how much HP stock 20B shaft could handle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 04:39 AM
  #1  
20bfd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: moscow
how much HP stock 20B shaft could handle?

anyone knows for sure?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #2  
bladz311's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 505
Likes: 6
From: Los Angeles, CA
yea, I'd like to know also.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 11:04 PM
  #3  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
I believe that 900+hp 20b powered boat with the NRS ceramics and Gt42r turbo had a stock shaft.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 11:22 PM
  #4  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
T-von, wouldn't a more accurate answer depend on what setup you're running? If you're running the stock (or upgraded) sequential twins, it's in teh 400hp range IIRC (the whole deal w/ the e-shaft snapping w/ the stockers). IIRC, they addressed this w/ the upgraded e-shafts in the later (C & D) series motors, but it should be mentioned nonetheless, no? Don't think he specified whether he's running a large single or not.

~Ramy
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 12:14 AM
  #5  
AXMDR787BOY's Avatar
I am mad JDM tyte
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, here I come Japan!
What difference would the turbo set-up make? 400HP is 400HP no matter how you get there.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #6  
Falcoms's Avatar
kill it with BOOMSTICK!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
From: McHenry, IL
That is because with the stock twins the boost pressure is gradually increased to max boost and max power. With a big single, the power spikes once the turbo spools, making the power more of a shock to the E-shaft, as well as a way to force the shaft to flex from dramatically increased pressures and stresses.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:39 AM
  #7  
sillbeer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 1
From: Arizona
The upgraded e-shafts where in all the letter series motors. The original ones in the number only engines where the ones prone to failure.

-Destin
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 02:23 AM
  #8  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by Falcoms
That is because with the stock twins the boost pressure is gradually increased to max boost and max power. With a big single, the power spikes once the turbo spools, making the power more of a shock to the E-shaft, as well as a way to force the shaft to flex from dramatically increased pressures and stresses.
It's the exact opposite actually.

Here's what Dave Morris (DMRH) said with regards to a question about early series 20B motors:

As you have a first batch run engine, you may have issues with the shaft run-out depending on the engine KM. They where prone to flexing due to the "snap torque" of the twin turbo's around the 2000rpm area when the engine is under high lateral load.

If you are going to use the twin turbo's in a sequential operation then be aware of this factor.

If you intend to use the engine with a large single turbo (suspected) then this problem may never arise. The high load of the shaft will not cause a proble at high RPM were the single turbo is making power as the rotating inertia will counter any lateral forces.

All this is true as long as the shaft is perfect to start with. If the shaft is already out of spec, then you will destroy the engine every time you try to make power no matter how many times you rebuild with the same shaft.
And in another post, he continued to say:

The reason for the failures at low RPM under what the Japanese term "snap torque" is due to the higher "lateral" loading of the engine at this RPM. When the shaft goes from no load to 80-90% max torque within 1-second at this RPM it creates this situation. At a higher RPM, centrifical force reduces the lateral loading
So the point is, the e-shaft may be failure prone to the STOCK TWINS, and NOT to a large single.

Originally Posted by sillbeer
The upgraded e-shafts where in all the letter series motors. The original ones in the number only engines where the ones prone to failure.

-Destin
Destin, you are correct. Sorry, I got mixed up w/ the upgraded backing plates.

~Ramy
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 02:24 AM
  #9  
sillbeer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 1
From: Arizona
I was under the impression that it was prone to failure under the stock twins also. I couldn't remember exactly though.

-Destin
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 02:30 AM
  #10  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Some of the top racers have found the limit of the stock shaft. I've been told just over 1000 rwhp. Although there are some that claim they still use the stock shaft in very high output situations.
Only one way too tell I guess. Good old trial and error.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 02:43 AM
  #11  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
That, and again, since I def. trust Dave Morris (DMRH), who's a 20B guru, I think the limit of the e-shaft is dependent on your setup, namely b/c of the higher "lateral" loading of the engine at low RPMs, which only occurs w/ the twin turbo setup, and not a large single setup. A large single makes power at higher RPMs, where rotating inertia will counter any lateral forces.

So again, I think to accurately answer the question, you gotta specificy what setup

~Ramy

PS: Ivan, does it really matter? I'm sure you and I both know you're gonna find out the answer to your question the hard way hehe. Tranny: check. E-shaft: pending... (For those of you who don't know, he's straight broken TWO tranny's...the stock 13B w/ straight cut gears 1 - 3, in which he lost 4th gear on the dyno at 780rwhp LOL, and he broke the 13B 1200hp Acosta tranny...)

