First Ever Dyno
First Ever Dyno
<http://herbstmail.com/v-web/gallery/Cars/Dyno>
Since I have no basis for comparison I don't know if this looks right or not. I'm a little surprised at how torque falls off above 6k. Sorry the line is so faint on the image.
Street Port
Blueprinted stock sequential twins
Open Intake/Downpipe/Cat-Back with stock cat
ASP Medium
Pettit Unlimited ECU
12 PSI 101 Octane
(peak RWHP reported as 281 @ 10 PSI in 3rd and 4th gear but I don't have the curves)
Any comments?
Since I have no basis for comparison I don't know if this looks right or not. I'm a little surprised at how torque falls off above 6k. Sorry the line is so faint on the image.
Street Port
Blueprinted stock sequential twins
Open Intake/Downpipe/Cat-Back with stock cat
ASP Medium
Pettit Unlimited ECU
12 PSI 101 Octane
(peak RWHP reported as 281 @ 10 PSI in 3rd and 4th gear but I don't have the curves)
Any comments?
Uh, because I can?
Seriously, I've never hooked up an O2 sensor to know how good my A/F ratios are with the Pettit maps and figured I'd rather be conservative in case of a boost spike. Sometimes I put in 91 octane but mostly run race fuel which these days is only twice as expensive. I'm thinking I may push a little above 12 PSI soon, too.
Seriously, I've never hooked up an O2 sensor to know how good my A/F ratios are with the Pettit maps and figured I'd rather be conservative in case of a boost spike. Sometimes I put in 91 octane but mostly run race fuel which these days is only twice as expensive. I'm thinking I may push a little above 12 PSI soon, too.
Originally Posted by TimH
Uh, because I can?
Seriously, I've never hooked up an O2 sensor to know how good my A/F ratios are with the Pettit maps and figured I'd rather be conservative in case of a boost spike. Sometimes I put in 91 octane but mostly run race fuel which these days is only twice as expensive. I'm thinking I may push a little above 12 PSI soon, too.
Seriously, I've never hooked up an O2 sensor to know how good my A/F ratios are with the Pettit maps and figured I'd rather be conservative in case of a boost spike. Sometimes I put in 91 octane but mostly run race fuel which these days is only twice as expensive. I'm thinking I may push a little above 12 PSI soon, too.
---only trying to help.
I don't know what my A/F is. If I knew it was always ok or rich I might be less conservative on octane. Since I fill the tank less than once a month the money doesn't matter much, and a grenaded motor would overwhelm the difference for sure.
Does high octane really produce less power?
Does high octane really produce less power?
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by TimH
I don't know what my A/F is. If I knew it was always ok or rich I might be less conservative on octane. Since I fill the tank less than once a month the money doesn't matter much, and a grenaded motor would overwhelm the difference for sure.
Does high octane really produce less power?
Does high octane really produce less power?
I'ts kind of like retarding your timimg. You will be safer (less chance of detonation) but you will make less power because of the later ignition which is similar to higher octane in the sence that your complete combustion will occur later. I hope this helps.
Originally Posted by t-von
Your avatar is insane.
What is that?
What is that?
So, if I understand this correctly, I could expect a faster burn with lower octane, with an effect sorta like more spark advance. Might that prevent the torque rolloff I'm seeing at high RPM?
I'm guessing spark issues wouldn't give such a smooth rolloff...
I'm guessing spark issues wouldn't give such a smooth rolloff...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eddierotary
Engine Management Forum
16
Oct 4, 2016 08:22 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM






