Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

Dynoed the new BNR Twins on Low Boost

Old Oct 16, 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #51  
RX7Crazy_84's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: vancouver BC
Originally Posted by kwikrx7
Nice numbers, Rich. I figured Bryan had something up his sleeve sooner or later. I never ran over 15 psi on pump but know that you all have pushed the envelope. Hopefully these new BNRs will put down a consistent 380-400 rwhp at 15 psi. Good luck with the new setup

soo what kind of gas do you run after 15psi?i think thats what you are talking about when you mentioned "pump" sorry still learning guys.. about to get my FD soon soo i need to learn alots still...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2004 | 09:49 PM
  #52  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,818
Likes: 656
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Pump is 93 octane. I have run as much as 17 psi on pump, but it's too close to the edge in my opinion. Apex seals break. Anything more, I plan on running c16 (116 octane race gas). Being in NJ now I run Sunoco 94 Octane exclusively for added protection.

Rich
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2004 | 09:54 PM
  #53  
RX7Crazy_84's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: vancouver BC
serious i neva even heard of 116octane where would u get it from?well where i live never heard of it man..
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2004 | 10:06 PM
  #54  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Being in NJ now I run Sunoco 94 Octane exclusively for added protection.
Rich, don't take Sunoco 94 for granted! I've used Sunoco 94 for almost 2 years now, then, right about the time you moved back to Jersey, the Sunocos down here got rid of 94, and stuck w/ Ultra 93. So I'm back to 'the norm' now
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 12:04 AM
  #55  
Max13BREW's Avatar
FDrx7.com
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
Just a simple few questions from another noobie..

I have a 1998 FD (Australian Spec..)

Looking at throwing upgraded twins, and leaving them as sequential.

We run on 98 octane pump down here in the Southern Hemisphere.

With a stock engine, HKS DP, High Flow Cat, Racing Beat Twin CB (Or similar), Vmount or water to air cooler, fuel and ECU. what kind of power/times would i be looking at? Would the BNR's be the best for a twin sequential? Or would i be better off throwing some BB aftermarket turbo's and external gates on?
Sorry for dumb questions..But i have been searching the forum for about 2 weeks now *grin*
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 01:40 AM
  #56  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,818
Likes: 656
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by Max13BREW
Just a simple few questions from another noobie..

I have a 1998 FD (Australian Spec..)

Looking at throwing upgraded twins, and leaving them as sequential.

We run on 98 octane pump down here in the Southern Hemisphere.

With a stock engine, HKS DP, High Flow Cat, Racing Beat Twin CB (Or similar), Vmount or water to air cooler, fuel and ECU. what kind of power/times would i be looking at? Would the BNR's be the best for a twin sequential? Or would i be better off throwing some BB aftermarket turbo's and external gates on?
Sorry for dumb questions..But i have been searching the forum for about 2 weeks now *grin*
The BNRs will be a hell of a lot cheaper than the alternative you have listed. I think it'll do the trick for you.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 04:46 AM
  #57  
Max13BREW's Avatar
FDrx7.com
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
From what I can see we are talking around $2000 difference ..small change considering the amount I am looking at spending.

Is there going to be much difference between the two (Besides somewhat shorter spool times on the BB units...)
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 10:49 AM
  #58  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,818
Likes: 656
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
The BNRs will be much more of a bolt up affair, and will give more of a stock/sleeper look. Also will be much cheaper to repair when you shoot an apex seal chunk through the turbine.

Also, BNRs run sequentially will give more low end than just about any decent-sized BB single, while still pulling like a freight train to redline.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #59  
SPOautos's Avatar
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
From: Bimingham, AL
Originally Posted by RX7Crazy_84
serious i neva even heard of 116octane where would u get it from?well where i live never heard of it man..
There is a gas station about 5 minutes from my house where I can pick up some 119 for $5.50 a gallon

Not to many people can say that

Stephen
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 05:31 AM
  #60  
Max13BREW's Avatar
FDrx7.com
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
The BNRs will be much more of a bolt up affair, and will give more of a stock/sleeper look. Also will be much cheaper to repair when you shoot an apex seal chunk through the turbine.

Also, BNRs run sequentially will give more low end than just about any decent-sized BB single, while still pulling like a freight train to redline.

Pulling like a freight train...yep sounds good..

How would bolting TWIN BB's onto the factory manifold go? Smaller BB's obviously maybe GT28R sized? Using adapter platers as necessary and either integral WG or modifying the factory actuators to blow external gates?

Basically I am chasing 10's..but don't wish to start spending $$ until i have the route mapped out. High 10's with minimal to no lag would be brilliant.. Reasonable amounts of cash is not a problem.

My main problem is my local dealers mainly deal in old school Rotors. Most australian quick rotors are still using 10 year old technology.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 12:33 AM
  #61  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,818
Likes: 656
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Bump so that I don't have to answer so many PMs
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 01:19 AM
  #62  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Aren't you Mr. Popular, eh?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 14, 2015 04:48 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.