Last edited by FDNewbie; Oct 13, 2005 at 02:46 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 04:29 AM
  #12  
20bfd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: moscow
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
That, and again, since I def. trust Dave Morris (DMRH), who's a 20B guru, I think the limit of the e-shaft is dependent on your setup, namely b/c of the higher "lateral" loading of the engine at low RPMs, which only occurs w/ the twin turbo setup, and not a large single setup. A large single makes power at higher RPMs, where rotating inertia will counter any lateral forces.

So again, I think to accurately answer the question, you gotta specificy what setup

~Ramy

PS: Ivan, does it really matter? I'm sure you and I both know you're gonna find out the answer to your question the hard way hehe. Tranny: check. E-shaft: pending... (For those of you who don't know, he's straight broken TWO tranny's...the stock 13B w/ straight cut gears 1 - 3, in which he lost 4th gear on the dyno at 780rwhp LOL, and he broke the 13B 1200hp Acosta tranny...)

well, season is over here and I am planing to rebuild my engine and be ready for the next summer. Main reason why I want to do it is because I have some carter gases going out more than ususally. I think some of the o-rings were overheated. I used viton seals, are there any better seals available??

Also I am going to switch to ethanol, throw away my big intercooler and fit a little larger turbo ( it is ITS GT80R now). I used RA 2mm apex seals, their first release! many people claimed that they are bad but hopefully I had no issues even after 30+ races (maybe more). Bruce ( manufacturer of the seals) said that they might not handle high temperatures but my EGT never shown more than 780deg C so I guess its alright. But anyway I am going to switch to NRS 2mm ceramics.

Acosta also adviced that 1000whp is a limit for the stock shaft, so now I am curious if I need to invest into upgraded shaft or not...its not cheap!

As for tranny, then Acosta just shipped me new "improved" parts. I have not got it yet. Hope it will work better now! But this is not for my car but for customers car. I am using th350 and going to switch to th400.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #13  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by 20bfd3s
Acosta also adviced that 1000whp is a limit for the stock shaft, so now I am curious if I need to invest into upgraded shaft or not...its not cheap!


Check with these guys here. They have a 20b e-shaft with center bearing that they have fabricated in their own shop. It's rated up to 14k rpms.

https://www.rx7club.com/20b-forum-95/mechanical-power-systems-3-rotor-fc-469177/
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 08:48 PM
  #14  
RoTaRyBoYz's Avatar
InsaneRotaries.com
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,748
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
friend of mine told me that Pepe loco mx6 uses the stock shaft at about 1025hp on c16 and they dont rev pass 8k rpm.....pepe tried running a custom guru shaft but it broke....one time i ask abel which shaft is better, the stocker or the custom shaft made for him by mike long at gforce transmissions....he showed me a few stock shafts in this trailer and he said thats what he uses.....1400hp on a stock eshaft is hard to swallow
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #15  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
t-von, thanks for that thread. I just posted in it, hoping to see if we can get a price on that e-shaft.

RoTaRyBoYz, can your friend verify this info? I'm not big on heresay. It would make sense that they don't rev past 8K rpm, b/c that's when you'll prob see the stock e-shaft flexing. I think that's what it's really all about...flexing at higher rpms. Keep 'em low, you got nothing to worry about.

He said he broke the guru e-shaft? That the custom 2-piece one? I hear they're coming out w/ a 3-piece shaft. I'd appreciate it if you could verify which shaft he broke from Guru. That's a lot of money to dump into something that may break...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #16  
RoTaRyBoYz's Avatar
InsaneRotaries.com
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,748
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
called my friend Roy today and he told me that a NA 20b will flex its eshaft about 20 thousant of an inch @ 10K rpm.....he said that Pepe dont rev his motor pass 7400 rpm because the motor was built to run at a lower rpm to avoid shaft flex....thats why we dont see alot of PP turbo 20bs in Pro class (abel,Pepe) because with the pport motor u'll have to rev it pass 10K rpm to make the power ....so they rather run a side port motor (street or bridge) to 8K rpm with higer boost than a Pport motor with a lower boost level at 10K rpm....so it looks like RPM is a MAJOR problem with the 20b's,so thats the reason these guys keep the side port...i've herd (rumor) that Abel used 5different shafts but ended up with the factory one because it worked best....alot of these 20b race cars make about the same power (1000-1150) with the exception of Abel and Major league...as of right now it seems like the only way to go for big HP is to get a custom short crank 3rotor...shorter eshaft = less flex
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 01:11 AM
  #17  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
RoTaRyBoYz, thanks for getting back to me. I was pretty sure they don't go past 8K rpm b/c of the e-shaft flex.

Did your friend Roy tell you what e-shaft it was? Ie, was it in fact the Guru e-shaft they broke? (one of the 5). And was it a one or two piece e-shaft?

