Fastest TT FD I Have Ever Seen! ***VID***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:24 PM
  #126  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by hjholter3
It's that or HPtuners, and is better than nothing.
No, it's not just Edit or HPtuners. Those aren't the only options. Maybe you missed it, but there's also Predator, EFI Live, DFI, FAST, BS3, Megasquirt, Motec, Haltech, etc.

There are plenty of options for engine management. Most have at least one drawback, and many of them are not palatable because of the expense.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #127  
TT_Rex_7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Gallatin, TN
Originally Posted by hjholter3
In a drag application such as this one, the auto will be the most efficent way to transfer torque (which accelerates the car) from the engine to the wheels.
Yea but this is also a street application remember?

Originally Posted by hjholter3
Corvettes have more torque than your 'average' sport's car and don't require as much torque multiplication, but rather less input speed as provided by more gears
But now you just said earlier that you don't need many gears with more torque?! So now which is it?!

Originally Posted by hjholter3
If he only works a 40 hour week, he'll have 160 hours. I'm sure he'll work some 'overtime', maybe that isn't the most time in the world to you, but he should be able to produce results..
Yea he can produce results, but they might not be the best for his application. You also have to take into consideration that something may break during the event. It's very rare that someone runs their best times during the first event. Besides, i'd think he'd be putting in more than 40 hours. Hell, he isn't even finished with the car yet. So lets think here...24 hours x 7 = 168 hours a week. 168 hours - 40 = 128 hours left a week. Then you have to factor in sleep. So now where do you get off saying he has 160 hours a week?!

Originally Posted by hjholter3
Not as much as you think. The LS1 should be able to spool both effectivily with at most minor lag.
That all depends on what you consider "minor lag." I'm sure it'll be able to spool them pretty well, but there's still going to be quite a bit of lag.

Originally Posted by hjholter3
Does it need more?
For the stree? Yes.

Originally Posted by hjholter3
And how do you know this? Gas mileage is dependent on fuel maps and compression. He could LS1edit from the interior of the car to a 'streetable' set of fuel maps.
Here again, it all depends on what you consider "streetable." I don't really give a **** what you do, your not going to get great gas mileage. Besides, there's alot more to better/worse gas mileage than fuel maps anc ompression. Maybe you should go read a book or something. With the kind of power this car will make, even at a low boost setting, it'll suck the crap out of gas.

Originally Posted by hjholter3
Traction is a function of suspension and the rubber it rides on. If he was running factory skinnies, he might have traction problems, but with decent width rubber it wouldnt be something to worry about. Also the powerband isn't 'all or nothing', it's a nice curve as opposed to the spike you may be used to.
Now you do know he's running stock springs with Koni shocks right? I wouldn't consider that the best suspension option. Besides, there are many people with nice suspension setups that still have traction issues with these cars. Either way, it WOULD be something to worry about.

-Alex

Last edited by TT_Rex_7; Apr 15, 2005 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #128  
pianoprodigy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Missin' my FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Originally Posted by TT_Rex_7
First of all it was exaggerated, which I thought I made clear, guess not. Second, do you really think a 1200hp car is going to get great gas mileage or something?

-Alex
If Hinson actually chose to drive it around as a street car and didn't drive it hard (thus staying out of boost and in a considerably less rich map), I bet it would get upwards of 15 MPG if not much more depending on tuning.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #129  
TT_Rex_7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Gallatin, TN
Originally Posted by hjholter3
Displacement.
He's not running a larger displacement then factory, so that statement is void. Either way, would you really wan't to run a motor like this with something less than 93 octane? Larger displacement or not, I don't think it will help the issue that he'll need to run atleast 93 octane.

Edit: He IS running a larger displacement. See post below.

Originally Posted by hjholter3
Only when necessary
Well hopefully that's more often than what you've represented on this board!

Originally Posted by hjholter3
I could say the same to you
Right back at ya!

-Alex

Last edited by TT_Rex_7; Apr 15, 2005 at 05:40 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #130  
pianoprodigy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Missin' my FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Originally Posted by TT_Rex_7
He's not running a larger displacement then factory, so that statement is void.
Originally Posted by brianhinson on TorqueCentral.com
A high reving & low compression solid roller 372ci.
.

http://www.torquecentral.com/showpos...3&postcount=21

Last edited by pianoprodigy; Apr 15, 2005 at 05:39 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:40 PM
  #131  
TT_Rex_7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Gallatin, TN
Originally Posted by pianoprodigy
Well then I take that back, I thought it was stated in this thread that he was running stock displacement.

Either way, if he's running a larger displacement, and running 93 octane, I still say he's not going to be able to run less than 93.

-Alex
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #132  
TT_Rex_7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Gallatin, TN
Originally Posted by gnx7
Alex-

You are aware twin turbos spool faster than a single larger turbo right? Same applies from pistons to rotaries. The car unless it is under boost WILL get decent gas mileage. I'd imagine the same as rotary in town (ask my pal Dave RX-Heaven)... .

Yes, I know. I'm currently running 2 GT3071R's on my rotary. I know Rx-Heaven, I made his exhaust manifold flange for him. It will get ok gas mileage while not under boost, but still isn't going to be great or anything. I'm sure it'll still suck gas.

