thing I fear abour the N/A ECU with a fuel controller is how it pulls back the timing. Members have very sucesfully ran the application with a fuel controller and wide band.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
befarrer
Microtech
3
08-22-15 05:52 PM