1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Yeah, K&N is awesome...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-05, 05:07 PM
  #1  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
christaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down Yeah, K&N is awesome...

So I had my buddy's portable dyno over here today, dynoing my dad's racecar ('85 GSL, 90k miles on stock 12A, 3" pipe, RB header, etc.). Car had a new K&N on it for all the other screwing around we did. Last run, put Purolator paper filter on it. I put this filter on when doing dyno work on my car in September-ish. It ran a full race weekend at TMS (basically a 2 mile chassis dyno with some twisty ****), a 6-hour enduro (which put 600+ race miles on the car), and an extended regional race with this very filter. The Purolator (which has turned a nice gray from dirt and dust) made .5HP more than the NEW K&N. On my car six months ago, a K&N was 2HP better than a BLACK Purolator, and the new Purolator was 4HP more than the New K&N.

So, yeah, K&N is awesome.



(If you think you're smart because you have a ratcheting screwdriver with a light on the end of it, please back away slowly from this thread.)
Old 05-17-05, 05:34 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
boog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: las vegas
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That sucks, i have a k&n
Old 05-17-05, 05:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carberetors are sensitive to vacuum in reguards to the fuel mixture they end up dumping. So Even though the K&N is physically less restrictive to airflow your carb doesn't compensate for the lower vacuum level at the jets. By the way you're running lean.

Vernon
Old 05-17-05, 05:36 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (13)
 
Rx-7Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Kn filters

Kn filters only start working well when they start to get dirty.
Old 05-17-05, 06:55 PM
  #5  
Lorem ipsum dolor sit ame

 
cdrad51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Net
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
like my ex
Old 05-17-05, 07:14 PM
  #6  
Rockn' The Galant

 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You've got to take into account different runs with different temperatures...there's no SURE fire way of telling the HP gain from an air filter unless you do them on two different days with the same temp and weather (humidity, etc).

- Tech
Old 05-17-05, 08:34 PM
  #7  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (9)
 
Alak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,040
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The air is so clean up here in Canada I dont need to use an air filter.
Old 05-17-05, 08:58 PM
  #8  
Airflow is my life

 
Rx7carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting Chris. However I wouldnt make final judgements just yet. There are variables that could account for this. If you have a K&N thats over oiled it could restrict airflow. Im not in any way doubting your results, just saying that they could be skewed. And just the tolerances of the dyno can skew the results. They arent that sensitive/ calibrated. What airbox are you using? Stock I guess from your avatar? Those thing flow like poop. Unlike a dyno, a flowbench is calibrated before each use (at lesat mine is) and is VERY sensitive to changes. I have some data I took a while back, Ill try to dig it up.
Old 05-17-05, 09:13 PM
  #9  
Full Member

 
Tyrael6666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7doctor
Kn filters only start working well when they start to get dirty.
Hes right, a lot of times it is recommended that you only clean those filters once every 60,000+ miles (depends on condtions) because they work their best when they are dirty.
Old 05-17-05, 09:27 PM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

 
Kentetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 11,359
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by cdrad51
like my ex
LMAO!!!
Old 05-17-05, 09:28 PM
  #11  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
christaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by NewRXr
By the way you're running lean.
I kinda doubt it... A/F is spot-on, best of any of my FB's so far.

Originally Posted by Rx7carl
Interesting Chris. However I wouldnt make final judgements just yet. There are variables that could account for this. If you have a K&N thats over oiled it could restrict airflow. Im not in any way doubting your results, just saying that they could be skewed. And just the tolerances of the dyno can skew the results. They arent that sensitive/ calibrated. What airbox are you using? Stock I guess from your avatar? Those thing flow like poop. Unlike a dyno, a flowbench is calibrated before each use (at lesat mine is) and is VERY sensitive to changes. I have some data I took a while back, Ill try to dig it up.
Well, this is the second car and the second K&N filter that has sucked. Unfortunately, I didn't have a new Purolator (which consequently is the cheapest paper filter I've ever found) so I can't attest to the 4HP gain vs. K&N.

BTW - this wasn't on some POS DynoJet or Mustang Dyno. It's a DynoDynamics, Australian made version, wide-band O2 and all the hot-****. When I say, "Run", I don't mean one. Every time we do something we make 2-3 runs in succession, since as anybody that's played with a rotary on a dyno knows, they put up better numbers as they get hotter. And, since this is the second time I've gotten the same results, I tend to believe what I see.

BTW #2 - the DD is probably the most repeatable dyno you'll ever find. Since the correction isn't done by Buder and a **** on the side of the machine, you'll end up with very close results over a long period of time. If I can, I'll put my street car on the dyno next time it's out here and see what it says. Hopefully Brian will see this thread and chime in with some of the specifics of the dyno... I know you'll be impressed, Carl, and probably wouldn't put your car on anything but one in the future.
Old 05-17-05, 09:37 PM
  #12  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaryRevn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read on the gmc message boards that people who dynoed their trucks with the k&n filtercharger kit on the 99 and up sierra/yukons actually lost hp's over the stock set up.
Old 05-18-05, 03:28 AM
  #13  
So little time and money

 
1984special's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NorCAL
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to have a k&n cone on my Yota and while it made lots of cool noise, it doesn't filter for crap. When I hold it up to the light, I see lots and lots of holes....

I have since switched to foam on my DD yota.

Here is an interesting read on air-filters in general. It is quite the topic of debate the toyota forums...

Another one here as well.

HTH
Old 05-18-05, 07:46 AM
  #14  
Rockn' The Galant

 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotary Engines have nothing to do with the intake element being hotter in different tempatures.

Think about it...

- Tech
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gabescanlon
V-8 Powered RX-7's
47
03-21-16 12:45 PM
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
12-08-15 01:45 PM
Coochas
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
09-24-15 04:54 AM
Captain Hook
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
09-22-15 01:12 PM



Quick Reply: Yeah, K&N is awesome...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.