1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Fb master cylinder upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-15, 11:36 AM
  #1  
william

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Willopap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fb master cylinder upgrade

Hey guys! I was wondering what some of you guys have done to upgrade you're master cylinders? Looking for a nice bolt-in setup, but little modifications I'm okay with! preferably 1".
Thanks
Old 02-05-15, 11:59 AM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (25)
 
Landon303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: clearwater, florida
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
in the FC I've done several 929 swaps, which uses the master/booster/prop valve all from a 929. Just eye balling it (sorry, i can only offer you the idea ) It looks like the major hurdle would be shifting the clutch master out further toward the fender, for space reasons. Definitely worth looking into, however.
Old 02-05-15, 11:52 PM
  #3  
Always Wanting to Learn

iTrader: (49)
 
DreamInRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge, Minnesota
Posts: 3,078
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
I know someone who did a Wilwood install, he seems to like it a lot.
Old 02-06-15, 07:54 AM
  #4  
william

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Willopap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Landon303
in the FC I've done several 929 swaps, which uses the master/booster/prop valve all from a 929. Just eye balling it (sorry, i can only offer you the idea ) It looks like the major hurdle would be shifting the clutch master out further toward the fender, for space reasons. Definitely worth looking into, however.
Nice nice! Ive seen that done on some threads looks like an option.
Old 02-06-15, 07:55 AM
  #5  
william

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Willopap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DreamInRotary
I know someone who did a Wilwood install, he seems to like it a lot.
I was looking at those M/Cs and was thinking they look similar. Was it a direct bolt in?
Thanks
Old 02-06-15, 11:15 AM
  #6  
Always Wanting to Learn

iTrader: (49)
 
DreamInRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge, Minnesota
Posts: 3,078
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by Willopap
I was looking at those M/Cs and was thinking they look similar. Was it a direct bolt in?
Thanks
I can't remember what he said, I'll ask him and see how it went. I don't think it was too hard though. He also went LS3 V8 with a T56 6-speed behind it - but didn't change the clutch master cylinder mounting location so it should be the same.
Old 02-06-15, 05:32 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cardiff, CA
Posts: 807
Received 120 Likes on 85 Posts
Just interested. Why do you want to change the master cylinder?
Old 02-06-15, 05:46 PM
  #8  
Rx7 Wagon

iTrader: (16)
 
Narfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Posts: 6,988
Received 875 Likes on 548 Posts
MCs with larger pistons are said to give better brake feel. A lesser range of motion is required to move the same amount of brake fluid, leading to firmer pedal feel.
Old 02-06-15, 05:54 PM
  #9  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cardiff, CA
Posts: 807
Received 120 Likes on 85 Posts
But you also have to push harder to make up for the larger diameter piston.

Stainless braided hoses and well maintained stock MC and calipers gives me very firm high pedal in my ITA car.

I will be interested to hear how you swap turns out.
Old 02-06-15, 11:32 PM
  #10  
william

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Willopap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Carl
Just interested. Why do you want to change the master cylinder?
Well Im entertaining the idea of doing a brake booster delete, and in the future a big brake kit. So to compensate for the lack of power assist the bigger piston master will allow me to get a bit more brake apply force. And Im in the market for a new master anyway as I am gathering parts to finish the restomod, so If I can get a bigger better one I might as well.
Originally Posted by Narfle
MCs with larger pistons are said to give better brake feel. A lesser range of motion is required to move the same amount of brake fluid, leading to firmer pedal feel.
I completely agree and math doesn't lie. If you have a larger diameter M/C piston, and even if you use the same amount of pedal pressure as you would a smaller (stock) diameter piston you will have more hydraulic pressure. More Pressure in the hydraulic system, more force applied to the caliper piston. Not to mention the brake pedal its self is a lever which adds mechanical advantage which outputs even more! .
Old 02-07-15, 07:47 AM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cardiff, CA
Posts: 807
Received 120 Likes on 85 Posts
Math definitely does not lie and it clearly says that a larger diameter piston will give less output pressure than a small diameter piston for the same pedal pressure. If you have a MC with 1 square inch bore (that would be a bit bigger than 1" diameter piston) and apply 200 lb of force to the input side of the piston (say 100 lb by your leg multiplied by 2 through the lever of the pedal) than the pressure generated in the system would be 200 lb/sqin. If you go to a larger piston with 2 sqin bore (about 1.6" diameter), then the fluid pressure generated at the outlet of the piston will be 100 lb/sqin (200lb force divided by 2 sqin).

So smaller MC means more pressure and larger MC means more fluid moved for same stroke. If you remove the brake booster you really want a smaller MC if you want to use the same pedal pressure.

