Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

turbo too big?? 1.32 hot side

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-08, 06:07 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Spannersrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
turbo too big?? 1.32 hot side

I have just been offered a t04 garret that has .60 compressor and 1.32. im only thinking about upgrading from my hybrid as im losing boost at higher rpm. starts dropping around 4000 from 12.5psi to 10 psi by 6000.

Just wondering if this will cause me too much lag?

any help or advise would be great.. turbo is dirt cheap
Old 06-04-08, 11:34 AM
  #2  
FC Mobsta

 
marcus219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Stock port engine? what engine is it? a little more info would be nice...:-p
Old 06-04-08, 10:14 PM
  #3  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Spannersrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
s4 motor, extend port, microtech, 500hp fuel pump, 660 secondarys, aftermarket gtr fmic, light flywheel, full 3 inch exhaust no cat
Old 06-04-08, 10:44 PM
  #4  
Back at it again!!

iTrader: (3)
 
2Lucky2tha7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very laggy and annoying in a street car. Tried it before. So, the exhaust housing of the turbo was swapped for a Turbonetics .81 exhaust housing. You can get one for about $150.
.96 is pretty much the norm.
Old 06-04-08, 11:18 PM
  #5  
marky

 
peachykeenwight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
let's put it this way: on what i would presume to be a similar style port, my .96 a/r 62-1 (granted, it is a turbonetics turbo without the ceramic ballbearing option) doesnt REALLY get going until about 4,000 rpms. with a 1.32, you'll probably trick yourself into thinking that your car is slower than it really is. :P
Old 06-04-08, 11:21 PM
  #6  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
660 secondarys
uhhh you don't have enough fuel for this anyway. That's enough fuel for maybe 250whp, unless you meant 1680 secondarys? I would do 720/1000, 550/1680, or 720/1680, depending on how much power you plan on making. You have a standalone to control it so go for it. I use 720/1680 with a 60-1 .96 hotside, .70 compressor.

.60 compressor and 1.32 hotside seems like a mismatch. Better off with .82 , .96, or 1.0 hotside with .70 compressor and at least a 60-1 equivalent wheel or larger.

I wouldn't put a 1.32 on anything less than a bridgeport personally.
Old 06-05-08, 04:59 AM
  #7  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Spannersrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nope only 660cc secondarys although im only running lowish boost 10-14 psi.. i have a wideband installed and have plently of fuel at redline at 9 psi.. although now im told my hybrid turbo should be able to flow 15psi till redline.. i am running a 44mm tial wastegate but suffering from boost drop after 4000 rpm.. would it be wise to change my feed to wastegate after intercooler incase my pressure drop is through there? i can get 13 psi at 3000 rpm this is normal??
Old 06-05-08, 11:53 AM
  #8  
Back at it again!!

iTrader: (3)
 
2Lucky2tha7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not a matter of how much boost you're running (psi), it's a matter of how much hp you are putting out.
Old 06-05-08, 11:56 AM
  #9  
BDC
BDC Motorsports

 
BDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
A 1.32 A/R turbine housing will work on a high overlap motor with a tuned-length, divided manifold. I only know of one successful setup like that and it's Comitatus' car. I tried a 1.32 A/R P-trim on my T70 and it was way, way laggy even on my half bridgeport. I swapped it over to a 0.96 and it's much better. For your setup, I'd recommend a 0.81 or 0.84 A/R.

B
Old 06-05-08, 12:00 PM
  #10  
BDC
BDC Motorsports

 
BDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 2Lucky2tha7
It's not a matter of how much boost you're running (psi), it's a matter of how much hp you are putting out.
+1.

This is a common misunderstanding the average enthusiast has -- it's easy to get hung up on some (x) psi boost figure but it's only one part of a larger equation. The thing we ought to be measuring is mass air flow. In the case of a compressor on a turbocharger, it's the output of air measured in lbs/min at (x) pressure ratio. Don't get hung up on trying to hit some target boost pressure. Instead, focus on the power you want, then figure out the amount of airflow needed, then find a turbo that'll do the job.

B
Old 11-04-09, 03:39 AM
  #11  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Spannersrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason I'm on about boost pressure is because I don't want more than 1bar of pressure going through my motor for reliabilty reasons. I'm thinking of getting around .82 hotside and .7 compressor now. will upgrade injectors for this too and hoping 500hp pump can handle it. not concerned about hp figure but it made 290 atw on 9 psi stock turbo so 350+ shouldnt be too much of an ask with larger turbo?
Old 11-04-09, 09:54 AM
  #12  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
.81 undivided .84 divided will get you a good overall responsive 500whp capable car on that frame turbo. I wouldn't look any larger than a 1.0 divided maybe .96 undivided if you don't mind a little loss on the low end.
Old 11-04-09, 03:59 PM
  #13  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for me, a 1.32 is good, thats why i have one. its also on a pp.
for you about a .8-.9 is good, if you want response to be kept.

having a twin scroll manifold and the necessary hardware to go with it is also a factor. That as well as the amount of intercooler tubing you have.

keep in mind that a 500hp fuel pump for a piston engine is about a 400 hp pump in a rotary.. due to the lower B.S.F.C.

defiantly need to throw on those 1680cc injectors as well, without them, you are wasting your money on all the other stuff.
Old 11-04-09, 05:59 PM
  #14  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Spannersrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok.. so ill wait till next year so I can can have it all sorted.. around .84 turbine.. I'll make up a surge tank and throw an external pump to make sure i Have enough fuel at that end and soem bigger injectors at the other end.. shoul i consider a FPR as well?

Sorry i don't know what B.S.F.C is

Should be over 400hp+ at this stage? that will be plenty for me want to keep spool and not lose top end
Old 11-04-09, 07:57 PM
  #15  
Full Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Trionic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brake Specific Fuel Consumption.

Basically the efficiency at which your engine can convert the potential energy that your fuel has into mechanical motion.

You need more fuel per horsepower on a rotary, so a 500HP rated fuel pump on a piston engine won't be good for 500HP on a rotary engine.
Old 11-05-09, 12:30 PM
  #16  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Spannersrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what fuel setups do you have?
Old 11-05-09, 01:33 PM
  #17  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well you just need to multiply the rated horsepower by .85 and that is a rough estimate for how much fuel a rotary will consume. so a 1000 hp pump for a piston engine is only good for around 850 hp on a rotary.

you defiantly need a f.p.r. for your system. you will also need all the correct sized fuel lines, throughout the entire setup.
Old 11-05-09, 02:04 PM
  #18  
Adaptronic Distributor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 7,066
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
Chances are you have either a 57 or 60 trim TO4E( or similiar). If that is the case .96/1.0 will be good up to 25psi( assuming its a P trim). Past that exhaust back pressure will be too high.
Old 11-05-09, 06:05 PM
  #19  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Spannersrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is what im looking at


For 13b model GT37 with GT P trim turbine .7-.84 is ideal for 1-1.3bar. its basically same spec as garrett and hks T04S.
Its suitable for 400-450whp with good spool.
Old 11-07-09, 11:31 PM
  #20  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a gt35r is good for 500rwhp at around 20psi

you should be able to get more out of a gt37
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
05-27-17 04:51 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
08-18-15 05:30 PM



Quick Reply: turbo too big?? 1.32 hot side



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.