2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

na vs. tII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-03, 12:34 AM
  #1  
Rotor Head

Thread Starter
 
DC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
na vs. tII

muwahahaha

were not comparing cars here. Not just another one of those posts


I'm trying to decide between going s4TII engine in my sport with an n/a drive line...like 250 hp

or a decked out n/a engine....FRESH rebuild...Ported aluminum, flywheel, dope clutch..

What do you think i should do? Rebuild my NA or swap in a TII

Thanks ladies
Evan
Old 01-29-03, 12:43 AM
  #2  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Turbo's are fast. NA's are quick at best.

Do you want to be able to beat corvette's, or are you fine with beating down a Ford Taurus?

Boost all the way.
Old 01-29-03, 12:52 AM
  #3  
NA Powah, Every Hour!

 
RarestRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA, U S of A
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yo,


Go with the NA rebuild. I've had to go to my other hand to count all the people I know with TII's that have blown their motors. Just saw some guy detonate his FD on Saturday.

But...don't let me dissuade you. *grin*

Kevin
1989 GTUs "Takes a licking, and keeps on ticking."
Old 01-29-03, 01:02 AM
  #4  
just dont care.

iTrader: (6)
 
jacobcartmill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
NA if you want a dependable daily driver.

turboII if you want a fast second car.
Old 01-29-03, 01:03 AM
  #5  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally posted by RarestRX
"Takes a licking, and keeps on ticking."
Takes a licking by everything save a non-SHO Ford Taurus. Ask Evan about his Taurus race. He had trouble.
Old 01-29-03, 01:46 AM
  #6  
NA Powah, Every Hour!

 
RarestRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA, U S of A
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yo,


Bro, I don't care if I get beat by a Turbo PT Cruiser...which I easily will. I just was on a track and was hanging with Z06's, WRX's, FD's, and a TT 911 in the twisty bits.

*shrug*

When I left for home and was getting gas I saw a guy with an FD who just blew his motor. I passed him as he drove 55 on I-5. I was going 85.

Kevin
1989 GTUs "RX-7's are not dragsters."
Old 01-29-03, 02:12 AM
  #7  
Rotor Head

Thread Starter
 
DC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hes just kidding, i was just telling him about my night....And i never have people trying to race me and he took off i took off just to turn left into the 7-11 parking lot....Funny part was i wasn't racing and i kept up with him....

Sean just misunderstood

I could have KILLED IT like he was in reverse
Old 01-29-03, 02:16 AM
  #8  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally posted by RarestRX
Yo,


Bro, I don't care if I get beat by a Turbo PT Cruiser...which I easily will. I just was on a track and was hanging with Z06's, WRX's, FD's, and a TT 911 in the twisty bits.

*shrug*

When I left for home and was getting gas I saw a guy with an FD who just blew his motor. I passed him as he drove 55 on I-5. I was going 85.

Kevin
1989 GTUs "RX-7's are not dragsters."
I was on the track the other day and I lapped an NA before he had pegged his tach in first.
*grin*

It's like having your car, and then adding the ability to accelerate.
Old 01-29-03, 02:21 AM
  #9  
White Comet

 
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orange County
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well my NA is on par with an S4 T2 so I dont think im lagging too severly on drag capabilities. Im not building the car in that direction either so I dont mind if this is my limit.

Your dilemna does interest me in regards to using the NA driveline with the T2 motor. Im also faced with the same choice and dont know if the NA driveline will hold up.
Old 01-29-03, 02:54 AM
  #10  
Boost This!

 
bcty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nanaimo, B.C, Canada
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with a good port on the n/a you will be able to make 220-240hp.. that will be a ;loud but very fun car to drive.. especially when you wanna beat on it and not worry about detonating..
Old 01-29-03, 03:09 AM
  #11  
I HATE sleepy eyes

 
BoostedRotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For once, Im choosing NA. Here are my reasons:

The NA is far more concievable, I mean what are the chances that you will actually do the TII swap? very slim. (not cracking, just telling it like it is)Might as well start planning on something you'll see through.

Replacing the NA is WAY more affordable...and as much as I hate admitting this, TII's have a lot more **** to go wrong (especially in a swap)

This is my outlook, I love turbos, and will always have one over an NA...but i also have the luxury of being able to afford more than one car. A daily driver is a must if you own a TII and plan on doing any work to it...people can argue, but it's true...and Im a turbo supporter!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sethix
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
11-03-17 11:48 PM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 04:34 PM
MidnightOwl
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-25-15 10:24 PM



Quick Reply: na vs. tII



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.