2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

misprint in FSM? (engine codes)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 12:30 PM
  #1  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
misprint in FSM? (engine codes)

so i'm doing some self diagnostic on my FC
and i tested which engine codes are brought up with the pin connector

one of them that confuses me is similar to 73 (rear secondary injector) but is missing one flash

it goes

3 long flashes
3 long flashes
3 short flashes

the FSM for code 73 is 7 long flashes, and then 3 short flashes

is the FSM wrong, or do i have another problem in the system somewhere?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #2  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
thats a 30, and a 33, not a 63 :P


EDIT: this is one of those times you wish you could delete a thread huh?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #3  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
thats a 30, and a 33, not a 63 :P


EDIT: this is one of those times you wish you could delete a thread huh?
really?

they go in sequence though

so i dont understand....

i'll check them out then
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #4  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
um... 30... 33... that would be in sequence

Its not 3 long, 3 long, 3 short

Its 3 long, 0 short, 3 long 3 short
30, 33.

EDIT:
30: Split air solenoid.
33: Port air solenoid valve.

Done.

Last edited by Kenteth; Aug 12, 2004 at 12:49 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #5  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
um... 30... 33... that would be in sequence

Its not 3 long, 3 long, 3 short

Its 3 long, 0 short, 3 long 3 short
30, 33.

EDIT:
30: Split air solenoid.
33: Port air solenoid valve.

Done.
sweet thanks
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #6  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
What are your mods, a modified intake (emissions side) will throw those codes regulary and they aren't an issue. If your car is unmodded, those codes will probaby be resulting in your cat clogging up in about a month or two... Not to mention they may indicate bigger problems. Did you pull any other codes?

And put your car info (mainly year and trim) in your sig, makes it ten times easier for someone wanting to help you, easpeically if the help is series dependant (as CEL codes are.)
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #7  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
What are your mods, a modified intake (emissions side) will throw those codes regulary and they aren't an issue. If your car is unmodded, those codes will probaby be resulting in your cat clogging up in about a month or two... Not to mention they may indicate bigger problems. Did you pull any other codes?

And put your car info (mainly year and trim) in your sig, makes it ten times easier for someone wanting to help you, easpeically if the help is series dependant (as CEL codes are.)
my bad

i have an 89 gxl
unmodded

could it be that my cat is plugged up then? i have the solenoids out and they look alright...
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #8  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally Posted by akademiks
my bad

i have an 89 gxl
unmodded
I had to check your profile.

Those two CEL codes will be tripped if either the port air solenoid or air solenoid valves are either disconnected or shortted. IRRC the port air solenoid is the white solenoid on the vac rack. The port air valve, I believe is... i dunno, I'll have to look it up.

Anyhow, The solenoids are snugged between the oil fill tube and the alternator kinda. Just make sure those are all plugged in.

EDIT: NM, solenoids you are looking for are grey and blue.
Attached Thumbnails misprint in FSM? (engine codes)-untitled1.jpg  

Last edited by Kenteth; Aug 12, 2004 at 01:16 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:14 PM
  #9  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
I had to check your profile.

Those two CEL codes will be tripped if either the port air solenoid or air solenoid valves are either disconnected or shortted. IRRC the port air solenoid is the white solenoid on the vac rack. The port air valve, I believe is... i dunno, I'll have to look it up.

Anyhow, The solenoids are snugged between the oil fill tube and the alternator kinda. Just make sure those are all plugged in.

yup
those are fine

i'll going back out to plug in the port air and air solenoids, i'll check the vac rack though
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:21 PM
  #10  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Flow charts, yay. Not super helpful though. IMO if one of these were really to go bad, I'd rip out the entire emission system... but im in the middle of nowhere were they don't care if you spew toxic fumes into little birdies lungs...

EDIT: DAMN I was wrong. Ok, all the physical rats nest solenoids should be fine in that they didn't trip. What did was the ACV. And why they don't just say ACV is beyond me, woudl be much easier. check the attatchments
Attached Thumbnails misprint in FSM? (engine codes)-untitled12.jpg   misprint in FSM? (engine codes)-untitled23.jpg   misprint in FSM? (engine codes)-untitled1321.jpg   misprint in FSM? (engine codes)-untitled2321321.jpg  

Last edited by Kenteth; Aug 12, 2004 at 01:29 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:30 PM
  #11  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
Flow charts, yay. Not super helpful though. IMO if one of these were really to go bad, I'd rip out the entire emission system... but im in the middle of nowhere were they don't care if you spew toxic fumes into little birdies lungs...

