1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

1st gen 13b rotary motor questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #1  
drdode's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX7GARAGE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 16
From: Valencia, CA
1st gen 13b rotary motor questions

Hey guys I tried to search for my specific questions but didn't really find it. I've owned all generation rx7's including 4 GSL-SE's. I really can't get over the 1st gens especially the SE. Now I want to get another 1st gen but I want some more naturally aspirated power. I was thinking to get another GSL-SE and get it street ported and add some bolt ons, or get a GSL (84-85) and swap a S5 (89-91) naturally aspirated motor and get that street ported and add the bolt ons. Now the extra power I can get from the S5, would I be able to match that power with the SE 13b motor with internal mods? like putting S5 rotors in it? Which route is better overall?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 10:27 AM
  #2  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the S5 is basically a revised version of the GSL-SE engine. there are only about 2-3 things that the S5 has that you couldn't add to a GSL-SE engine.

the S5 has larger ports and runners, the S5 (all FC's) have a larger diameter oil pump.

the S5 also has higher compression, lighter rotors, hardened stationary gears, and better tension bolts, but all these go right into a GSL-SE engine.

i had an FC engine in my GSL-SE and really liked it, then i put a GSL-SE engine in with an S5 rotating assembly and power was down by like 15hp... so i'm thinking the FC ports > higher compression rotors.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 08:47 PM
  #3  
drdode's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX7GARAGE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 16
From: Valencia, CA
cool man thanks for the info!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 09:27 PM
  #4  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by drdode
Which route is better overall?
starting with the complete S5 engine as a base. i have nothing against the S3 13B, but evolution is a good thing!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 04:22 AM
  #5  
drdode's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX7GARAGE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 16
From: Valencia, CA
Originally Posted by diabolical1
starting with the complete S5 engine as a base. i have nothing against the S3 13B, but evolution is a good thing!
not sure if you know, but around how much would a swap like that cost including the labor?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 05:44 AM
  #6  
Casey1.3's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: seattle
Just our the whole s5 keg in there or for originality if you put the s5 rotating assembly in the s4 keg your gonna have to find 2 blocks one s4 and one s5.. each block could cost 500 on a good deal but who knows when one of those will show up. Master Rebuild kit-1000 and another 1000 in labor if you choose to go that way. Better port that s3 block too-800 Do it yourself man you might learn something. And save a whole bunch of cash.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 05:45 AM
  #7  
Casey1.3's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: seattle
That will be a nice build Goodluck!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 05:47 AM
  #8  
Casey1.3's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: seattle
S3*
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 08:12 AM
  #9  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by drdode
not sure if you know, but around how much would a swap like that cost including the labor?
honestly, i have no clue.

i really don't know what S5 blocks go for these days. i've had no reason to look in a long time. also, keep in mind that you're looking for at least the engine, ECU and harness (unless you plan for a standalone). a rebuild may or may not be necessary, but you won't know until you get the engine and know the circumstances/history of it. as for labor, given the fact that your conversion would include wiring and the inevitable odds and ends that that will bring, there's no way to predict even if you were to figure ... say ... a $75 per hour shop rate.

a few other things to consider:

getting an SE would be beneficial because then you don't have to "find" an oil pan or front cover.

if you don't plan on doing the complete S5 ECU or a standalone, then it doesn't much matter which 6 port you start with.

if you do go with the S5 ECU, you'll have to find a way to get around the "missing" MOP.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 09:37 AM
  #10  
earthtone7se's Avatar
It's all about balance
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Raeford, NC
My understanding is that the 4 port from the S4 and S5 Turbo is better to use in NA form because you can port it out more than the 6 ports. If this is true, S5 Turbo engine minus the Turbo with S5 NA rotors, port the crap out of it and upgrade the fuel system (pump, injectors) and get a standalone ECU. This should yield the best possible NA results right? 250-300 NA hp?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 09:46 AM
  #11  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,872
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by earthtone7se
My understanding is that the 4 port from the S4 and S5 Turbo is better to use in NA form because you can port it out more than the 6 ports.

Opposite. Less port duration. The 6-port engines have too much duration, ports close way too late, the powerband that the port closing would indicate is beyond what the airflow capabilities of the engine are. 4-ports are more in harmony of what the port window vs. airflow capabilities are, and harmony in design results in harmony of driving and long story short the 4-port kicks *** and pwns face over the 6port.

Although I do wonder what a 6 port engine could do if you have 8.5 rotors in it for better high RPM internal airflow and a good intake manifold. Maybe crack 250whp with it, for the ten minutes that it could run between rebuilds. RPM Ruins Peoples Motors even rotaries.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #12  
Dave.Martin2008's Avatar
Anti piston
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
ohh man you guys are jerks now that I read this forum I am looking for an S4 and S5 assembly LoL
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 11:27 AM
  #13  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by drdode
not sure if you know, but around how much would a swap like that cost including the labor?
depends on labor rate

the 89-91 engine can run all the GSL-SE external accessories, which makes this basically the same amount of labor to do as a stock GSL-SE.

the part where it gets pricey is when you want to run the FC's ecu, which is fairly involved to install, and this could be something like 40+ hours by itself.

best combo is the FC engine with GSL-SE intake/ignition/ecu and some kind of aftermarket exhaust, it runs great, and is very easy to do.

the stock FC injection is picky, complex and you always need to find some weird/expensive/rare part
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 06:13 PM
  #14  
drdode's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX7GARAGE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 16
From: Valencia, CA
Great info guys! I appreciate it
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 01:08 PM
  #15  
Tui's Avatar
Tui
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: California
j9fd3s,

So there is not a problem using an engine block designed for four injectors?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 04:30 PM
  #16  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
the blocks themselves can be adapted to any 6-port setting, 2 or 4 injectors, because for the most part, the intakes are interchangeable.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 04:33 PM
  #17  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Tui
j9fd3s,

So there is not a problem using an engine block designed for four injectors?
only two injectors are on the engine, the FC's have two more on the intake, so if you keep the GSL-SE intake, then you keep 2 injectors
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 05:09 PM
  #18  
Tui's Avatar
Tui
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: California
Got it. Thank you
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Aug 15, 2015 01:38 PM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Aug 13, 2015 11:19 AM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.