1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Yeah, K&N is awesome...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #1  
christaylor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 2
From: Austin, Texas
Thumbs down Yeah, K&N is awesome...

So I had my buddy's portable dyno over here today, dynoing my dad's racecar ('85 GSL, 90k miles on stock 12A, 3" pipe, RB header, etc.). Car had a new K&N on it for all the other screwing around we did. Last run, put Purolator paper filter on it. I put this filter on when doing dyno work on my car in September-ish. It ran a full race weekend at TMS (basically a 2 mile chassis dyno with some twisty ****), a 6-hour enduro (which put 600+ race miles on the car), and an extended regional race with this very filter. The Purolator (which has turned a nice gray from dirt and dust) made .5HP more than the NEW K&N. On my car six months ago, a K&N was 2HP better than a BLACK Purolator, and the new Purolator was 4HP more than the New K&N.

So, yeah, K&N is awesome.



(If you think you're smart because you have a ratcheting screwdriver with a light on the end of it, please back away slowly from this thread.)
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:34 PM
  #2  
boog's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
That sucks, i have a k&n
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, TX
Carberetors are sensitive to vacuum in reguards to the fuel mixture they end up dumping. So Even though the K&N is physically less restrictive to airflow your carb doesn't compensate for the lower vacuum level at the jets. By the way you're running lean.

Vernon
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #4  
Rx-7Doctor's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 12
From: Oregon
Kn filters

Kn filters only start working well when they start to get dirty.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #5  
cdrad51's Avatar
Lorem ipsum dolor sit ame
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 1
From: The Net
like my ex
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #6  
Tech_Greek's Avatar
Rockn' The Galant
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
From: Shreveport, LA
You've got to take into account different runs with different temperatures...there's no SURE fire way of telling the HP gain from an air filter unless you do them on two different days with the same temp and weather (humidity, etc).

- Tech
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #7  
Alak's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Canada
The air is so clean up here in Canada I dont need to use an air filter.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #8  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Interesting Chris. However I wouldnt make final judgements just yet. There are variables that could account for this. If you have a K&N thats over oiled it could restrict airflow. Im not in any way doubting your results, just saying that they could be skewed. And just the tolerances of the dyno can skew the results. They arent that sensitive/ calibrated. What airbox are you using? Stock I guess from your avatar? Those thing flow like poop. Unlike a dyno, a flowbench is calibrated before each use (at lesat mine is) and is VERY sensitive to changes. I have some data I took a while back, Ill try to dig it up.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:13 PM
  #9  
Tyrael6666's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by rx7doctor
Kn filters only start working well when they start to get dirty.
Hes right, a lot of times it is recommended that you only clean those filters once every 60,000+ miles (depends on condtions) because they work their best when they are dirty.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:27 PM
  #10  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
Originally Posted by cdrad51
like my ex
LMAO!!!
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #11  
christaylor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 2
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by NewRXr
By the way you're running lean.
I kinda doubt it... A/F is spot-on, best of any of my FB's so far.

Originally Posted by Rx7carl
Interesting Chris. However I wouldnt make final judgements just yet. There are variables that could account for this. If you have a K&N thats over oiled it could restrict airflow. Im not in any way doubting your results, just saying that they could be skewed. And just the tolerances of the dyno can skew the results. They arent that sensitive/ calibrated. What airbox are you using? Stock I guess from your avatar? Those thing flow like poop. Unlike a dyno, a flowbench is calibrated before each use (at lesat mine is) and is VERY sensitive to changes. I have some data I took a while back, Ill try to dig it up.
Well, this is the second car and the second K&N filter that has sucked. Unfortunately, I didn't have a new Purolator (which consequently is the cheapest paper filter I've ever found) so I can't attest to the 4HP gain vs. K&N.

BTW - this wasn't on some POS DynoJet or Mustang Dyno. It's a DynoDynamics, Australian made version, wide-band O2 and all the hot-****. When I say, "Run", I don't mean one. Every time we do something we make 2-3 runs in succession, since as anybody that's played with a rotary on a dyno knows, they put up better numbers as they get hotter. And, since this is the second time I've gotten the same results, I tend to believe what I see.

BTW #2 - the DD is probably the most repeatable dyno you'll ever find. Since the correction isn't done by Buder and a **** on the side of the machine, you'll end up with very close results over a long period of time. If I can, I'll put my street car on the dyno next time it's out here and see what it says. Hopefully Brian will see this thread and chime in with some of the specifics of the dyno... I know you'll be impressed, Carl, and probably wouldn't put your car on anything but one in the future.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #12  
RotaryRevn's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 2
I read on the gmc message boards that people who dynoed their trucks with the k&n filtercharger kit on the 99 and up sierra/yukons actually lost hp's over the stock set up.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 03:28 AM
  #13  
1984special's Avatar
So little time and money
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 746
Likes: 1
From: NorCAL
I used to have a k&n cone on my Yota and while it made lots of cool noise, it doesn't filter for crap. When I hold it up to the light, I see lots and lots of holes....

I have since switched to foam on my DD yota.

Here is an interesting read on air-filters in general. It is quite the topic of debate the toyota forums...

Another one here as well.

HTH
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 07:46 AM
  #14  
Tech_Greek's Avatar
Rockn' The Galant
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
From: Shreveport, LA
Rotary Engines have nothing to do with the intake element being hotter in different tempatures.

Think about it...

- Tech
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gabescanlon
V-8 Powered RX-7's
47
Mar 21, 2016 12:45 PM
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
Dec 8, 2015 01:45 PM
Coochas
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
Sep 24, 2015 04:54 AM
Captain Hook
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
Sep 22, 2015 01:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.