A stupid Question
Also the '79-'80 were "SA" and not "FB".
In 1981 Mazda switched to the now common-place VIN system. The early VINs were something like: SA22C-501234
There are more details in the FAQ. Search for "FB" on https://www.rx7club.com/1st-generation-specific-1979-1985-18/1st-gen-rx-7-faq-page-237777/
In 1981 Mazda switched to the now common-place VIN system. The early VINs were something like: SA22C-501234
There are more details in the FAQ. Search for "FB" on https://www.rx7club.com/1st-generation-specific-1979-1985-18/1st-gen-rx-7-faq-page-237777/
Originally Posted by Doctor.Jekyll
Also the '79-'80 were "SA" and not "FB".
In 1981 Mazda switched to the now common-place VIN system. The early VINs were something like: SA22C-501234
There are more details in the FAQ. Search for "FB" on https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=237777
In 1981 Mazda switched to the now common-place VIN system. The early VINs were something like: SA22C-501234
There are more details in the FAQ. Search for "FB" on https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=237777
Trending Topics
S4 Good........is easier to find,cheaper and mechanically easier to swap into the 1st gen since it has more in common with the GSL-SE engine.Plenty of upgrades out there to make more power,including a S5 turbo upgrade.
S4 Bad......its less HP and torque than S5 out of the box.Its control systems are more archaic and restrictive and theres no conventional check engine light.Exhaust manifold and wastegate designs blow goat ***.
S5 Good....faster ECU speed,smoother controls and AFM,more power and torque out of the box,WAY better manifold and wastegate design(same turbo compressor),no EGR valve,has a real check engine light. All in all,more refined than S4.
S5 Bad......costs more,harder to find.The electronic OMP makes 1st gen motor mounting difficult (but not impossible) to do when retaining the stock ECU and oil metering.S5 turbo wastegate bulge gets very close to the idler arm...HOT,HOT,HOT
Either can make a 1st gen quick.I ran both and was floored by the difference in pickup compared to my old carbed 12A and 13B.If you want a rotary to make torque like it never had before,the TII engine delivers.I have to give the nod to the S5 though.Its been much less quirky with its controls,its cake to diagnose and the off-boost power is better.The "bads" of the S5 swap are more than offset by the good.It wasnt too hard to overcome the S5 problems once I became familiar with the TII engines.
S4 Bad......its less HP and torque than S5 out of the box.Its control systems are more archaic and restrictive and theres no conventional check engine light.Exhaust manifold and wastegate designs blow goat ***.
S5 Good....faster ECU speed,smoother controls and AFM,more power and torque out of the box,WAY better manifold and wastegate design(same turbo compressor),no EGR valve,has a real check engine light. All in all,more refined than S4.
S5 Bad......costs more,harder to find.The electronic OMP makes 1st gen motor mounting difficult (but not impossible) to do when retaining the stock ECU and oil metering.S5 turbo wastegate bulge gets very close to the idler arm...HOT,HOT,HOT
Either can make a 1st gen quick.I ran both and was floored by the difference in pickup compared to my old carbed 12A and 13B.If you want a rotary to make torque like it never had before,the TII engine delivers.I have to give the nod to the S5 though.Its been much less quirky with its controls,its cake to diagnose and the off-boost power is better.The "bads" of the S5 swap are more than offset by the good.It wasnt too hard to overcome the S5 problems once I became familiar with the TII engines.
Last edited by steve84GS TII; Oct 13, 2005 at 12:46 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Adaptronic S5 Turbo PNP Unit questions
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
May 25, 2021 05:37 AM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Sep 11, 2015 12:13 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM



