Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

Finally! BNR Stage 3 high boost dyno results

Old Jul 11, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #26  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by fastcarfreak
Cost is much less, and they make about the same power as a T78. Well worth it if you ask me.
You're kiddin' right ???

A Greddy T78 will out spool them and out flow them!!!!

Greddy will easily handle boost up to 30psi if not more and ~500rwh.

JD
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #27  
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 7
From: Home of the Rolex 24
Originally Posted by dubulup
are you seeing max boost ~5200?

seems like the air path of twins make dyno plots a little wavey???
Is this in regards to the bnr's or also stock twins? My power curve is smooth as silk to redline..(stockers non-seq @ 15 psi) You think the fuel pump can be causing the inconsistency (stock wiring)? Mine is relayed..
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #28  
darkphantom's Avatar
The king of the highway!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,988
Likes: 0
From: Home of the 305 Boyz(miami)
BADASS NUMBERS FROM THE BNR'S. is that sequential. you should be able to do at least 16psi on pump gas with good tunning
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #29  
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 7
From: Home of the Rolex 24
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
thanks T. I think your FD is going to have an insane powerband, something like 3000 to 8000 . I still have the stock pump wiring, but I think that would manifest itself in a pressure issue, which we didn't experience.
Finally! Great #'s Rich... What psi and what octane are you going to run on the street? Get the fuel pump relayed!!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #30  
fastcarfreak's Avatar
3rd motors a charm I hope
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Central New York
Originally Posted by Boostn7
You're kiddin' right ???

A Greddy T78 will out spool them and out flow them!!!!

Greddy will easily handle boost up to 30psi if not more and ~500rwh.

JD

I agree that the t78 will handle 30 psi, but most people wont ever even touch 20 psi. I rode in rich's car and my t78 definately is no faster spooling then the bnr twins. At the boost level in question, they are very evenly matched. If your looking to run more boost, then the t78 is the better choice, but if you dont plan on going any higher then this, no reason not to use the bnr turbos.

Adam
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #31  
FD Rey's Avatar
I brake boost
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Good numbers indeed. Time to update your sig Rich!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #32  
F1blueRx7's Avatar
Couldn't stay away
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,093
Likes: 160
From: Defuniak Springs, FL
OH... That was your car at rotorfest? Neat. Great job.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #33  
karken29's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 1
From: Morristown, NJ
Thumbs up

On the way back from the rotor fest when we got on Rt 80 Rich got into it and he rapidly closed the distance between us. This got me thinking.... I wonder what his HP to Weight ratio is. If you start with a stock curb weight of 2750 Lbs.... factor in a conservative weight loss of 150 Lbs, which would account for the alllll the delete you've done and do the math based on his latest HP figures... that would put him some where around 6.175Lbs to 1 HP ratop.... Jeeze.... no wonder you crawled up my tailpipe sooooooo fast !!!

Better get an FAA Certificate for this beast!

Last edited by karken29; Jul 11, 2005 at 05:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #34  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by rotorbrain
dude, thats nice. . . the part about the injectors scares me, though. . . i have the same configuration. if i dont hit 400rwhp with my car because of these stupid fuel injectors. . . my car will have a brand new dent!!!!!

oh, and btw rich. . . you gotta fill me in on how that desert feels. . . cause it looks like ill be experiencing it before the years over. :/
Hey Paul,

don't worry about the injector discrepancy. I really need to get to a dynojet for my own piece of mind on that subject.

re: iraq, pm me. A five minute phone conversation will increase your chances of survival ten fold.

Rich
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:30 PM
  #35  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by Boostn7
Congrats Rich !!!
Nice numbers :-)

Depending on your base fuel pressure your injectors should flow up to ~480rwh close to 95-100% inj duty.

No full boost 'till ~5200rpm !!!!

Boost looks unstable as well going by your torque curve.

If you're still using the Mazda turbine housings I believe you will/are at the limit of flow thru them....no matter what compressor.
Thanks John .

I agree with your fuel info. Something is odd with the results, 420 shouldnt correlate to almost 100% FID.

You are right on with regard to boost, it spiked then dropped down a bit and fluctuated as well. I am running an ancient profec b. Perhaps switching to something more up to date will help......
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:32 PM
  #36  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by Boostn7
You're kiddin' right ???

A Greddy T78 will out spool them and out flow them!!!!

Greddy will easily handle boost up to 30psi if not more and ~500rwh.

JD
Pretty sure he was referring to pump gas levels. Steve has maintained for awhile now that at sub 17 psi level the two turbo setups are very comparable. Hell, the base map that he loaded into my car about 6 weeks ago was for a T78 car and up to one bar my FD felt smooth and powerful .
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #37  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by darkphantom
BADASS NUMBERS FROM THE BNR'S. is that sequential. you should be able to do at least 16psi on pump gas with good tunning
thanks man . That is setup parallel, thus lack of an immediate boost response. I agree, 16 psi should yield around 400 rwhp which is what I wanted all along on pump gas
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #38  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by dubulup
are you seeing max boost ~5200?

seems like the air path of twins make dyno plots a little wavey???
yup, that is what the dynapack showed. I am interested to see if it is the same on the street.....next time I merge on the highway I will pay close attention to my boost gauge
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:40 PM
  #39  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by fastcarfreak
I agree that the t78 will handle 30 psi, but most people wont ever even touch 20 psi. I rode in rich's car and my t78 definately is no faster spooling then the bnr twins. At the boost level in question, they are very evenly matched. If your looking to run more boost, then the t78 is the better choice, but if you dont plan on going any higher then this, no reason not to use the bnr turbos.

