Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

FD Rear 315/30r18's!!!

Old Jul 20, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #26  
J-RnsxT's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
So this fitment is good with +44. Whts the max on the front without any rubbing issue?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 11:40 PM
  #27  
abc's Avatar
abc
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Central
Originally Posted by Zhé
do you have any more pictures of the setup? from different angles and distance?
I'll get some pics loaded tomorrow......max front that I'm running is 275's with rolled fenders and slightly shaved lower control arms. The plastic inner lining will rub a little at max turns....no biggie
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2012 | 07:59 AM
  #28  
s4vagguy's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: NJ
thats a pretty nice fitment with not that much poke
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 10:57 PM
  #29  
Hines157's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Livermore
CCW are well crafted
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 11:07 PM
  #30  
Ngan Sik Lung's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Looks great.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 04:57 PM
  #31  
YoshiFD3S's Avatar
FD + 2JZGTE = WIN! **D
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: King George, VA USA
Hmm!

I wonder if my 295/35/19's on 19X10.5's 38-offset will fit then..
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 07:03 PM
  #32  
abc's Avatar
abc
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Central
Its worth a shot, it may just stick out a bit only.....got some crappy pics the other day. I'll take some more before posting.

Name:  DSC05755.jpg
Views: 2148
Size:  34.5 KB
Name:  DSC05757-1.jpg
Views: 961
Size:  25.5 KB


Here the fronts are still sunken inwards about 1/2" or so.....the wheel build should of have been done with a 10.5" instead of a 10.0".
Name:  DSC05614-3.jpg
Views: 959
Size:  31.4 KB

Last edited by abc; Aug 2, 2012 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 08:10 PM
  #33  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
I wonder if my 295/35/19's on 19X10.5's 38-offset will fit then..

as I found +38 offset fits 265 with front camber and lip rolled under and rear 265 with 1.6 deg camber stock fender barely fits (rubs letters on sidewall).

Gonna need more massaging of body to fit anything bigger than 265 on +38.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2012 | 03:57 AM
  #34  
Exidous's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 473
Likes: 10
From: San Antonio
Based on abc's info that the Falken 615's will work, I doubt the Pilot PS2's will. The Falken's and Kuhmo's have a tread width of 11.7 & 11.5 respectively. The PS2 has a tread width of 12.5. All of these are with the 315/30-18 size.

The Kuhmo's are the cheapest by about $100 at this size. I use them on my 17x8 wheels with a 255/40-17 and have no complaints except that they are about 6lbs heavier than the PS2's.

I'll be giving the XS's a try on my CCW SP500 18x10's in the back next time. CCW told me that the 10" SP500's are actually closer to a 10.5 so I shouldn't have any issues. The 285/30-18 Sumitomo's on there now actually look a tad stretched. Perfect for the front but too small for the back.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 04:17 AM
  #35  
Zhé's Avatar
raawwwwrf
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 839
Likes: 10
From: Toronto
tirerack has a "section width" and a "tread width"
which of these determines the full width of the tire after being mounted to the rim?
i thought section width was the one, and the one we should look at for measuring whether wheel/tire setup will fit or not?
if so, falken tires website does not list the section width for the 615k's and their "tread width" listed (11.7") would only equate to 297mm wide

ABC, perhaps you can manually measure the widest part of the 315 wheel/tire and get back to us on exactly how wide it is?

oh crap, edit: falken tires does list the section width, which is 12.6
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 04:34 AM
  #36  
Exidous's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 473
Likes: 10
From: San Antonio
I think the section width is the widest part of the tire including the sidewall. This would change based on the rim used(but never less than tread width). The tread-width is the part that contacts the ground and wouldn't vary much at all. I pulled the widths off of Falken's site as they weren't all listed on tirerack.

Assuming full travel of the suspension the section width would be important to determine if a tire will rub on the fender. A rounded tire, however, may fit better due to the movement of the suspension and it increasing negative camber when compressed.

It seems the Michelin's get you more contact with the ground for a given overall width.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 02:35 PM
  #37  
MaczPayne's Avatar
Mac Attack
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 22
From: California
I also concur that the RT615's ran narrower than the next tire I used (AD07's)
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2012 | 12:39 AM
  #38  
abc's Avatar
abc
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Central
Originally Posted by Zhé
tirerack has a "section width" and a "tread width"
which of these determines the full width of the tire after being mounted to the rim?
i thought section width was the one, and the one we should look at for measuring whether wheel/tire setup will fit or not?
if so, falken tires website does not list the section width for the 615k's and their "tread width" listed (11.7") would only equate to 297mm wide

ABC, perhaps you can manually measure the widest part of the 315 wheel/tire and get back to us on exactly how wide it is?

oh crap, edit: falken tires does list the section width, which is 12.6
Haven't been checking on this thread lately. Let me confirm your findings to see if the width is 12.6. I'll measure it and post it up for future reference to the rest of the members that may be interested.

The PS2 tires are very nice, but cost too much for my purpose. BFG Drags/NT01 will be my next setup when the Falkens are used up.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 10:56 PM
  #39  
Haedoken's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Evansville,in
Looks sweet
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2012 | 12:26 PM
  #40  
silverTRD's Avatar
Time or Money, Pick one
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 169
From: Torrance, ca.
this is a very inspiring thread indeed.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 10:14 PM
  #41  
ringo_rx7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Thailand
niceeee
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2013 | 04:06 PM
  #42  
wes1023's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Great looking wheel/tire
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Aug 17, 2015 09:36 AM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Aug 13, 2015 11:19 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.