na vs. ls integra
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: STL
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
na vs. ls integra
well some kid at school is calling me out he has an ls integra with and intake and some knock off exhaust with 180,000 miles. my n/a is stock is it worth puttin $50 up on or am i just throwing money away?
#3
throwing it away. I lost to an LS integra 5 speed when driving my 90 S5 vert. We put $20 on the race and with my best launch in my stock car(with a K&N drop in) i lost by 2 feet. His car had an intake and upgraded clutch. you will lose unless he sucks at driving.
#6
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: STL
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well hes not a very good driver as far as i can see. and i wont ask what i can do to get faster i know n/a's are more fro daily driving im in the process of getting a turbo swap now. but i donno i might do it i guess ill let you know.
Trending Topics
#8
Former FC enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Your car can beat a 2nd gen but a 3rd gen you will lose to. Assuming that both cars are running 100% and both drivers are equal.
/ thread
Go to google, type in 0-60 and select I'm Feeling Lucky. Use the database to find out if your car is faster, truth is both cars are slow as hell and thats why this thread sucks.
/ thread
Go to google, type in 0-60 and select I'm Feeling Lucky. Use the database to find out if your car is faster, truth is both cars are slow as hell and thats why this thread sucks.
#11
#12
Wish he had a running rx7
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you will have a good chance. Trying going lower on the money like 20 dollars. Why I got a quote on Ronin is because verts are heavier than a regular rx7. Now a exhaust rarely does nothing to a car especially intake. I looked up what it said and that car makes like 142 hp and 127tq and I think you might have a good chance. You may have more power but he has the better weight on you. So your choice.
Last edited by RX7freak08; 10-24-07 at 06:34 PM. Reason: correct
#13
Like I said it would be down to the wire. LS's have low end torque but you have a good chance of catching up at the end. You'd have to keep up the revs passed 5 or 6 grand the whole time to catch him
#15
oops i stand corrected....but isn't the 1st and 2nd gen Ls 1.6? KNONFS said the Si's were tougher to beat than the 3rd gen LS...if Si's are 1.6 and Ls's 1.8 then how could the Si be harder to beat?
#17
flat black fury
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no the ls's are b18b non vtecs with long geared tranny's. the si however is a b16a with vtec with a closer range tranny. only the 1st gen teg's came with the 1.6 but that was th d16zc. the ratios and power differences are why the si would be harder to beat.
#19
Well if his car still has pop up headlights, then yeah, youll win, those did have 1.6's but thats way way back.
gettin second gens had b18a, 3rd had b18b.
i doubt anyone with a first gen integra would actually race people tho....thats just silly.
#21
i raced my brother in my 1990 intergra ls he was in his 91 seven and i beat him pretty hard.
i had an intake, exhuast and an exedy stage 1 clutch.
he had a shitty exhuast, slipping clutch and non working 5th and 6th ports.
yes you will get beat just because the rx7 is heavier even though you have more hp and torque.
i had an intake, exhuast and an exedy stage 1 clutch.
he had a shitty exhuast, slipping clutch and non working 5th and 6th ports.
yes you will get beat just because the rx7 is heavier even though you have more hp and torque.