Also, how would you accomplish making a custom short crank 3rotor? I would think a multi-piece e-shaft (like the one Guru's coming out w/...the 3 piece one) would solve the issue w/ e-shaft flexing @ higher rpms? Here's what they say on their website (re: the 13B 2-piece e-shaft, but I'm sure the same applies to the 2 and 3 piece 20B shaft they're working on):

GURU Racing can supply a two piece eccentric shaft for a 13B engine that substantially reduces eccentric shaft flex as well as providing extra bearing surface area. The end result is increased horsepower with substantially increased reliability!

The unit is especially designed for exceptionally high horse-powered and high revving engines, where bearing fatigue and crank flex is detrimental to engine reliability.


  • 30% more bearing surface area than a standard 13B Shaft
  • Helps reduce bearing failure & fatigue on high boosted turbo engines
  • Helps eliminate crankshaft flex at high rpms
  • Reduces crankshaft flex therefore rotor clearance can be set to a minimum and seal clearances can be set tighter for increased horsepower
  • Stronger
  • 1.2kg lighter than a "standard" eccentric shaft
  • Kit supplied with all components (including needle roller bearing) and specifications for centre housing machining to fit the centre bearing.

Last edited by FDNewbie; Oct 15, 2005 at 01:14 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 02:47 AM
  #18  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Hmmm makes me wonder what kind of e-shaft the NA PP 13G had?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 12:21 PM
  #19  
RoTaRyBoYz's Avatar
InsaneRotaries.com
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,748
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Originally Posted by t-von
Hmmm makes me wonder what kind of e-shaft the NA PP 13G had?
speaking of 13g, did u guys know that theres a green 2ndgen Pro Rwd car from NJ that runs a $30k Racing Beat 13g motor.....the "mothers performance" 2nd gen runs the 13g peri with a single turbo and racing beat rates the motor as being reliable at only 700hp anything after that is asking for trouble (tomuch flex maybe?)....it looks like everyone is running the stock shaft, even abel....Roy dont like giving out to much info on these guys,but i'll try picking his brain again next time i see him...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #20  
RoTaRyBoYz's Avatar
InsaneRotaries.com
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,748
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
RoTaRyBoYz, how would you accomplish making a custom short crank 3rotor?
a guy in New Zealand makes a cutom 3rotor kit that uses all 13b parts and its a little shorter than a factory 20b...because it uses a shorter eshaft it has less flex than the 20b....i think the kits come with a new eshaft and new modify cast iron plates for about $7000
another fella in NZ can build u a 1400hp short crank 3rotor, peri port with tripple turbos and motec for about $120k US...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #21  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by RoTaRyBoYz
a guy in New Zealand makes a cutom 3rotor kit that uses all 13b parts and its a little shorter than a factory 20b...because it uses a shorter eshaft it has less flex than the 20b....i think the kits come with a new eshaft and new modify cast iron plates for about $7000
another fella in NZ can build u a 1400hp short crank 3rotor, peri port with tripple turbos and motec for about $120k US...
Got any contact info for these guys?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 09:39 AM
  #22  
13btnos's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 797
Likes: 4
From: VISTA
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Got any contact info for these guys?
http://www.kiwi-re.com/index.php
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #23  
Bern's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 25 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
Originally Posted by RoTaRyBoYz
....Abel... showed me a few stock shafts in this trailer and he said thats what he uses.....1400hp on a stock eshaft is hard to swallow

Hard to swallow, but true! Flaco uses a stock 20B e-shaft... ok that being said, it's never as easy as it sounds.

One needs to begin with a quality rotating assembly. Flaco has been using Racing Beat balanced and lightened rotating assemblies, and we feel there are none better... these things are a work of art.

After delivery of the assembly from Racing Beat, Flaco Racing uses a 8-step proprietary process on the e-shaft, and a 3-step process on the Rotors, to make the whole thing live happly ever after. Flaco has been using the same OEM e-shaft in the 20B now for two years, and he revs the motor to 10k. This set-up is so nice that no break-in is needed at all... it's ready to run out of the box! This thing is not only rock solid, but it makes power!

The drawback... about $10K+ per rotating assembly. Slightly less for 13B set-ups.

If anyone is intrested in a complete assembly, just contact me.

to answer question.... 1300-1400hp no issues.


-Bern
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #24  
Bern's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 25 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
Originally Posted by RoTaRyBoYz
...a fella in NZ can build u a 1400hp short crank 3rotor, peri port with tripple turbos and motec for about $120k US...
1400hp

be careful when you throw #'s like this around...

-Bern
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sobr609
20B Forum
8
Feb 11, 2019 03:19 PM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
rx7jocke
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 15, 2015 03:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.