Help with BB GT35
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Help with BB GT35
I need some help selecting a GT35R for my car.
This car as all necessary modifications and I am running a standalone and a HKS manifold and wastegate. The car has a ported S4 TII motor. The car is an FB widebody. I last dynoed at 365 RWHP with 320lb of torque.
My goal here is quick spool up with a little over 400 rwhp (maybe 425). Car is a street/track car as I take it HPDE at the loval race tracks and it is not a DD. I have my heart set on the GT35 series due to their fast spool up.
Dave at KDR told me that I should look for a GT35 with a .64-74 hotside and a .70 coldside. I would like to know everyone elses recommendations as well.
I was lookg at both the RX-7 store:
https://www.rx7club.com/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=23
and A-Spec:
http://www.a-spectuning.com/store/in...&products_id=8
Any help here and any one with experience with the GTX turbos?
Thanks!
This car as all necessary modifications and I am running a standalone and a HKS manifold and wastegate. The car has a ported S4 TII motor. The car is an FB widebody. I last dynoed at 365 RWHP with 320lb of torque.
My goal here is quick spool up with a little over 400 rwhp (maybe 425). Car is a street/track car as I take it HPDE at the loval race tracks and it is not a DD. I have my heart set on the GT35 series due to their fast spool up.
Dave at KDR told me that I should look for a GT35 with a .64-74 hotside and a .70 coldside. I would like to know everyone elses recommendations as well.
I was lookg at both the RX-7 store:
https://www.rx7club.com/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=23
and A-Spec:
http://www.a-spectuning.com/store/in...&products_id=8
Any help here and any one with experience with the GTX turbos?
Thanks!
Gt35r....
Think your goin the right way w/that GT35R BALLBEARING bro. I'd call Jason @
RX7 Store and tell him what your tryin to do and he will hook you up. I love my GT35R which came from Jason.
Good luck w/that.
RX7 Store and tell him what your tryin to do and he will hook you up. I love my GT35R which came from Jason.
Good luck w/that.
Several ways to go about it. With an HKS manifold I would go with a 60 trim To4E .84, it will spool faster than a GT35R, just take a couple more psi to make up the rwhp difference...
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
I am currently running a T04E that I had custom built by BNR. I don't remember the specs, but I was under the impression that the GT35R spooled faster and made more power.
Not in my real world experience, but there are other factors that greatly affect this. Are you talking about a BNR hybrid To4E based on a stock frame turbo?
I never recommend anything less than the 1.06 for the Gt35R on an 2 rotor. You won't see any real difference in spool, just kill your top end..
I never recommend anything less than the 1.06 for the Gt35R on an 2 rotor. You won't see any real difference in spool, just kill your top end..
I actually hit 330rwhp using 18psi midrange, falling to 13.5psi @ 7300rpm. The idea was to get the thing spooling as quick as possible. Under these conditions would be operating around 105000RPM. Using electronic boost control or even stiffer springs in my wastegate (and putting up with the absolute MOUNTAIN of torque at 4000rpm that 20+psi gives you) I could get it to hold closer to 1.2bar/17psi @ 7300rpm and make the 370rwhp. That would be spinning the turbo to 125000RPM and absolutely maxed out completely verticle lines on the compressor map.
There will always be a huge rise in power on a twin rotor wankel around 4000RPM when using evalated boost pressures. I feel that is one of the reasons the factory was using boost pressures around 0.5bar.
I would not use a turbine housing smaller than 0.84 on a P-trim turbine wheel(65mm exducer). I would not use a turbine wheel smaller than a 55mm exducer (found in stage3-t3/gt30r/stock FC turbine). And for either 55 or 62mm exducer turbines I would use the 1.0 turbine housing.
If you compare most 300-500rwhp turbos on a rotary you will see that you very rarely get 18psi happening much earlier than 4000RPM. The bigger turbos have larger turbine wheels so more fin and harvest more of the waste heat.
When using smaller turbos what you do find is faster throttle response in the areas where there is not an abundant amount of waste heat, you also find the turbo is more eager to get going in the 2000-3000RPM band when you go smaller. You need to decide first on your PEAK power goal, and then decide if you care about throttle response between 2000 and 3500rpm or throttle response between 4000RPM and 7500RPM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
[QUOTE=Turblown;10526211]Not in my real world experience, but there are other factors that greatly affect this. Are you talking about a BNR hybrid To4E based on a stock frame turbo?
QUOTE]
No, I started with a hybrid and gave up on that. I sent it back to BNR and had him build it as a full T04E. As stated, currently running a HKS manifold and HKS 50mm external wastegate.
Pic of my current setup

My turbo before going in:


As you can see, not a hybrid.
QUOTE]
No, I started with a hybrid and gave up on that. I sent it back to BNR and had him build it as a full T04E. As stated, currently running a HKS manifold and HKS 50mm external wastegate.
Pic of my current setup

My turbo before going in:


