Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

The Official FC Wheel Fitment Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-10, 08:08 PM
  #4701  
4th string e-armchair QB

iTrader: (11)
 
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Josh18_2k
fyi, 285/40/17 is a pretty tall tire and will hit the front of the fender well right at/above the moulding when the susp compresses. 275 is hit or miss there. if trot's car doesnt have that problem, hes probably not very low lol
The difference between a 285/40R17 and 2745/40R17 is 1/3" (8mm), not that big a deal. My car is still on stock suspension, so no it's not very low. But it doesn't make much of a difference, bottoming out stock suspension or lowered stiffer springs have the same effect. I've had to bang it out and pull it out with a baseball bat a few times after finding different places that were rubbing.

Here's the deal, the Tein suspension will give you more clearance on the inside, and the 20mm overfender will give you more clearance on the outside. You could try the +18 offset like mine. I'll try diggin up a picture of my wheels.
Old 09-13-10, 10:07 PM
  #4702  
Junior Member

 
gready123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: trinidad and tobago
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by J.T.P.
sytfu FC3's car is at my shop getting a haltech installed along with a new fuel system, ls-1 coils, full tune, etc... he asked me to figure out some good wheel fitments for some new wheels for him... this looks to be just right...


damn what offset are those ?????? this looks very sexy on that car man
Old 09-13-10, 10:11 PM
  #4703  
Full Member

 
2red1986rx7s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: cali
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trots*88TII-AE*
The difference between a 285/40R17 and 2745/40R17 is 1/3" (8mm), not that big a deal. My car is still on stock suspension, so no it's not very low. But it doesn't make much of a difference, bottoming out stock suspension or lowered stiffer springs have the same effect. I've had to bang it out and pull it out with a baseball bat a few times after finding different places that were rubbing.

Here's the deal, the Tein suspension will give you more clearance on the inside, and the 20mm overfender will give you more clearance on the outside. You could try the +18 offset like mine. I'll try diggin up a picture of my wheels.
That would be great man
Old 09-14-10, 06:47 PM
  #4704  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (3)
 
Josh18_2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gresham, OR
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Trots*88TII-AE*
The difference between a 285/40R17 and 2745/40R17 is 1/3" (8mm), not that big a deal. My car is still on stock suspension, so no it's not very low. But it doesn't make much of a difference, bottoming out stock suspension or lowered stiffer springs have the same effect. I've had to bang it out and pull it out with a baseball bat a few times after finding different places that were rubbing.
took some pics to help elaborate.

when i cut out my fenders, i cut all the way down to the moulding, and grinded a little bit of hte material off along the back edge of the moulding area. probably not a measurable amount, but you can kinda tell in the pics that theres a curve to the back edge now where some metal is missing.

i run 315/35/17 kumho v710's, which are the exact same height as 275/40/17's (and therefore 8mm shorter than a 285). as you can sorta see, i have rubber all along the back edge of the moulding area. the tire eats through the zip tie every couple of autox's.
FWIW i have spherical control arm bearings, so its not just from old-bushing flex.

PS, ignore the gay wheels lol. thems drift spares for this weekend.


Old 09-16-10, 05:33 AM
  #4705  
rear wheel steering

iTrader: (3)
 
Red_Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Shelton wa
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i might be getting some 17x12.5 i dunno what the offset is but with how wide they are what offset could i get away with? that is without rubbing on suspension. (ground control sleeve overs)
Old 09-17-10, 06:11 AM
  #4706  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by MaczPayne
I'm running 17x9 +17 all around. I'm running a square tire setup because it's easier to sort out the handling without having to compensate for differing widths of tire. I can also rotate the tires to get the most use out of them.
Ah, this is good news. I may not end up with the 18x8 +45's, the seller's being dumb. However I found some 17x9 +20's. I think I'd be happier with those.
Old 09-23-10, 04:09 PM
  #4707  
Wild Bill Certified

iTrader: (2)
 
Wild Bill Massey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ebensburg, Pennsylvania
Posts: 264
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Finally got my wheels and tires on.

