Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

FD Rear 315/30r18's!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-12, 10:50 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
J-RnsxT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So this fitment is good with +44. Whts the max on the front without any rubbing issue?
Old 07-20-12, 11:40 PM
  #27  
abc
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
abc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zhé
do you have any more pictures of the setup? from different angles and distance?
I'll get some pics loaded tomorrow......max front that I'm running is 275's with rolled fenders and slightly shaved lower control arms. The plastic inner lining will rub a little at max turns....no biggie
Old 07-26-12, 07:59 AM
  #28  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
s4vagguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats a pretty nice fitment with not that much poke
Old 07-27-12, 10:57 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
Hines157's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Livermore
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CCW are well crafted
Old 07-27-12, 11:07 PM
  #30  
Junior Member

 
Ngan Sik Lung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks great.
Old 08-02-12, 04:57 PM
  #31  
FD + 2JZGTE = WIN! **D

iTrader: (19)
 
YoshiFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: King George, VA USA
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm!

I wonder if my 295/35/19's on 19X10.5's 38-offset will fit then..
Old 08-02-12, 07:03 PM
  #32  
abc
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
abc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its worth a shot, it may just stick out a bit only.....got some crappy pics the other day. I'll take some more before posting.

Name:  DSC05755.jpg
Views: 1810
Size:  34.5 KB
Name:  DSC05757-1.jpg
Views: 812
Size:  25.5 KB


Here the fronts are still sunken inwards about 1/2" or so.....the wheel build should of have been done with a 10.5" instead of a 10.0".
Name:  DSC05614-3.jpg
Views: 796
Size:  31.4 KB

Last edited by abc; 08-02-12 at 07:18 PM.
Old 08-02-12, 08:10 PM
  #33  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,214
Received 764 Likes on 506 Posts
I wonder if my 295/35/19's on 19X10.5's 38-offset will fit then..

as I found +38 offset fits 265 with front camber and lip rolled under and rear 265 with 1.6 deg camber stock fender barely fits (rubs letters on sidewall).

Gonna need more massaging of body to fit anything bigger than 265 on +38.
Old 11-18-12, 03:57 AM
  #34  
Senior Member

 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Based on abc's info that the Falken 615's will work, I doubt the Pilot PS2's will. The Falken's and Kuhmo's have a tread width of 11.7 & 11.5 respectively. The PS2 has a tread width of 12.5. All of these are with the 315/30-18 size.

The Kuhmo's are the cheapest by about $100 at this size. I use them on my 17x8 wheels with a 255/40-17 and have no complaints except that they are about 6lbs heavier than the PS2's.

I'll be giving the XS's a try on my CCW SP500 18x10's in the back next time. CCW told me that the 10" SP500's are actually closer to a 10.5 so I shouldn't have any issues. The 285/30-18 Sumitomo's on there now actually look a tad stretched. Perfect for the front but too small for the back.
Old 11-19-12, 04:17 AM
  #35  
raawwwwrf

iTrader: (2)
 
Zhé's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 839
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
tirerack has a "section width" and a "tread width"
which of these determines the full width of the tire after being mounted to the rim?
i thought section width was the one, and the one we should look at for measuring whether wheel/tire setup will fit or not?
if so, falken tires website does not list the section width for the 615k's and their "tread width" listed (11.7") would only equate to 297mm wide

ABC, perhaps you can manually measure the widest part of the 315 wheel/tire and get back to us on exactly how wide it is?

oh crap, edit: falken tires does list the section width, which is 12.6
Old 11-19-12, 04:34 AM
  #36  
Senior Member

 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
I think the section width is the widest part of the tire including the sidewall. This would change based on the rim used(but never less than tread width). The tread-width is the part that contacts the ground and wouldn't vary much at all. I pulled the widths off of Falken's site as they weren't all listed on tirerack.

Assuming full travel of the suspension the section width would be important to determine if a tire will rub on the fender. A rounded tire, however, may fit better due to the movement of the suspension and it increasing negative camber when compressed.

It seems the Michelin's get you more contact with the ground for a given overall width.
Old 11-19-12, 02:35 PM
  #37  
Mac Attack

iTrader: (5)
 
MaczPayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,668
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
I also concur that the RT615's ran narrower than the next tire I used (AD07's)
Old 12-03-12, 12:39 AM
  #38  
abc
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
abc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zhé
tirerack has a "section width" and a "tread width"
which of these determines the full width of the tire after being mounted to the rim?
i thought section width was the one, and the one we should look at for measuring whether wheel/tire setup will fit or not?
if so, falken tires website does not list the section width for the 615k's and their "tread width" listed (11.7") would only equate to 297mm wide

ABC, perhaps you can manually measure the widest part of the 315 wheel/tire and get back to us on exactly how wide it is?

oh crap, edit: falken tires does list the section width, which is 12.6
Haven't been checking on this thread lately. Let me confirm your findings to see if the width is 12.6. I'll measure it and post it up for future reference to the rest of the members that may be interested.

The PS2 tires are very nice, but cost too much for my purpose. BFG Drags/NT01 will be my next setup when the Falkens are used up.
Old 12-14-12, 10:56 PM
  #39  
Junior Member
 
Haedoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Evansville,in
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks sweet
Old 12-15-12, 12:26 PM
  #40  
Time or Money, Pick one

iTrader: (37)
 
silverTRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Torrance, ca.
Posts: 3,353
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
this is a very inspiring thread indeed.
Old 01-17-13, 10:14 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
ringo_rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Thailand
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
niceeee
Old 02-04-13, 04:06 PM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
wes1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: georgia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great looking wheel/tire
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
08-17-15 09:36 AM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
08-13-15 11:19 AM



Quick Reply: FD Rear 315/30r18's!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.