As you can see, not a hybrid.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
I custom built a turbo which was designed to support 370rwhp (1.2bar) operating on the ragged edge. My idea was minimal wheel sizes combined with 1.0 A/R turbine and a 60trim 70mm OD compressor wheel.
I actually hit 330rwhp using 18psi midrange, falling to 13.5psi @ 7300rpm. The idea was to get the thing spooling as quick as possible. Under these conditions would be operating around 105000RPM. Using electronic boost control or even stiffer springs in my wastegate (and putting up with the absolute MOUNTAIN of torque at 4000rpm that 20+psi gives you) I could get it to hold closer to 1.2bar/17psi @ 7300rpm and make the 370rwhp. That would be spinning the turbo to 125000RPM and absolutely maxed out completely verticle lines on the compressor map.
There will always be a huge rise in power on a twin rotor wankel around 4000RPM when using evalated boost pressures. I feel that is one of the reasons the factory was using boost pressures around 0.5bar.
I would not use a turbine housing smaller than 0.84 on a P-trim turbine wheel(65mm exducer). I would not use a turbine wheel smaller than a 55mm exducer (found in stage3-t3/gt30r/stock FC turbine). And for either 55 or 62mm exducer turbines I would use the 1.0 turbine housing.
If you compare most 300-500rwhp turbos on a rotary you will see that you very rarely get 18psi happening much earlier than 4000RPM. The bigger turbos have larger turbine wheels so more fin and harvest more of the waste heat.
When using smaller turbos what you do find is faster throttle response in the areas where there is not an abundant amount of waste heat, you also find the turbo is more eager to get going in the 2000-3000RPM band when you go smaller. You need to decide first on your PEAK power goal, and then decide if you care about throttle response between 2000 and 3500rpm or throttle response between 4000RPM and 7500RPM.
I actually hit 330rwhp using 18psi midrange, falling to 13.5psi @ 7300rpm. The idea was to get the thing spooling as quick as possible. Under these conditions would be operating around 105000RPM. Using electronic boost control or even stiffer springs in my wastegate (and putting up with the absolute MOUNTAIN of torque at 4000rpm that 20+psi gives you) I could get it to hold closer to 1.2bar/17psi @ 7300rpm and make the 370rwhp. That would be spinning the turbo to 125000RPM and absolutely maxed out completely verticle lines on the compressor map.
There will always be a huge rise in power on a twin rotor wankel around 4000RPM when using evalated boost pressures. I feel that is one of the reasons the factory was using boost pressures around 0.5bar.
I would not use a turbine housing smaller than 0.84 on a P-trim turbine wheel(65mm exducer). I would not use a turbine wheel smaller than a 55mm exducer (found in stage3-t3/gt30r/stock FC turbine). And for either 55 or 62mm exducer turbines I would use the 1.0 turbine housing.
If you compare most 300-500rwhp turbos on a rotary you will see that you very rarely get 18psi happening much earlier than 4000RPM. The bigger turbos have larger turbine wheels so more fin and harvest more of the waste heat.
When using smaller turbos what you do find is faster throttle response in the areas where there is not an abundant amount of waste heat, you also find the turbo is more eager to get going in the 2000-3000RPM band when you go smaller. You need to decide first on your PEAK power goal, and then decide if you care about throttle response between 2000 and 3500rpm or throttle response between 4000RPM and 7500RPM.
This is good advice, I started with a .82 open volute and later changed to a 1.06 divided and experienced no change in spool, 10psi by 2800 on both housings. I did get better boost control and the car feels better on top end.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Ok, so 1.06 A/R it is. I don't really understand the two dropdowns. I selected the 1.06 A/R and then on the turbine housing style I guess I need to also select the 1.06 A/R T04 with the V-band clamp?
Also, it it worth it to get the ported shroud (anti surge)? Does it really make a difference?
On a unrelated note, I got the Dinan Stage 2 software in my DD 335i DD yesterday. Holy hell, 400+lbs of torque is crazy. Makes gear shifting almost irrelevant. And that was suposed to be my "civil" car.
Also, it it worth it to get the ported shroud (anti surge)? Does it really make a difference?
On a unrelated note, I got the Dinan Stage 2 software in my DD 335i DD yesterday. Holy hell, 400+lbs of torque is crazy. Makes gear shifting almost irrelevant. And that was suposed to be my "civil" car.
Nice. Im currently running a jb+ @ 75% and bms dual cones on my 07 335i, the torque is awesome even with my mild setup. I think im switching to the cobb AP when its released for 07 models.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE

Cheers!
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Iam in a similar boat. I have a TII swapped fb that ive been researching turbos for.
The current turbo was a hybrid that gave up the ghost, now im trying to decide if i want to go bnr hybrid, t04, or something else like a BB gt35.

I would guess that T04E 60 Trim with P-Trim 1.0 A/R turbine on tubular manifold will be able to push out more than car would transmit effectively
traction was one of things I was hopping the OP could comment on. seeing as he has an fb for track duty
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
yes, its a good amount of power, the fb could handle the 300whp i had with sticky rubber. future goals will be wide body to stuff some bigger wheels and tires. but if the power is smooth it should be okay.
traction was one of things I was hopping the OP could comment on. seeing as he has an fb for track duty
traction was one of things I was hopping the OP could comment on. seeing as he has an fb for track duty
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danielbradley2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Sep 28, 2015 10:44 PM
EFINI_RX-7_RZ
Single Turbo RX-7's
9
Jan 18, 2005 04:24 PM