Ended up going with 17x7 w/ 245/45 at all the corners.
Old 09-24-10, 12:30 AM
  #4708  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (2)
 
K!NCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,564
Received 25 Likes on 14 Posts
I've been looking into Varrstoens. I wish they made a 17 or at least and 18x9 +22

Will a 18x9 +15 fit on all corners with about -2.5 camber in the front and -1~ in the back. All my camber is adjustable.
Old 09-25-10, 12:59 AM
  #4709  
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
10yearrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: in my car
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got my wheels on today. 17x8 +35 front and 17x9 +43 rear. They fit perfectly with no fender roll and no rubbing. The rears are a little close to lower control arm, maybe 1/8th to 1/4 inch but I do not think it is anything to worry about. Tires are 235/40/17 front 255/40/17 rear. I'll post pics tomorow or somethin'
Old 09-25-10, 01:36 AM
  #4710  
Space cadet

iTrader: (78)
 
Battle Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: LOS ANGELES
Posts: 10,308
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i think i need wide body ffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuu


Old 09-25-10, 11:16 AM
  #4711  
new paint

 
DC13B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durham,NC
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
holy shiat
Old 09-28-10, 12:06 PM
  #4712  
Boxer with a Rotor
iTrader: (8)
 
XIEmperorIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I'm a little confused on what will and won't fit with this car so I figured I would go ahead and ask..been searching and I'm still a little confused..

from what I read...

17x8 +25 front and 17x9 +17 rear should clear the suspension and work with the stock body fine or would some rolling be required? Going to be dropping the car on stance coilovers soon..not sure how low I'll actually be going yet though.

Sorry...so much info in this thread it was making my head spin haha
Old 09-28-10, 12:37 PM
  #4713  
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
10yearrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: in my car
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From my experience you will need to roll fenders. Unless you are going with 215 fronts and 235 rears, it might work. I think 17x8 +35 is perfect for the front and 17x9 +35 is perfect for the rear with no roll or pull. I have 17x8 +35 f and 17x9 +43 rear and it is perfect but the rears could come out a little safely.
Old 09-28-10, 01:04 PM
  #4714  
Boxer with a Rotor
iTrader: (8)
 
XIEmperorIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks man! That clears things up a bit. I don't necessarily mind having to roll my fenders but I just keep seeing different things in this thread it was throwing me of :P
Old 09-28-10, 02:31 PM
  #4715  
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
10yearrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: in my car
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No problem

Here is a pic of my set-up so you can get an idea. 17x8 +35 235/40/17 f and 17x9 +43 255/40/17 r

Name:  newwheels.jpg
Views: 378
Size:  73.5 KB

Last edited by 10yearrx7; 09-28-10 at 02:36 PM.
Old 09-28-10, 09:35 PM
  #4716  
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
10yearrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: in my car
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Name:  newpics086.jpg
Views: 390
Size:  74.4 KB

Name:  newpics090.jpg
Views: 367
Size:  85.2 KB

Name:  newpics089.jpg
Views: 346
Size:  100.6 KB

Name:  newpics092.jpg
Views: 386
Size:  116.9 KB
Old 09-29-10, 08:44 PM
  #4717  
Junior Member
 
Dattosan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good, how well does it clear? Any Rubbing?
Old 09-29-10, 10:40 PM
  #4718  
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
10yearrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: in my car
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanx. So far so good. only about an 1/8th inch clearance in many different places but I think thats fine. Every one told me the rears would not fit but they did, apparently. lol
Old 10-06-10, 12:17 PM
  #4719  
Junior Member

 
cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: peoria IL
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about a 17x9 +33 with a 275/40/17 BFG DR on the rear?
Old 10-06-10, 12:43 PM
  #4720  
4th string e-armchair QB

iTrader: (11)
 
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it should work with minor fender work. It will be very close to the stock suspension though... A 10" wheel with +18 offset will work better, as the tire will fit the wheel better, maybe giving a better contact patch...
Old 10-07-10, 10:13 PM
  #4721  
- Make Haste -

 
Archangels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
17 x 7 +34 (225/45/17)
17 x 8 +35 (255/40/17)

what do you guy's think of this fitment on a 1989 FC Turbo.
Old 10-07-10, 11:27 PM
  #4722  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (2)
 
K!NCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,564
Received 25 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Archangels
17 x 7 +34 (225/45/17)
17 x 8 +35 (255/40/17)

what do you guy's think of this fitment on a 1989 FC Turbo.
It'll fit just fine maybe a small spacer make to make it a bit more flush if you want.
Old 10-08-10, 01:03 AM
  #4723  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (3)
 
Josh18_2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gresham, OR
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
tires are kinda big for the wheels. that setup would be better suited to 17x8/9. but yah, offsets are spot on
Old 10-08-10, 11:59 PM
  #4724  
Senior Member

iTrader: (12)
 
AaronJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Do you guys think 17x10 with 255s can be done with 25mm fenders
Old 10-09-10, 02:02 PM
  #4725  
HKS obsessed

iTrader: (7)
 
blackedoutFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OP, KS
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.gtfactory.jp/cms/e107_plu...opic.php?233.0

Maybe I missed it, but I can't find out what tires this guys runnin when he rolls his fenders again. Just wondering what size rears he's running if anybody knows? His names Martin and his FC has the nicest roll I've ever seen on the rear quarters.


Quick Reply: The Official FC Wheel Fitment Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.