Adam
thanks Adam, it's great to get an alternate real-world viewpoint on all of this .
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #40  
Tim Benton's Avatar
FD title holder since 94
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 37
From: Cedartown, Ga
Just for clarification, the y axis says flywheel torque, so the hp is being measured from at the flywheel...correct? If so, then RWHP would be less. I've never used this type dyno, so I was just wondering if that is what it means. That would put it back down into the 360 to 370 rwhp range on the 420 flywheel run. The dynopack the kind that to take your wheels off and hook it up? If so, they should be able to switch parameters and tell you what the rwhp was on those runs.

Am I off base with this?

Tim

Last edited by Tim Benton; Jul 11, 2005 at 05:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #41  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by Tim Benton
Just for clarification, the y axis says flywheel torque, so the hp is also from at the flywheel...correct? If so, then RWHP would be less. I've never used this type dyno, so I was just wondering if that is what it means. That would put it back down into the 360 to 370 rwhp range on the 420 flywheel run.

Am I off base with this?

Tim
Good catch Tim. I was wondering the same thing myself but this was such a crazy weekend the issue got lost in the shuffle (dynoing until 2am will do that do you, lol.)

I just got off the phone with Jay from Car Version 2, who is the owner and dyno operator. He assured me that the #s on the graph are rear wheel and not flywheel, and that they are comparable to a dynojet, if not a bit lower. As to why in the hell it says 'flywheel torque' rather than 'rearwheel torque' is some kind of a glitch in the program that they can't change . At any rate, the #s are all rear wheel, which is the important thing. Looks like close to 500 motor hp and 400 motor torque at 17.5 psi .

Rich
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #42  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Dynapack's frequently read 10% less than Dynojets....although settings can be tweaked to eliminate this I'm sure. You could be making more than 420....
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #43  
Tim Benton's Avatar
FD title holder since 94
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 37
From: Cedartown, Ga
Glad to hear but also a little envious First we have beautiful car pictures in a thread, now 420+ rwhp, it's getting a little to much to handle. Try to spread the love out over a longer period of time so we can enjoy it more.

Tim
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:32 PM
  #44  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by Tim Benton
Glad to hear but also a little envious First we have beautiful car pictures in a thread, now 420+ rwhp, it's getting a little to much to handle. Try to spread the love out over a longer period of time so we can enjoy it more.

Tim
Hey, what can I say, lol. I've been waiting for this for about 3 years now. Trust me, LOTS of money, time, blood sweat and tears went into this car. I can tell you horror stories.....it's about time some good rotary karma came my way .

Rich

Last edited by GoodfellaFD3S; Jul 11, 2005 at 08:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #45  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by FD Rey
Good numbers indeed. Time to update your sig Rich!
Yeah, good call, lol.

Also, I forgot to list the power fc in my mods list. can't forget about engine management, hehe.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:48 PM
  #46  
2-Rotor's Avatar
Garaged
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 651
Likes: 1
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by Tim Benton
Glad to hear but also a little envious First we have beautiful car pictures in a thread, now 420+ rwhp, it's getting a little to much to handle. Try to spread the love out over a longer period of time so we can enjoy it more.

Tim

LOL !!!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 10:13 PM
  #47  
rebuild FD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: ___, USA
this may be old news, but I thought it was worth posting (from Chuck Westbrook)

Note that the stock wiring suffers from voltage drop which limits capacity of stock or aftermarket pumps. Re-wiring the pump with heavy gage wire for full battery voltage will provide a huge improvement in fuel delivery. This trick to up the voltage can be taken to the extreme with aftermarket boost-a-pump electronics that further increase voltage under boost.

the wiring on these cars is total crap, let's face it
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 10:56 PM
  #48  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
congrats Rich....what a beast!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #49  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by fastcarfreak
I agree that the t78 will handle 30 psi, but most people wont ever even touch 20 psi. I rode in rich's car and my t78 definately is no faster spooling then the bnr twins. At the boost level in question, they are very evenly matched. If your looking to run more boost, then the t78 is the better choice, but if you dont plan on going any higher then this, no reason not to use the bnr turbos.

Adam
Sorry, but I have a T88 FD which hits full boost that late.......T78's come on much earlier and are alot more efficient at lower boost. The Greddy T78 will make more hp all around and continue up to 30psi+.
Full boost @ ~5200 is "big-turbo" territory !!!
As far as the BNR's.....they are performing well *but* their only issue is those stock turbines.....I've been saying this since the 1st set of BNRs !!!! _ they could only flow X amount exhaust no matter how big those compressor/turbine wheels are before generating too much back pressure between motor and turbo where hp hits a brick wall.


Rich: If your fuel pump is not wired here's a little trick.

Run a thick gauge wire (10 gauge) to the pump from the battery fused. Have it power up thru a relay which gets its turn signal signal from the "speed relay" white/red wire. The fuel pump "speed" relay is in the relay box near the fans and latch. This white/red wire only comes on with load or 0psi +.
Therefore @ idle and cruising pump will only see ~9 volts and then battery voltage when under boost:-)

Do not use boost-a-pump with higher voltage on those Supra pumps....they will not last !!!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #50  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by Boostn7
Rich: If your fuel pump is not wired here's a little trick.

Run a thick gauge wire (10 gauge) to the pump from the battery fused. Have it power up thru a relay which gets its turn signal signal from the "speed relay" white/red wire. The fuel pump "speed" relay is in the relay box near the fans and latch. This white/red wire only comes on with load or 0psi +.
Therefore @ idle and cruising pump will only see ~9 volts and then battery voltage when under boost:-)

Do not use boost-a-pump with higher voltage on those Supra pumps....they will not last !!!
Great info JD, thanks a bunch!
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.