Originally Posted by gnx7
Hinson's car is a drag car bro.... even if he is running stock springs and Koni Yellows!.
Yes I know, but everyone is trying to say it's a street car too.

-Alex
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:47 PM
  #133  
TT_Rex_7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Gallatin, TN
Phew, i'm sick of quoting everyone! lol I think we all need to just sit back, and wait for the results. Everyone is making large accusations about this whole project, when none of us REALLY know how it's going to turn out. If all goes well, more power to him. If it doesn't, there's always next time.

About this car being "streetable," there's no point in really getting into it. "Streetable" is an opinion, not a fact.

Can't we all just get along!

-Alex
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #134  
Kevin T. Wyum's Avatar
None
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis
This is pretty funny. People are building this up to be best car ever built by anyone.

To make 1200hp on boost the motor with 0 boost is going to have to produce in the range of 500hp. Does this thing have staged injectors or something that don't come online until under boost? If not that's a pretty big range of fuel delivery. My point is that some of you are probably dreaming about getting great mileage, and we haven't even mentioned the powerglide with respect to mileage : ).

A two speed powerglide is really not very streetable either. I used to street race against people using them all the time. They pissed everyone else off because they have to putt along at 50 mph on the freeway or they'd overheat from the high revs. So when we'd go from race spot to race spot we all had to wait for the clowns with a powerglide or similar tranny or diff ratio.

If the car is really a trailer queen that's not a big deal, let's just take off the rose colored glasses and quit pretending it's everything.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #135  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
This is pretty funny. People are building this up to be best car ever built by anyone.
Well, at least it's a change from the typical 20B leg humping that goes on around here...
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 03:19 AM
  #136  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
This is pretty funny. People are building this up to be best car ever built by anyone.

To make 1200hp on boost the motor with 0 boost is going to have to produce in the range of 500hp. Does this thing have staged injectors or something that don't come online until under boost? If not that's a pretty big range of fuel delivery. My point is that some of you are probably dreaming about getting great mileage, and we haven't even mentioned the powerglide with respect to mileage : ).

This is the single greatest car EVAR! ;-)

Are you saying to get 1200 hp FI, your engine must be able to crank out 500 hp NA? I think that's what you are saying. Well, as a ratio, that's pretty obviously not true. 12:5 is the equivalent of saying "A 13brew that makes 600 hp with a t78 must be able to make 250 by itself." I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the 13b with it's 8.5:1 compression and street porting will NOT make 250hp NA. Plenty of Civics make better than 12:5 boosted-hp/NA-hp ratios.

If you meant "700 more hp" rather than the ratio argument, look into the Supra camp. I think they are trailer queens too, but they are hitting 1200hp with 3 liter motors that definitely won't do 500 NA.

Oh, and about the injector thing...that is a good point. In the pictures, I don't see any additional injectors or fuel inlets, but there does appear to be a boost dependant fuel pressure regulator. I could be wrong about that...I'm just going off what I think I am seeing in the pictures.

Whenever I get on here, I always feel like I have to be on the V8 team, and everyone else here is on the rotary team. I start wondering if I even have the right to post on this board...I don't have a rotary. Oh yeah, this is RX-7 club. That's right. That's why these V8 guys including myself are here in the first place. We are all owners of RX-7's. Fast rotary 7s are badass. Fast V8 or V6 7s are badass too. Hinson's car is not the car to end all cars, but it is pretty damn cool.

EDIT: I must add that it is late, and I am lazy. Please don't send the grammar/spelling ***** to get me.

Last edited by SpeedyWankel; Apr 21, 2005 at 03:21 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 05:50 AM
  #137  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by SpeedyWankel
Oh, and about the injector thing...that is a good point. In the pictures, I don't see any additional injectors or fuel inlets, but there does appear to be a boost dependant fuel pressure regulator. I could be wrong about that...I'm just going off what I think I am seeing in the pictures.
Why would you need additional injectors or inlets? The factory block came with 26# or 28.5# injectors. His standalone will allow the use of either high Z or low Z injectors, so he can run up to 160# injectors. You're not going to be able to see the difference that clearly with the pictures they've taken. I can tell you by looking at them that they aren't the stockers, and if I had to guess I'd et they're running 96# injectors.

Now, a little math. Assume a BSFC of 0.6 for a turbocharged application. 1200 target horsepower.

So 1200*0.6 means we need 720 # fuel per hour

8 injectors mean that at 100% duty cycle we need minimum of 90 pound injectors.

Since you'd want to run about 85% DC to be safe, that means you would want to run 105 injectors (90/0.85).

Now, the LSx fuel systems run at a base pressure of 58psi (4 bar), meaning that a 96# injector (rated at 3bar), will provide 110.9# of fuel (at 4 bar). Plenty of injector to get you to 1200. Infact, 96# injectors would theoretically support up to ~1480 hp at 100% DC. If he's worried he could always throw in some 160# injectors.

Anyhow, I doubt injectors will be the limiting factor there. He's more likely to run out of pump than injector, though I'm pretty sure he has that covered with an external pump (s).

Oh, and all of our converted cars (LS1s anyways) are running adjustable rate fuel pressure regulators. We need to run a base pressure of 58psi, and the stock LS1 fuel rail setup is a returnless system, so we have to do something to regulate the pressure. The F-bodies come with their FPR in the fuel tank, so that won't do us any good.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 08:27 AM
  #138  
pianoprodigy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Missin' my FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Originally Posted by wingsfan
He's more likely to run out of pump than injector, though I'm pretty sure he has that covered with an external pump (s).
I'd say so. I took this pic at Deal's Gap.

Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #139  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
No no no....my point wasn't that you couldn't get eight injectors big enough to handle that power. Lord, of course you can. What happens, though, when you need those same eight 110 lb/hr injectors to run at super low duty cycle, as in when you are just driving around like a grandma? Can 110 lb/hr injectors reach a duty low enough that you won't be running retarded rich?

My bad, I should have been clearer.

I know all about having the aeromotive FPR and all. The aeromotive has an small port on it that is left open to the atmosphere if you want constant pressure. If you hook it up to a pressure source, such as the intake manifold on the boosted car, I'm pretty sure it will give a 1:1 pressure increase with boost. I could be way wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #140  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by SpeedyWankel
No no no....my point wasn't that you couldn't get eight injectors big enough to handle that power. Lord, of course you can. What happens, though, when you need those same eight 110 lb/hr injectors to run at super low duty cycle, as in when you are just driving around like a grandma? Can 110 lb/hr injectors reach a duty low enough that you won't be running retarded rich?
I don't know for sure, but I'd guess it's not a huge problem. I'm sure there are tricks you can pull, especially with the engine management setup they're using. For instance, since he's running two pumps, he might only want one on under boost (which the ECU can trigger, no problem)


I know all about having the aeromotive FPR and all. The aeromotive has an small port on it that is left open to the atmosphere if you want constant pressure. If you hook it up to a pressure source, such as the intake manifold on the boosted car, I'm pretty sure it will give a 1:1 pressure increase with boost. I could be way wrong.
No, you're right. Leaving the port without a vaccum/boost reference leaves a constant (if your pump is up to it) pressure. And they're 1:1 (at least the unit I'm using is).
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 03:46 PM
  #141  
Kevin T. Wyum's Avatar
None
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis
That's not the point to a boost variable FPR. The reason is to keep the same pressure differential between the fuel in the rail and the pressure inside the manifold. If you didn't do this the ratio of pressure between the manifold and injector would be dropping as boost went up, meaning less fuel comes out of the injector for every millisecond that it's open.

As SpeedWankel mentioned already my point had nothing to do with 8 injectors being able to deliver 1200hp of fuel, it was that those same injectors probably couldn't be used at a normal street delivery volume for the 25mpg people were yapping about. That's why I said you'd need a staged setup.

Just having a second pump wouldn't resolve the problem either. The second pump would only help to maintain the appropriate pressure as the volume demands go way up with HP when you otherwise might be losing pressure as you run out of pump. Injectors are designed to run within a certain pressure range, deviate a great deal from it and you end up with messed up spray patterns or it not opening properly.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #142  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
I'll take a stab at being the amazing Kreskin here and make a few predictions...

1. He will get absolutely hammered at the Hot Rod pump gas drags and not even be close to winning. (Last minute rush jobs never work, things always break etc.)
"Hinson was not able to compete due to the charging problems on the way to the track draining the battery, but the track allowed those who were put out to run after the races were over. Brian was the first up. He ran a 9.54, but as soon as he went through the traps, the car lost oil pressure, and the rear wheels locked up sending him into the wall."



Attached Thumbnails Fastest TT FD I Have Ever Seen! ***VID***-dsc01103.jpg   Fastest TT FD I Have Ever Seen! ***VID***-dsc01104.jpg  
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 05:16 AM
  #143  
Kevin T. Wyum's Avatar
None
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis
I assume he wasn't injured. It's a shame to see someone damage a car but I can't believe how accurate I was. It'll be interesting to hear the details.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 11:08 AM
  #144  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: stl area
Jim,
you should really consider switching to a rotary again just for safety issues. When you guys use stock car engines they always make the cars go left.. i bet all you smart guys didn't know that!
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 12:02 PM
  #145  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Is the 1,000+ RWHP car finished yet?
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #146  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
It's a shame to see someone damage a car...
Absolutely. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Well, almost anyone...
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #147  
1point3liter's Avatar
Twin Turbo LSX
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 787
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, Fl
That sucks. I hate to see anyone **** up their car.

Hopefully he's alright. it doesn't look like too bad of a mishap from the pics.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 12:12 PM
  #148  
airborne's Avatar
King of the Duct Tape
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: PA
hey kevin check your email
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #149  
RX-Heven's Avatar
I'll blow it up real good
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
Any word on how/why he lost oil pressure?
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #150  
LUPE's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
From: Belleville, IL
Originally Posted by jimlab
Is the 1,000+ RWHP car finished yet?

getting really close... yours?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.