EDIT: DAMN I was wrong. Ok, all the physical rats nest solenoids should be fine in that they didn't trip. What did was the ACV. And why they don't just say ACV is beyond me, woudl be much easier. check the attatchments
yeah

i checked that out, i have that on my computer

although, where it says check continuity between solenoid valve and ECU...how is that possible?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #12  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally Posted by akademiks
yeah

i checked that out, i have that on my computer

although, where it says check continuity between solenoid valve and ECU...how is that possible?
Continuity means the wire isn't broken anywhere beteen the solenoid and the ECU.

no continuity means the wire is broken/shorted somewhere along the line.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:34 PM
  #13  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
Continuity means the wire isn't broken anywhere beteen the solenoid and the ECU.

no continuity means the wire is broken/shorted somewhere along the line.
gotcha

alright, so i would need a voltmeter to test both out correct?

also, what is it referring to when the FSM says battery and signal side?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:43 PM
  #14  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally Posted by akademiks
gotcha

alright, so i would need a voltmeter to test both out correct?

also, what is it referring to when the FSM says battery and signal side?
You wouldn't necessarily need a volt meter, but it would be ten times easier. Technicaly, a multimeter would be easier and you can use ohm-meter to check the continuity (or in the case of the meter-- resistance) much easier. Shoving 12volts into pins on the harness is a bad idea. The harness has a circuit which is a constant 5volts. If you short that 5 volts out to a sensor with a full 12v, you stand a good chance of blowing the sensor.

Where is "signal side" used in the FSM?

EDIT: nm, battery is the battery power to the ECU. Its saying, "check to make sure the ecu has power".

Signal side, is the sensor signal, which runs 12volts on some of the sensors/solenoids (mainly output) and 5 on the others (mainly input).

Last edited by Kenteth; Aug 12, 2004 at 01:46 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:46 PM
  #15  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
You wouldn't necessarily need a volt meter, but it would be ten times easier. Technicaly, a multimeter would be easier and you can use ohm-meter to check the continuity (or in the case of the meter-- resistance) much easier. Shoving 12volts into pins on the harness is a bad idea. The harness has a circuit which is a constant 5volts. If you short that 5 volts out to a sensor with a full 12v, you stand a good chance of blowing the sensor.

Where is "signal side" used in the FSM?
under the self diagnostic function attachements you posted

when asking for continuity between solenoid valve and ECU, it asks for solenoid valve, battery side, and signal side

btw, i'm reading one of your older posts concerning the same engine codes, maybe i might find something
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #16  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
haha, I've been fighting engine codes for awhile. However keep in mind, I have completely removed emissions system and hence trip ever CEL solenoid code. Its not unlike my car to have 5 codes sitting waiting to be pulled. they are all expected though, as being modified.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #17  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
well, i'm still trying to figure this out
besides the continuity of the ecu and these solenoids

should i be checking anything else?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 08:05 AM
  #18  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
...hows driving the car?

EDIT: and rick james is dead bitch, and that saying was always stupid and overused.

anyhow, if the car drives fine the only thing you are in concern of is the catalytic converter. If its not getting enough o2, or too much, you'll kill it off... if its not already.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 08:13 AM
  #19  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
...hows driving the car?

EDIT: and rick james is dead bitch, and that saying was always stupid and overused.

anyhow, if the car drives fine the only thing you are in concern of is the catalytic converter. If its not getting enough o2, or too much, you'll kill it off... if its not already.
alright, although i would like to look into this somehow....

EDIT: true, but i havent thought of anothet title yet
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #20  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally Posted by akademiks
alright, although i would like to look into this somehow....

EDIT: true, but i havent thought of anothet title yet
how about "my new title"

its 30 times better than rich james ****.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 08:32 AM
  #21  
akademiks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Originally Posted by Kenteth
how about "my new title"

its 30 times better than rich james ****.
i'll keep that in mind
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 08:36 AM
  #22  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally Posted by akademiks
i'll keep that in mind
much better title now, no complaints
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 10:47 AM
  #23  
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 3
From: Coldspring TX
I know you're trying to go by the FSM tests, and that's all well & good, but did you know you can check out every sensor (the ones that matter, anyway) from the ECU? Nice & easy, don't have to rip anything apart in the engine bay, AND you'll be checking the entire circuit, not just a sensor here, continuity there, etc... Try it ... ECU inputs are in a chart somewhere in your FSM (section 4A for the S4's).

If a sensor input voltage at the ECU is not what the FSM says it should be, THEN start start tearing apart connectors & such...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Aug 15, 2015 10:06 AM
Craze8
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
11
Aug 14, 2015 06:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.