Using larger brake rotors though can make up for the loss of pressure/force in other parts of the system.

If you go with big brakes, I definitely recommend doing both front and rear. I just did a conversion on our race car with fronts only and it was scary bad. Maybe OK for driving around on the street, but not when you really need the brakes. We then added big rear brakes to balance the rotor sizes front to rear and ended up with a really nice braking system. Not really needed for street driving or sprint racing, but absolutely bulletproof for endurance racing (8-14 hours at a time) due to the bigger rotor and pad mass.

I am heading out of town for the weekend, but when I get back I will post a link to a really good site that gives all the math for getting a good balanced brake system.
Old 02-10-15, 11:56 AM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cardiff, CA
Posts: 807
Received 120 Likes on 85 Posts
For really good explanations of brake systems, search on "James Walker brakes". Here is a link to part 3 (and I think 1 and 2) of an article he did for GRM. It explains things in a very straightforward manner.

Braking in plain English article, Brakes - Part 3, FAQ, FFR FAQ

Carl
Old 05-21-15, 09:01 PM
  #13  
Member of one

 
ricsrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Utah
Posts: 101
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
bump

i am adding larger brakes front (4 pistion) and rear, looking for a m/c upgrade
Old 05-23-15, 11:44 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smokeyfb33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: 94086
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just installed a brake booster from a 323 to give me more options on brake masters. With the 323 booster, it installs perfectly. It is the same size as the FB booser, but has to studs that are horizontal and not vertical.

After you have the booster that has horizontal studs you have opened up A LOT of options for brake masters.

I tried an FC booser first, but that wont work with out some signifigant modifaction. Same with the miata stuff.
Old 11-20-19, 08:55 AM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
kutukutu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southfield, MI
Posts: 1,296
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Carl
Math definitely does not lie and it clearly says that a larger diameter piston will give less output pressure than a small diameter piston for the same pedal pressure. If you have a MC with 1 square inch bore (that would be a bit bigger than 1" diameter piston) and apply 200 lb of force to the input side of the piston (say 100 lb by your leg multiplied by 2 through the lever of the pedal) than the pressure generated in the system would be 200 lb/sqin. If you go to a larger piston with 2 sqin bore (about 1.6" diameter), then the fluid pressure generated at the outlet of the piston will be 100 lb/sqin (200lb force divided by 2 sqin).

So smaller MC means more pressure and larger MC means more fluid moved for same stroke. If you remove the brake booster you really want a smaller MC if you want to use the same pedal pressure.

Using larger brake rotors though can make up for the loss of pressure/force in other parts of the system.

If you go with big brakes, I definitely recommend doing both front and rear. I just did a conversion on our race car with fronts only and it was scary bad. Maybe OK for driving around on the street, but not when you really need the brakes. We then added big rear brakes to balance the rotor sizes front to rear and ended up with a really nice braking system. Not really needed for street driving or sprint racing, but absolutely bulletproof for endurance racing (8-14 hours at a time) due to the bigger rotor and pad mass.

I am heading out of town for the weekend, but when I get back I will post a link to a really good site that gives all the math for getting a good balanced brake system.

Sorry to revive this thread, but i went with TII brakes all around for my FB.
You said you upgraded all 4 corners and it felt good. Did you make any changes to the MC or the prop valve?

Thanks.
Old 11-21-19, 01:26 PM
  #16  
OG Member
 
Holdfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Bay area California
Posts: 371
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Smokeyfb33
I just installed a brake booster from a 323 to give me more options on brake masters. With the 323 booster, it installs perfectly. It is the same size as the FB booser, but has to studs that are horizontal and not vertical.

After you have the booster that has horizontal studs you have opened up A LOT of options for brake masters.

I tried an FC booser first, but that wont work with out some signifigant modifaction. Same with the miata stuff.
what year 323 booster did u use?
Old 11-22-19, 05:33 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
Jon_Valjean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Napier
Posts: 476
Received 41 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by kutukutu1
Sorry to revive this thread, but i went with TII brakes all around for my FB.
You said you upgraded all 4 corners and it felt good. Did you make any changes to the MC or the prop valve?

Thanks.
I have FD front calipers on FC rotors with Endless brake pads, and Nissan rear calipers & rotors, using the FC turbo booster and a WRX 1" master and aftermarket adjustable brake prop valve. Car stops like it's hit a wall.
Old 11-24-19, 05:20 PM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
kutukutu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southfield, MI
Posts: 1,296
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
Thanks for the response
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
simronrx7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
06-28-14 09:50 PM
Colbskee
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
14
07-12-11 11:24 AM
C. Ludwig
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
03-01-04 09:47 AM



Quick Reply: Fb master cylinder upgrade



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.