1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Driveshaft question (83)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 02:51 PM
  #1  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Question Driveshaft question (83)

Ok, I have an '83 GS with a driveline vibration. I have gotten conflicting info about the u-joints used in 83. Some say they are non-serviceable units, such as those used in the 84 & 85 models. Others show the replaceable joints that were used in 79-82 models.
I have heard that both styles were used in 83, so how does a person go about determining which type they have? Are the non-replaceable joints larger?
Is there any easy way to tell which type I have, short of just tearing it apart?

Last edited by Rogue_Wulff; Oct 12, 2005 at 02:54 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 09:47 PM
  #2  
RUBY7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 1
From: Australia
I would suspect that you would most definately have the serviceable type. However if you are unsure Mazda will identify it by using your chassi no.

Hope this helps
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #3  
Whanrow's Avatar
Certified Old Fart
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Inkerman, On, South of Ottawa, the 2nd coldest Capital in the World
Not sure if they are serviceable or not, but I have a friend that works at a driveline shop that will even custom build driveshafts. They have replaced many of the "non-serviceable" ones. My friend checked and APPARENTLY if you do replace the "non-serviceable" ones, they are still never just right, and you have a vibration at some speed or another.

I'm sure you will receive confilicting info from other people - I can only go by what I've been told. I suspect its very subjective.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #4  
lovintha7's Avatar
Suicidal Death Missile
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Virginia
83 was a split year. You'll have to look at the driveshaft and see if there are any clips holding the u-joint into the yokes or not. If not, then it's the nonserviceable type.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #5  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Originally Posted by lovintha7
83 was a split year. You'll have to look at the driveshaft and see if there are any clips holding the u-joint into the yokes or not. If not, then it's the nonserviceable type.
Easier to say, than do. My car sits about 2" lower than stock. I did raise it up earlier today, but didn't go under it due to not having safety stands at the time.
However, the joints look to be the same as the servicable units I saw today. I cannot tell for sure as to whether there are any visible clips.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 11:48 PM
  #6  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 25
From: Socal
Yup, the u-joints does not have a c-clip like the pre-81. A custom driveshaft is much cheaper than mazdatrix. However, the u-joints are much larger than stock so you will need to loose the heat shield.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 07:40 PM
  #7  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Dropped the shaft today. They are the "non-serviceable" joints. Good thing that wasn't the problem.
Someone used mis-matched bolts on the flange, 2 different styles, and put the mates beside each other. Even my super calibrated bare hands could feel the weight difference. I didn't have any others that would work, so I just reused those, placing them staggered, and most of the vibration disappeared. I'll get 4 that match and replace them in a couple days, along with using my needle tip grease gun adapter so I can add some lube.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #8  
lovintha7's Avatar
Suicidal Death Missile
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Virginia
Make sure you get the equavalent of grade 8 or so.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #9  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
Originally Posted by lovintha7
Make sure you get the equavalent of grade 8 or so.
Sorry, but those are grade 10 bolts. So are the pp bolts.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #10  
smnc's Avatar
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,126
Likes: 4
From: Acton, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by trochoid
Sorry, but those are grade 10 bolts. So are the pp bolts.
I think you're refering to class 10.9...?
That's the metric equivilant to grade 8 imperial.

Metric class 8.8 is equivilant to standard class 5....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM
Enzo1944
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 6, 2015 08:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.