Anyway to keep timing from advancing till a certain RPM?
#1
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyway to keep timing from advancing till a certain RPM?
1988 N/A
SAFC Installed - Not Tuned
2.5" exhaust from Manifold back.
S5 UIM / S4 LIM - Electronic VDI
Is there anyway I can keep the timing from advancing so much at 1500rpm till about maybe 2500, or maybe have it slowly start advancing instead of doing a big jump at 1500?
I listed some of the basic upgrades above if anyone needs to know to answer my question
Thanks
Justin
SAFC Installed - Not Tuned
2.5" exhaust from Manifold back.
S5 UIM / S4 LIM - Electronic VDI
Is there anyway I can keep the timing from advancing so much at 1500rpm till about maybe 2500, or maybe have it slowly start advancing instead of doing a big jump at 1500?
I listed some of the basic upgrades above if anyone needs to know to answer my question
Thanks
Justin
#2
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
iTrader: (3)
Retard box?
Full standalone?
Emanage blue with ignition harness/emanage ultimate?
I don't think you can alter the ECU's timing without altering the engine timing entirely, i.e. moving the CAS out a tooth or two. But that would affect the entire timing, not just the transition point.
I think some types of aftermarket ignition setups like the MSD have add-on boxes you can use for controling RPM during launch or for retarding during NOS shots etc, you may want to look into one of these because other than that I think a full standalone is really your only other good option.
Full standalone?
Emanage blue with ignition harness/emanage ultimate?
I don't think you can alter the ECU's timing without altering the engine timing entirely, i.e. moving the CAS out a tooth or two. But that would affect the entire timing, not just the transition point.
I think some types of aftermarket ignition setups like the MSD have add-on boxes you can use for controling RPM during launch or for retarding during NOS shots etc, you may want to look into one of these because other than that I think a full standalone is really your only other good option.
#3
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Darn. I was hoping there was something I could do other then a standalone. I guess I have to wait till Rtek comes out for n/as
Anyone else have any ideas?
Anyone else have any ideas?
#4
Doin a rebuild.
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roswell (atl ) Georgia
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why do you want to change the stock advancement? Why not just go for an across the board change?
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think that the timing advances under a certain temperature or before heavier throttle is added --- if you manipulated that sender you could possibly change the time when it advances.
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think that the timing advances under a certain temperature or before heavier throttle is added --- if you manipulated that sender you could possibly change the time when it advances.
#6
HAILERS
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
19 Posts
Unless there's something I don't understand, no matter where you cinch the crank angle sensor down, THAT is where the ECU is going to think TDC is (well, really L 5 and T 20 ).
The ECU will advance the timing around 1100 rpm.
The ECU will advance the timing around 1100 rpm.
#7
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It just seem wrong to have the timing advance so much at one point at around 1500, which is where I see it advance heavily. The engine does not like it. It pops like crazy. Even if I add or remove some fuel it doesn't make a difference. Only if I retard the timing by the CAS so it does not advance as high, will the engine run without poping or on rare occasions, miss, but then I don't have as much power higher up in the rpm range.
Trending Topics
#8
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by HAILERS
Unless there's something I don't understand, no matter where you cinch the crank angle sensor down, THAT is where the ECU is going to think TDC is (well, really L 5 and T 20 )
#9
HAILERS
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
19 Posts
You might try giving the cas thing a try although I don't think it will work. Nothing to lose.
You might try installing the initial set coupler and see if that effects anything. Can't drive like that though.
Here's a couple of jpgs of L and T timing at idle. The first is interesting only because I turned the a/c on at idle and saw the change from a minus 5 L and minus 20 T to what is shown on the Palm. Only having the a/c on did this. Turning the headlights on and stepping on the brakes had no effect. So is the a/c is on the timing advances at idle anyway.
The other jpg is just a car at idle and what I tried to do was just keep upping the rpms til the timing changed. This picture is a close as I could come. As soon as you hit 1100 something the darn thing advances right then and now to 1500 rpm, and heck, I forgot to capture the timing. It's SIMILAR to what you see in the first jpg with the a/c on, but NOT exactly the same animal.
You might try installing the initial set coupler and see if that effects anything. Can't drive like that though.
Here's a couple of jpgs of L and T timing at idle. The first is interesting only because I turned the a/c on at idle and saw the change from a minus 5 L and minus 20 T to what is shown on the Palm. Only having the a/c on did this. Turning the headlights on and stepping on the brakes had no effect. So is the a/c is on the timing advances at idle anyway.
The other jpg is just a car at idle and what I tried to do was just keep upping the rpms til the timing changed. This picture is a close as I could come. As soon as you hit 1100 something the darn thing advances right then and now to 1500 rpm, and heck, I forgot to capture the timing. It's SIMILAR to what you see in the first jpg with the a/c on, but NOT exactly the same animal.
#10
Doin a rebuild.
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roswell (atl ) Georgia
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by classicauto
That sender being the crank angle sensor?
I believe that there is a resistor mod for the throttle body temp sensor that just affects the timing and few other apects, unfortunately I was unable to find these in quick searches or the list of sensors for sure that affect the electronic spark advance system.
#11
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, the senders being the thermosensor on the throttle body
#15
HAILERS
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
19 Posts
I suppose because the fuel maps are different and the timing maps are different and the output of the boost/pressure sensor are different at a given pressure (such as at atmospheric pressure).
#16
Lives on the Forum
I think you're looking at the wrong place.
The rotary engine actually like a lot of advance timing, and the stock ECU really doesn't have enough of it!
Look elsewhere for your problem - it's not the advancing timing that's causing your problems.
-Ted
The rotary engine actually like a lot of advance timing, and the stock ECU really doesn't have enough of it!
Look elsewhere for your problem - it's not the advancing timing that's causing your problems.
-Ted
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
Engine Management Forum
11
11-09-15 01:15 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
08-15-15 10:06 AM