Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

GT35 vs GT40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2006 | 01:04 PM
  #1  
takahashiRyosukeFC3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 miracle from sainthood
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts / Osaka Japan
GT35 vs GT40

i'm looking into these two turbos by Garrett, the GT35R and the GT40R. both are Ball Berring turbos and from the maps it looks as though the 40 has the exact same spool time but with higher flow than the 35... am I looking at these graphs wrong?

I created these overlays to show my point. the comp map displays the 40 in blue and the 35 in red. the boost graph displays the 40 on the top 4 lines and the 35 on the bottom 3.

my question is would the 35 create positive pressure before the 40 with a 0.86 A/R???

My goal is only about 350whp from an S4 engine. (with supporting mods of course) but I want it to spool as fast as possible to reduce lag without the risk of choking the engine at all if any up top.

thank you for your help,
TR
Attached Thumbnails GT35 vs GT40-garett-gt35-n-40-r-copy.jpg   GT35 vs GT40-garett-gt35-n-40-r-boost-copy.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #2  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
thats too much of a turbo if you're only looking for 350whp
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #3  
takahashiRyosukeFC3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 miracle from sainthood
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts / Osaka Japan
I really have alot to learn about the turbo upgrade i want to do.

thank you,
TR
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 12:03 AM
  #4  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
fwiw, if you're looking for 350whp, i'd go with a t04b or e 50trim or 54 trim. you can make 350whp on pumpgas with that without much fuss.

Last edited by jacobcartmill; Feb 22, 2006 at 12:06 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
The Griffin's Avatar
Burning up Time
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 805
Likes: 2
From: Earth
If you are looking at a T04E than I would look at nothing smaller than a 57-trim . A 50-trim is too small for a rotary.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #6  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
he has stock ports and he only wants 350whp max.

i have a v1/v2 (which is close to a 50trim) t04b and i made 330whp@13psi. the 50 trim wheel and bigger E housing should be plenty for 350whp.

however, yes, a 57 trim would get to 350whp more easily.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #7  
The Griffin's Avatar
Burning up Time
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 805
Likes: 2
From: Earth
You have to add a bit more info.Your dyno was on a street ported motor with a large 1.15a/r hotside,correct?

Last edited by The Griffin; Feb 22, 2006 at 06:42 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #8  
pp13bnos's Avatar
Pineapple Racer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Oregon
Go bigger than you plan. If you think you want 350rwhp, you're going to get used to it, and want 400rwhp. IMOP, 400rwhp for a street car is very nice. CJ
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #9  
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
My job is to blow **** up
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 5
From: palmyra Indiana
yea exactly wwhy i am going with a gt42r, i plan on 450-500, but you never know, if c16 falls in my hands> turn it up to 550-650
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 06:21 AM
  #10  
takahashiRyosukeFC3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 miracle from sainthood
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts / Osaka Japan
ok so the general concesus from multiple people I have been talking to is T04 e 57-60 trim with .84-1.00 A/R... what the hell is A/R? the only thing i know it as is the radius from the turbine shaft to the housing wall... so it would dictate the physical size of the turbo.

thank you all for taking the time to confirm everything, and helping a SEVERE turbo NOOB out.

a fine point: again I'm not looking for a turbo to kick me in the @$$ at 5,000rpm a want the turbo to start generating posative boost as early in the rev band as possible with making the 350WHP i want on stock ports and minimal if any chocking of the engine up top... no detrimental back pressure.

thank you all again,
TR
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #11  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
If you want early early boost response then you don't want a GT40R. There are versions of the GT35R now that will give you really early spool up with great power potential. You could also use the standard T3 hotsided GT35R and easily hit the numbers you want. Or you could look into the Apex'i RX-6 turbo. That spools up very fast and shouldn't have any problems hitting 350rwhp. If you weren't as worried about spool then I would say go with a regular 60-1. That would easily hit the power numbers you want, but I don't have enough experience with them to tell you the spool characteristics of it. Good luck to you.

Zach
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #12  
20B10AE's Avatar
Gone Darkside
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
From: Irmo, SC USA
I agree with a lot of the comments made in here including the solid answer made by Zach other than the 60-1 part (which he DID say he wasn't that familiar with it).

The nice thing about the 60-1 is that it is relatively inexpensive, has a T4 flange which will mate directly to the also inexpensive HKS cast manifold and will provide you with the power you're looking for. I ran mine with a 1.15 hotside on a stock ported motor and I loved it.

If you want a faster spool and still be able to hit your power goal, go with the .96 hotside. I would say the .84 for even faster response, but I'm honestly not sure if that would curb you just shy of your 350whp.

IMO, for the money, that's the way to go. If, however, you decide to go with the ball bearing turbo, the GT35 is a great choice. I'm not intimately familiar with it but I know of a good number of people who have had great success with it.

My $.02

Reese
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #13  
Asleep's Avatar
7 Rx-7s since 1980
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 1
From: oHIo
Go with the 35r with the T4 flange, even with the stock ports. Then when you port that a little bit you'll be into the 400's. Aspec RS based 35 would be better on a ported engine I would think.

Don't do the 40r on a stock ported engine with low boost or HP goals.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 09:34 AM
  #14  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #15  
20B10AE's Avatar
Gone Darkside
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
From: Irmo, SC USA
My mistake on that point. I didn't realise the 35 could be had with a T4 flange. If cost isn't the issue, that would be a good choice.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #16  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
Reese, I've told you about that T4 GT35 variant before. You don't listen!! I would have to say that if you have the money that turbo seems to be the one to beat these days!!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #17  
ReZ311's Avatar
KM48 Burnout
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 1
From: Ventura County, CA
Do you have a refrence to purchase this T4 turbine housing for a GT35R bb turbo? I asked Innovative, but they don't have any idea where to get a T4 housing for a GT35R. I have a T3 and would like to have the option to bump the housing up bigger.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 07:17 PM
  #18  
JDK's Avatar
JDK
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 1
From: Mississauga,Ont Canada
www.atpturbo.com
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #19  
ronbros3's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX.
I just bought a GT4067, not an r, it has a 67mm inducer at compressor housing, 4" inlet .58 A/R,,,,,, turbine housing T4 flange .95 A/R, but the exducer size measures as a Q wheel, I would have preferred a P wheel turbine, what might be expected from this turbo. its brand new never used. and finding P trim wheels and housings for GT40s aint easy, and probably cost more than another turbo. looking for 500whp FD. any opinions??
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #20  
Indian's Avatar
It wasn't me!!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Cayman Islands
pushing this back to the top.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 11:47 PM
  #21  
dregg100's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: AZ
why?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:59 PM
  #22  
Indian's Avatar
It wasn't me!!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Cayman Islands
want to know if anyone knows anything about the precision gt4067.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
Oct 14, 2015 12:31 PM
93FD510
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Oct 1, 2015 02:00 PM
danielbradley2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Sep 28, 2015 10:44 PM
rx7tt95
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
Mar 12, 2004 06:57 PM
Carl Byck
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
Dec 8, 2002 08:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.